Cargando…

Development and Validation of the Middle Years Development Instrument (MDI): Assessing Children’s Well-Being and Assets across Multiple Contexts

Few instruments provide reliable and valid data on child well-being and contextual assets during middle childhood, using children as informants. The authors developed a population-level, self-report measure of school-aged children’s well-being and assets—the Middle Years Development Instrument (MDI)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schonert-Reichl, Kimberly A., Guhn, Martin, Gadermann, Anne M., Hymel, Shelley, Sweiss, Lina, Hertzman, Clyde
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3790250/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24109151
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0149-y
_version_ 1782286567904116736
author Schonert-Reichl, Kimberly A.
Guhn, Martin
Gadermann, Anne M.
Hymel, Shelley
Sweiss, Lina
Hertzman, Clyde
author_facet Schonert-Reichl, Kimberly A.
Guhn, Martin
Gadermann, Anne M.
Hymel, Shelley
Sweiss, Lina
Hertzman, Clyde
author_sort Schonert-Reichl, Kimberly A.
collection PubMed
description Few instruments provide reliable and valid data on child well-being and contextual assets during middle childhood, using children as informants. The authors developed a population-level, self-report measure of school-aged children’s well-being and assets—the Middle Years Development Instrument (MDI)—and examined its reliability and validity. The MDI was designed to assess child well-being inside and outside of school on five dimensions: (1) Social and emotional development, (2) Connectedness to peers and to adults at school, at home, and in the neighborhood, (3) School experiences, (4) Physical health and well-being, and (5) Constructive use of time after school. This paper describes the theoretical framework, selection of items and scales for the survey, and four studies that were conducted to revise the MDI and examine its psychometric properties. The findings indicate a theoretically predicted factor structure, high internal consistency, and document the convergent and discriminant validity of the MDI scales. The discussion delineates a plan for future validation studies that address further validity questions, such as predictive validity, measurement invariance, and fairness/bias, and provides a brief outlook of how the MDI may be used by practitioners, educators, and decision makers in schools and communities to motivate and inform action in support children’s well-being.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3790250
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37902502013-10-07 Development and Validation of the Middle Years Development Instrument (MDI): Assessing Children’s Well-Being and Assets across Multiple Contexts Schonert-Reichl, Kimberly A. Guhn, Martin Gadermann, Anne M. Hymel, Shelley Sweiss, Lina Hertzman, Clyde Soc Indic Res Article Few instruments provide reliable and valid data on child well-being and contextual assets during middle childhood, using children as informants. The authors developed a population-level, self-report measure of school-aged children’s well-being and assets—the Middle Years Development Instrument (MDI)—and examined its reliability and validity. The MDI was designed to assess child well-being inside and outside of school on five dimensions: (1) Social and emotional development, (2) Connectedness to peers and to adults at school, at home, and in the neighborhood, (3) School experiences, (4) Physical health and well-being, and (5) Constructive use of time after school. This paper describes the theoretical framework, selection of items and scales for the survey, and four studies that were conducted to revise the MDI and examine its psychometric properties. The findings indicate a theoretically predicted factor structure, high internal consistency, and document the convergent and discriminant validity of the MDI scales. The discussion delineates a plan for future validation studies that address further validity questions, such as predictive validity, measurement invariance, and fairness/bias, and provides a brief outlook of how the MDI may be used by practitioners, educators, and decision makers in schools and communities to motivate and inform action in support children’s well-being. Springer Netherlands 2012-10-02 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3790250/ /pubmed/24109151 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0149-y Text en © The Author(s) 2012 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Schonert-Reichl, Kimberly A.
Guhn, Martin
Gadermann, Anne M.
Hymel, Shelley
Sweiss, Lina
Hertzman, Clyde
Development and Validation of the Middle Years Development Instrument (MDI): Assessing Children’s Well-Being and Assets across Multiple Contexts
title Development and Validation of the Middle Years Development Instrument (MDI): Assessing Children’s Well-Being and Assets across Multiple Contexts
title_full Development and Validation of the Middle Years Development Instrument (MDI): Assessing Children’s Well-Being and Assets across Multiple Contexts
title_fullStr Development and Validation of the Middle Years Development Instrument (MDI): Assessing Children’s Well-Being and Assets across Multiple Contexts
title_full_unstemmed Development and Validation of the Middle Years Development Instrument (MDI): Assessing Children’s Well-Being and Assets across Multiple Contexts
title_short Development and Validation of the Middle Years Development Instrument (MDI): Assessing Children’s Well-Being and Assets across Multiple Contexts
title_sort development and validation of the middle years development instrument (mdi): assessing children’s well-being and assets across multiple contexts
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3790250/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24109151
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0149-y
work_keys_str_mv AT schonertreichlkimberlya developmentandvalidationofthemiddleyearsdevelopmentinstrumentmdiassessingchildrenswellbeingandassetsacrossmultiplecontexts
AT guhnmartin developmentandvalidationofthemiddleyearsdevelopmentinstrumentmdiassessingchildrenswellbeingandassetsacrossmultiplecontexts
AT gadermannannem developmentandvalidationofthemiddleyearsdevelopmentinstrumentmdiassessingchildrenswellbeingandassetsacrossmultiplecontexts
AT hymelshelley developmentandvalidationofthemiddleyearsdevelopmentinstrumentmdiassessingchildrenswellbeingandassetsacrossmultiplecontexts
AT sweisslina developmentandvalidationofthemiddleyearsdevelopmentinstrumentmdiassessingchildrenswellbeingandassetsacrossmultiplecontexts
AT hertzmanclyde developmentandvalidationofthemiddleyearsdevelopmentinstrumentmdiassessingchildrenswellbeingandassetsacrossmultiplecontexts