Cargando…

Rats maintain a binocular field centered on the horizon

In this letter, we attempt to correct a potentially serious misperception arising from the paper “Rats maintain an overhead binocular field at the expense of constant fusion”. While the authors repeatedly emphasize that the animal’s binocular field is overhead, the authors’ own data show that the tr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meister, Markus, Cox, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000Research 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3790602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24358866
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.2-176.v1
_version_ 1782286614673752064
author Meister, Markus
Cox, David
author_facet Meister, Markus
Cox, David
author_sort Meister, Markus
collection PubMed
description In this letter, we attempt to correct a potentially serious misperception arising from the paper “Rats maintain an overhead binocular field at the expense of constant fusion”. While the authors repeatedly emphasize that the animal’s binocular field is overhead, the authors’ own data show that the truth is quite different, even orthogonal: the binocular field is in fact centered dead-ahead in front of the animal, tapering to a sliver both above and below the animal.  We predict that this paper will be widely cited for something that it does not demonstrate, a concern that is borne out by the paper’s earliest citation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3790602
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher F1000Research
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37906022013-12-05 Rats maintain a binocular field centered on the horizon Meister, Markus Cox, David F1000Res Correspondence In this letter, we attempt to correct a potentially serious misperception arising from the paper “Rats maintain an overhead binocular field at the expense of constant fusion”. While the authors repeatedly emphasize that the animal’s binocular field is overhead, the authors’ own data show that the truth is quite different, even orthogonal: the binocular field is in fact centered dead-ahead in front of the animal, tapering to a sliver both above and below the animal.  We predict that this paper will be widely cited for something that it does not demonstrate, a concern that is borne out by the paper’s earliest citation. F1000Research 2013-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3790602/ /pubmed/24358866 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.2-176.v1 Text en Copyright: © 2013 Meister M et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ Data associated with the article are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero "No rights reserved" data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).
spellingShingle Correspondence
Meister, Markus
Cox, David
Rats maintain a binocular field centered on the horizon
title Rats maintain a binocular field centered on the horizon
title_full Rats maintain a binocular field centered on the horizon
title_fullStr Rats maintain a binocular field centered on the horizon
title_full_unstemmed Rats maintain a binocular field centered on the horizon
title_short Rats maintain a binocular field centered on the horizon
title_sort rats maintain a binocular field centered on the horizon
topic Correspondence
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3790602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24358866
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.2-176.v1
work_keys_str_mv AT meistermarkus ratsmaintainabinocularfieldcenteredonthehorizon
AT coxdavid ratsmaintainabinocularfieldcenteredonthehorizon