Cargando…
Dependency-dependent interference: NPI interference, agreement attraction, and global pragmatic inferences
Previous psycholinguistics studies have shown that when forming a long distance dependency in online processing, the parser sometimes accepts a sentence even though the required grammatical constraints are only partially met. A mechanistic account of how such errors arise sheds light on both the und...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3791380/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24109468 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00708 |
_version_ | 1782286709359116288 |
---|---|
author | Xiang, Ming Grove, Julian Giannakidou, Anastasia |
author_facet | Xiang, Ming Grove, Julian Giannakidou, Anastasia |
author_sort | Xiang, Ming |
collection | PubMed |
description | Previous psycholinguistics studies have shown that when forming a long distance dependency in online processing, the parser sometimes accepts a sentence even though the required grammatical constraints are only partially met. A mechanistic account of how such errors arise sheds light on both the underlying linguistic representations involved and the processing mechanisms that put such representations together. In the current study, we contrast the negative polarity items (NPI) interference effect, as shown by the acceptance of an ungrammatical sentence like “The bills that democratic senators have voted for will ever become law,” with the well-known phenomenon of agreement attraction (“The key to the cabinets are … ”). On the surface, these two types of errors look alike and thereby can be explained as being driven by the same source: similarity based memory interference. However, we argue that the linguistic representations involved in NPI licensing are substantially different from those of subject-verb agreement, and therefore the interference effects in each domain potentially arise from distinct sources. In particular, we show that NPI interference at least partially arises from pragmatic inferences. In a self-paced reading study with an acceptability judgment task, we showed NPI interference was modulated by participants' general pragmatic communicative skills, as quantified by the Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ, Baron-Cohen et al., 2001), especially in offline tasks. Participants with more autistic traits were actually less prone to the NPI interference effect than those with fewer autistic traits. This result contrasted with agreement attraction conditions, which were not influenced by individual pragmatic skill differences. We also show that different NPI licensors seem to have distinct interference profiles. We discuss two kinds of interference effects for NPI licensing: memory-retrieval based and pragmatically triggered. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3791380 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37913802013-10-09 Dependency-dependent interference: NPI interference, agreement attraction, and global pragmatic inferences Xiang, Ming Grove, Julian Giannakidou, Anastasia Front Psychol Psychology Previous psycholinguistics studies have shown that when forming a long distance dependency in online processing, the parser sometimes accepts a sentence even though the required grammatical constraints are only partially met. A mechanistic account of how such errors arise sheds light on both the underlying linguistic representations involved and the processing mechanisms that put such representations together. In the current study, we contrast the negative polarity items (NPI) interference effect, as shown by the acceptance of an ungrammatical sentence like “The bills that democratic senators have voted for will ever become law,” with the well-known phenomenon of agreement attraction (“The key to the cabinets are … ”). On the surface, these two types of errors look alike and thereby can be explained as being driven by the same source: similarity based memory interference. However, we argue that the linguistic representations involved in NPI licensing are substantially different from those of subject-verb agreement, and therefore the interference effects in each domain potentially arise from distinct sources. In particular, we show that NPI interference at least partially arises from pragmatic inferences. In a self-paced reading study with an acceptability judgment task, we showed NPI interference was modulated by participants' general pragmatic communicative skills, as quantified by the Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ, Baron-Cohen et al., 2001), especially in offline tasks. Participants with more autistic traits were actually less prone to the NPI interference effect than those with fewer autistic traits. This result contrasted with agreement attraction conditions, which were not influenced by individual pragmatic skill differences. We also show that different NPI licensors seem to have distinct interference profiles. We discuss two kinds of interference effects for NPI licensing: memory-retrieval based and pragmatically triggered. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3791380/ /pubmed/24109468 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00708 Text en Copyright © 2013 Xiang, Grove and Giannakidou. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Xiang, Ming Grove, Julian Giannakidou, Anastasia Dependency-dependent interference: NPI interference, agreement attraction, and global pragmatic inferences |
title | Dependency-dependent interference: NPI interference, agreement attraction, and global pragmatic inferences |
title_full | Dependency-dependent interference: NPI interference, agreement attraction, and global pragmatic inferences |
title_fullStr | Dependency-dependent interference: NPI interference, agreement attraction, and global pragmatic inferences |
title_full_unstemmed | Dependency-dependent interference: NPI interference, agreement attraction, and global pragmatic inferences |
title_short | Dependency-dependent interference: NPI interference, agreement attraction, and global pragmatic inferences |
title_sort | dependency-dependent interference: npi interference, agreement attraction, and global pragmatic inferences |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3791380/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24109468 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00708 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xiangming dependencydependentinterferencenpiinterferenceagreementattractionandglobalpragmaticinferences AT grovejulian dependencydependentinterferencenpiinterferenceagreementattractionandglobalpragmaticinferences AT giannakidouanastasia dependencydependentinterferencenpiinterferenceagreementattractionandglobalpragmaticinferences |