Cargando…
Comparative neuronal differentiation of self-renewing neural progenitor cell lines obtained from human induced pluripotent stem cells
Most human neuronal disorders are associated with genetic alterations that cause defects in neuronal development and induce precocious neurodegeneration. In order to fully characterize the molecular mechanisms underlying the onset of these devastating diseases, it is important to establish in vitro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3791383/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24109433 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2013.00175 |
_version_ | 1782286710294446080 |
---|---|
author | Verpelli, Chiara Carlessi, Luigi Bechi, Giulia Fusar Poli, Elena Orellana, Daniel Heise, Christopher Franceschetti, Silvana Mantegazza, Renato Mantegazza, Massimo Delia, Domenico Sala, Carlo |
author_facet | Verpelli, Chiara Carlessi, Luigi Bechi, Giulia Fusar Poli, Elena Orellana, Daniel Heise, Christopher Franceschetti, Silvana Mantegazza, Renato Mantegazza, Massimo Delia, Domenico Sala, Carlo |
author_sort | Verpelli, Chiara |
collection | PubMed |
description | Most human neuronal disorders are associated with genetic alterations that cause defects in neuronal development and induce precocious neurodegeneration. In order to fully characterize the molecular mechanisms underlying the onset of these devastating diseases, it is important to establish in vitro models able to recapitulate the human pathology as closely as possible. Here we compared three different differentiation protocols for obtaining functional neurons from human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs): human neural progenitors (hNPs) obtained from hiPSCs were differentiated by co-culturing them with rat primary neurons, glial cells or simply by culturing them on matrigel in neuronal differentiation medium, and the differentiation level was compared using immunofluorescence, biochemical and electrophysiological methods. We show that the differentiated neurons displayed distinct maturation properties depending on the protocol used and the faster morphological and functional maturation was obtained when hNPs were co-cultured with rat primary neurons. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3791383 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37913832013-10-09 Comparative neuronal differentiation of self-renewing neural progenitor cell lines obtained from human induced pluripotent stem cells Verpelli, Chiara Carlessi, Luigi Bechi, Giulia Fusar Poli, Elena Orellana, Daniel Heise, Christopher Franceschetti, Silvana Mantegazza, Renato Mantegazza, Massimo Delia, Domenico Sala, Carlo Front Cell Neurosci Neuroscience Most human neuronal disorders are associated with genetic alterations that cause defects in neuronal development and induce precocious neurodegeneration. In order to fully characterize the molecular mechanisms underlying the onset of these devastating diseases, it is important to establish in vitro models able to recapitulate the human pathology as closely as possible. Here we compared three different differentiation protocols for obtaining functional neurons from human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs): human neural progenitors (hNPs) obtained from hiPSCs were differentiated by co-culturing them with rat primary neurons, glial cells or simply by culturing them on matrigel in neuronal differentiation medium, and the differentiation level was compared using immunofluorescence, biochemical and electrophysiological methods. We show that the differentiated neurons displayed distinct maturation properties depending on the protocol used and the faster morphological and functional maturation was obtained when hNPs were co-cultured with rat primary neurons. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3791383/ /pubmed/24109433 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2013.00175 Text en Copyright © 2013 Verpelli, Carlessi, Bechi, Fusar Poli, Orellana, Heise, Franceschetti, Mantegazza, Mantegazza, Delia and Sala. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Verpelli, Chiara Carlessi, Luigi Bechi, Giulia Fusar Poli, Elena Orellana, Daniel Heise, Christopher Franceschetti, Silvana Mantegazza, Renato Mantegazza, Massimo Delia, Domenico Sala, Carlo Comparative neuronal differentiation of self-renewing neural progenitor cell lines obtained from human induced pluripotent stem cells |
title | Comparative neuronal differentiation of self-renewing neural progenitor cell lines obtained from human induced pluripotent stem cells |
title_full | Comparative neuronal differentiation of self-renewing neural progenitor cell lines obtained from human induced pluripotent stem cells |
title_fullStr | Comparative neuronal differentiation of self-renewing neural progenitor cell lines obtained from human induced pluripotent stem cells |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative neuronal differentiation of self-renewing neural progenitor cell lines obtained from human induced pluripotent stem cells |
title_short | Comparative neuronal differentiation of self-renewing neural progenitor cell lines obtained from human induced pluripotent stem cells |
title_sort | comparative neuronal differentiation of self-renewing neural progenitor cell lines obtained from human induced pluripotent stem cells |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3791383/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24109433 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2013.00175 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT verpellichiara comparativeneuronaldifferentiationofselfrenewingneuralprogenitorcelllinesobtainedfromhumaninducedpluripotentstemcells AT carlessiluigi comparativeneuronaldifferentiationofselfrenewingneuralprogenitorcelllinesobtainedfromhumaninducedpluripotentstemcells AT bechigiulia comparativeneuronaldifferentiationofselfrenewingneuralprogenitorcelllinesobtainedfromhumaninducedpluripotentstemcells AT fusarpolielena comparativeneuronaldifferentiationofselfrenewingneuralprogenitorcelllinesobtainedfromhumaninducedpluripotentstemcells AT orellanadaniel comparativeneuronaldifferentiationofselfrenewingneuralprogenitorcelllinesobtainedfromhumaninducedpluripotentstemcells AT heisechristopher comparativeneuronaldifferentiationofselfrenewingneuralprogenitorcelllinesobtainedfromhumaninducedpluripotentstemcells AT franceschettisilvana comparativeneuronaldifferentiationofselfrenewingneuralprogenitorcelllinesobtainedfromhumaninducedpluripotentstemcells AT mantegazzarenato comparativeneuronaldifferentiationofselfrenewingneuralprogenitorcelllinesobtainedfromhumaninducedpluripotentstemcells AT mantegazzamassimo comparativeneuronaldifferentiationofselfrenewingneuralprogenitorcelllinesobtainedfromhumaninducedpluripotentstemcells AT deliadomenico comparativeneuronaldifferentiationofselfrenewingneuralprogenitorcelllinesobtainedfromhumaninducedpluripotentstemcells AT salacarlo comparativeneuronaldifferentiationofselfrenewingneuralprogenitorcelllinesobtainedfromhumaninducedpluripotentstemcells |