Cargando…

Comparative neuronal differentiation of self-renewing neural progenitor cell lines obtained from human induced pluripotent stem cells

Most human neuronal disorders are associated with genetic alterations that cause defects in neuronal development and induce precocious neurodegeneration. In order to fully characterize the molecular mechanisms underlying the onset of these devastating diseases, it is important to establish in vitro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Verpelli, Chiara, Carlessi, Luigi, Bechi, Giulia, Fusar Poli, Elena, Orellana, Daniel, Heise, Christopher, Franceschetti, Silvana, Mantegazza, Renato, Mantegazza, Massimo, Delia, Domenico, Sala, Carlo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3791383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24109433
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2013.00175
_version_ 1782286710294446080
author Verpelli, Chiara
Carlessi, Luigi
Bechi, Giulia
Fusar Poli, Elena
Orellana, Daniel
Heise, Christopher
Franceschetti, Silvana
Mantegazza, Renato
Mantegazza, Massimo
Delia, Domenico
Sala, Carlo
author_facet Verpelli, Chiara
Carlessi, Luigi
Bechi, Giulia
Fusar Poli, Elena
Orellana, Daniel
Heise, Christopher
Franceschetti, Silvana
Mantegazza, Renato
Mantegazza, Massimo
Delia, Domenico
Sala, Carlo
author_sort Verpelli, Chiara
collection PubMed
description Most human neuronal disorders are associated with genetic alterations that cause defects in neuronal development and induce precocious neurodegeneration. In order to fully characterize the molecular mechanisms underlying the onset of these devastating diseases, it is important to establish in vitro models able to recapitulate the human pathology as closely as possible. Here we compared three different differentiation protocols for obtaining functional neurons from human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs): human neural progenitors (hNPs) obtained from hiPSCs were differentiated by co-culturing them with rat primary neurons, glial cells or simply by culturing them on matrigel in neuronal differentiation medium, and the differentiation level was compared using immunofluorescence, biochemical and electrophysiological methods. We show that the differentiated neurons displayed distinct maturation properties depending on the protocol used and the faster morphological and functional maturation was obtained when hNPs were co-cultured with rat primary neurons.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3791383
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37913832013-10-09 Comparative neuronal differentiation of self-renewing neural progenitor cell lines obtained from human induced pluripotent stem cells Verpelli, Chiara Carlessi, Luigi Bechi, Giulia Fusar Poli, Elena Orellana, Daniel Heise, Christopher Franceschetti, Silvana Mantegazza, Renato Mantegazza, Massimo Delia, Domenico Sala, Carlo Front Cell Neurosci Neuroscience Most human neuronal disorders are associated with genetic alterations that cause defects in neuronal development and induce precocious neurodegeneration. In order to fully characterize the molecular mechanisms underlying the onset of these devastating diseases, it is important to establish in vitro models able to recapitulate the human pathology as closely as possible. Here we compared three different differentiation protocols for obtaining functional neurons from human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs): human neural progenitors (hNPs) obtained from hiPSCs were differentiated by co-culturing them with rat primary neurons, glial cells or simply by culturing them on matrigel in neuronal differentiation medium, and the differentiation level was compared using immunofluorescence, biochemical and electrophysiological methods. We show that the differentiated neurons displayed distinct maturation properties depending on the protocol used and the faster morphological and functional maturation was obtained when hNPs were co-cultured with rat primary neurons. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3791383/ /pubmed/24109433 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2013.00175 Text en Copyright © 2013 Verpelli, Carlessi, Bechi, Fusar Poli, Orellana, Heise, Franceschetti, Mantegazza, Mantegazza, Delia and Sala. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Verpelli, Chiara
Carlessi, Luigi
Bechi, Giulia
Fusar Poli, Elena
Orellana, Daniel
Heise, Christopher
Franceschetti, Silvana
Mantegazza, Renato
Mantegazza, Massimo
Delia, Domenico
Sala, Carlo
Comparative neuronal differentiation of self-renewing neural progenitor cell lines obtained from human induced pluripotent stem cells
title Comparative neuronal differentiation of self-renewing neural progenitor cell lines obtained from human induced pluripotent stem cells
title_full Comparative neuronal differentiation of self-renewing neural progenitor cell lines obtained from human induced pluripotent stem cells
title_fullStr Comparative neuronal differentiation of self-renewing neural progenitor cell lines obtained from human induced pluripotent stem cells
title_full_unstemmed Comparative neuronal differentiation of self-renewing neural progenitor cell lines obtained from human induced pluripotent stem cells
title_short Comparative neuronal differentiation of self-renewing neural progenitor cell lines obtained from human induced pluripotent stem cells
title_sort comparative neuronal differentiation of self-renewing neural progenitor cell lines obtained from human induced pluripotent stem cells
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3791383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24109433
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2013.00175
work_keys_str_mv AT verpellichiara comparativeneuronaldifferentiationofselfrenewingneuralprogenitorcelllinesobtainedfromhumaninducedpluripotentstemcells
AT carlessiluigi comparativeneuronaldifferentiationofselfrenewingneuralprogenitorcelllinesobtainedfromhumaninducedpluripotentstemcells
AT bechigiulia comparativeneuronaldifferentiationofselfrenewingneuralprogenitorcelllinesobtainedfromhumaninducedpluripotentstemcells
AT fusarpolielena comparativeneuronaldifferentiationofselfrenewingneuralprogenitorcelllinesobtainedfromhumaninducedpluripotentstemcells
AT orellanadaniel comparativeneuronaldifferentiationofselfrenewingneuralprogenitorcelllinesobtainedfromhumaninducedpluripotentstemcells
AT heisechristopher comparativeneuronaldifferentiationofselfrenewingneuralprogenitorcelllinesobtainedfromhumaninducedpluripotentstemcells
AT franceschettisilvana comparativeneuronaldifferentiationofselfrenewingneuralprogenitorcelllinesobtainedfromhumaninducedpluripotentstemcells
AT mantegazzarenato comparativeneuronaldifferentiationofselfrenewingneuralprogenitorcelllinesobtainedfromhumaninducedpluripotentstemcells
AT mantegazzamassimo comparativeneuronaldifferentiationofselfrenewingneuralprogenitorcelllinesobtainedfromhumaninducedpluripotentstemcells
AT deliadomenico comparativeneuronaldifferentiationofselfrenewingneuralprogenitorcelllinesobtainedfromhumaninducedpluripotentstemcells
AT salacarlo comparativeneuronaldifferentiationofselfrenewingneuralprogenitorcelllinesobtainedfromhumaninducedpluripotentstemcells