Cargando…

Sexual Dimorphisms in the Dermal Denticles of the Lesser-Spotted Catshark, Scyliorhinus canicula (Linnaeus, 1758)

The dermal layers of several elasmobranch species have been shown to be sexually dimorphic. Generally, when this occurs the females have thicker dermal layers compared to those of males. This sexual dimorphism has been suggested to occur as a response to male biting during mating. Although male biti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Crooks, Neil, Babey, Lucy, Haddon, William J., Love, Adrian C., Waring, Colin P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3792157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24116179
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076887
_version_ 1782286817375027200
author Crooks, Neil
Babey, Lucy
Haddon, William J.
Love, Adrian C.
Waring, Colin P.
author_facet Crooks, Neil
Babey, Lucy
Haddon, William J.
Love, Adrian C.
Waring, Colin P.
author_sort Crooks, Neil
collection PubMed
description The dermal layers of several elasmobranch species have been shown to be sexually dimorphic. Generally, when this occurs the females have thicker dermal layers compared to those of males. This sexual dimorphism has been suggested to occur as a response to male biting during mating. Although male biting as a copulatory behaviour in Scyliorhinus canicula has been widely speculated to occur, only relatively recently has this behaviour been observed. Male S. canicula use their mouths to bite the female’s pectoral and caudal fins as part of their pre-copulatory behaviour and to grasp females during copulation. Previous work has shown that female S. canicula have a thicker epidermis compared to that of males. The structure of the dermal denticles in females may also differ from that of males in order to protect against male biting or to provide a greater degree of friction in order to allow the male more purchase. This study reveals that the length, width and density of the dermal denticles of mature male and female S. canicula are sexually dimorphic across the integument in areas where males have been observed to bite and wrap themselves around females (pectoral fin, area posterior to the pectoral fin, caudal fin, and pelvic girdle). No significant differences in the dermal denticle dimensions were found in other body areas examined (head, dorsal skin and caudal peduncle). Sexually dimorphic dermal denticles in mature S. canicula could be a response to male biting/wrapping as part of the copulatory process.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3792157
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37921572013-10-10 Sexual Dimorphisms in the Dermal Denticles of the Lesser-Spotted Catshark, Scyliorhinus canicula (Linnaeus, 1758) Crooks, Neil Babey, Lucy Haddon, William J. Love, Adrian C. Waring, Colin P. PLoS One Research Article The dermal layers of several elasmobranch species have been shown to be sexually dimorphic. Generally, when this occurs the females have thicker dermal layers compared to those of males. This sexual dimorphism has been suggested to occur as a response to male biting during mating. Although male biting as a copulatory behaviour in Scyliorhinus canicula has been widely speculated to occur, only relatively recently has this behaviour been observed. Male S. canicula use their mouths to bite the female’s pectoral and caudal fins as part of their pre-copulatory behaviour and to grasp females during copulation. Previous work has shown that female S. canicula have a thicker epidermis compared to that of males. The structure of the dermal denticles in females may also differ from that of males in order to protect against male biting or to provide a greater degree of friction in order to allow the male more purchase. This study reveals that the length, width and density of the dermal denticles of mature male and female S. canicula are sexually dimorphic across the integument in areas where males have been observed to bite and wrap themselves around females (pectoral fin, area posterior to the pectoral fin, caudal fin, and pelvic girdle). No significant differences in the dermal denticle dimensions were found in other body areas examined (head, dorsal skin and caudal peduncle). Sexually dimorphic dermal denticles in mature S. canicula could be a response to male biting/wrapping as part of the copulatory process. Public Library of Science 2013-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3792157/ /pubmed/24116179 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076887 Text en © 2013 Crooks et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Crooks, Neil
Babey, Lucy
Haddon, William J.
Love, Adrian C.
Waring, Colin P.
Sexual Dimorphisms in the Dermal Denticles of the Lesser-Spotted Catshark, Scyliorhinus canicula (Linnaeus, 1758)
title Sexual Dimorphisms in the Dermal Denticles of the Lesser-Spotted Catshark, Scyliorhinus canicula (Linnaeus, 1758)
title_full Sexual Dimorphisms in the Dermal Denticles of the Lesser-Spotted Catshark, Scyliorhinus canicula (Linnaeus, 1758)
title_fullStr Sexual Dimorphisms in the Dermal Denticles of the Lesser-Spotted Catshark, Scyliorhinus canicula (Linnaeus, 1758)
title_full_unstemmed Sexual Dimorphisms in the Dermal Denticles of the Lesser-Spotted Catshark, Scyliorhinus canicula (Linnaeus, 1758)
title_short Sexual Dimorphisms in the Dermal Denticles of the Lesser-Spotted Catshark, Scyliorhinus canicula (Linnaeus, 1758)
title_sort sexual dimorphisms in the dermal denticles of the lesser-spotted catshark, scyliorhinus canicula (linnaeus, 1758)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3792157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24116179
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076887
work_keys_str_mv AT crooksneil sexualdimorphismsinthedermaldenticlesofthelesserspottedcatsharkscyliorhinuscaniculalinnaeus1758
AT babeylucy sexualdimorphismsinthedermaldenticlesofthelesserspottedcatsharkscyliorhinuscaniculalinnaeus1758
AT haddonwilliamj sexualdimorphismsinthedermaldenticlesofthelesserspottedcatsharkscyliorhinuscaniculalinnaeus1758
AT loveadrianc sexualdimorphismsinthedermaldenticlesofthelesserspottedcatsharkscyliorhinuscaniculalinnaeus1758
AT waringcolinp sexualdimorphismsinthedermaldenticlesofthelesserspottedcatsharkscyliorhinuscaniculalinnaeus1758