Cargando…

Physician Trainees’ Decision Making and Information Processing: Choice Size and Medicare Part D

Many patients expect their doctor to help them choose a Medicare prescription drug plan. Whether the size of the choice set affects clinicians’ decision processes and strategy selection, and the quality of their choice, as it does their older patients, is an important question with serious financial...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barnes, Andrew J., Hanoch, Yaniv, Martynenko, Melissa, Wood, Stacey, Rice, Thomas, Federman, Alex D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3792159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24116209
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077096
_version_ 1782286817869955072
author Barnes, Andrew J.
Hanoch, Yaniv
Martynenko, Melissa
Wood, Stacey
Rice, Thomas
Federman, Alex D.
author_facet Barnes, Andrew J.
Hanoch, Yaniv
Martynenko, Melissa
Wood, Stacey
Rice, Thomas
Federman, Alex D.
author_sort Barnes, Andrew J.
collection PubMed
description Many patients expect their doctor to help them choose a Medicare prescription drug plan. Whether the size of the choice set affects clinicians’ decision processes and strategy selection, and the quality of their choice, as it does their older patients, is an important question with serious financial consequences. Seventy medical students and internal medicine residents completed a within-subject design using Mouselab, a computer program that allows the information-acquisition process to be examined. We examined highly numerate physician trainees’ decision processes, strategy, and their ability to pick the cheapest drug plan—as price was deemed the most important factor in Medicare beneficiaries’ plan choice—from either 3 or 9 drug plans. Before adjustment, participants were significantly more likely to identify the lowest cost plan when facing three versus nine choices (67.3% vs. 32.8%, p<0.01) and paid significantly less in excess premiums ($60.00 vs. $128.51, p<0.01). Compared to the three-plan condition, in the nine-plan condition participants spent significantly less time acquiring information on each attribute (p<0.05) and were more likely to employ decision strategies focusing on comparing alternate plans across a single attribute (search pattern, p<0.05). After adjusting for decision process and strategy, numeracy, and amount of medical training, the odds were 10.75 times higher that trainees would choose the lowest cost Medicare Part D drug plan when facing 3 versus 9 drug plans (p<0.05). Although employing more efficient search strategies in the complex choice environment, physician trainees experienced similar difficulty in choosing the lowest cost prescription drug plans as older patients do. Our results add further evidence that simplifications to the Medicare Part D decision environment are needed and suggest physicians’ role in their patients’ Part D choices may be most productive when assisting seniors with forecasting their expected medication needs and then referring them to the Medicare website or helpline.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3792159
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37921592013-10-10 Physician Trainees’ Decision Making and Information Processing: Choice Size and Medicare Part D Barnes, Andrew J. Hanoch, Yaniv Martynenko, Melissa Wood, Stacey Rice, Thomas Federman, Alex D. PLoS One Research Article Many patients expect their doctor to help them choose a Medicare prescription drug plan. Whether the size of the choice set affects clinicians’ decision processes and strategy selection, and the quality of their choice, as it does their older patients, is an important question with serious financial consequences. Seventy medical students and internal medicine residents completed a within-subject design using Mouselab, a computer program that allows the information-acquisition process to be examined. We examined highly numerate physician trainees’ decision processes, strategy, and their ability to pick the cheapest drug plan—as price was deemed the most important factor in Medicare beneficiaries’ plan choice—from either 3 or 9 drug plans. Before adjustment, participants were significantly more likely to identify the lowest cost plan when facing three versus nine choices (67.3% vs. 32.8%, p<0.01) and paid significantly less in excess premiums ($60.00 vs. $128.51, p<0.01). Compared to the three-plan condition, in the nine-plan condition participants spent significantly less time acquiring information on each attribute (p<0.05) and were more likely to employ decision strategies focusing on comparing alternate plans across a single attribute (search pattern, p<0.05). After adjusting for decision process and strategy, numeracy, and amount of medical training, the odds were 10.75 times higher that trainees would choose the lowest cost Medicare Part D drug plan when facing 3 versus 9 drug plans (p<0.05). Although employing more efficient search strategies in the complex choice environment, physician trainees experienced similar difficulty in choosing the lowest cost prescription drug plans as older patients do. Our results add further evidence that simplifications to the Medicare Part D decision environment are needed and suggest physicians’ role in their patients’ Part D choices may be most productive when assisting seniors with forecasting their expected medication needs and then referring them to the Medicare website or helpline. Public Library of Science 2013-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3792159/ /pubmed/24116209 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077096 Text en © 2013 Barnes et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Barnes, Andrew J.
Hanoch, Yaniv
Martynenko, Melissa
Wood, Stacey
Rice, Thomas
Federman, Alex D.
Physician Trainees’ Decision Making and Information Processing: Choice Size and Medicare Part D
title Physician Trainees’ Decision Making and Information Processing: Choice Size and Medicare Part D
title_full Physician Trainees’ Decision Making and Information Processing: Choice Size and Medicare Part D
title_fullStr Physician Trainees’ Decision Making and Information Processing: Choice Size and Medicare Part D
title_full_unstemmed Physician Trainees’ Decision Making and Information Processing: Choice Size and Medicare Part D
title_short Physician Trainees’ Decision Making and Information Processing: Choice Size and Medicare Part D
title_sort physician trainees’ decision making and information processing: choice size and medicare part d
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3792159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24116209
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077096
work_keys_str_mv AT barnesandrewj physiciantraineesdecisionmakingandinformationprocessingchoicesizeandmedicarepartd
AT hanochyaniv physiciantraineesdecisionmakingandinformationprocessingchoicesizeandmedicarepartd
AT martynenkomelissa physiciantraineesdecisionmakingandinformationprocessingchoicesizeandmedicarepartd
AT woodstacey physiciantraineesdecisionmakingandinformationprocessingchoicesizeandmedicarepartd
AT ricethomas physiciantraineesdecisionmakingandinformationprocessingchoicesizeandmedicarepartd
AT federmanalexd physiciantraineesdecisionmakingandinformationprocessingchoicesizeandmedicarepartd