Cargando…

Risk Management in Magnetic Resonance: Failure Mode, Effects, and Criticality Analysis

The aim of the study was to perform a risk management procedure in “Magnetic Resonance Examination” process in order to identify the critical phases and sources of radiological errors and to identify potential improvement projects including procedures, tests, and checks to reduce the error occurrenc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Petrillo, Antonella, Fusco, Roberta, Granata, Vincenza, Filice, Salvatore, Raiano, Nicola, Amato, Daniela Maria, Zirpoli, Maria, di Finizio, Alessandro, Sansone, Mario, Russo, Anna, Covelli, Eugenio Maria, Pedicini, Tonino, Triassi, Maria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3792532/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24171173
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/763186
_version_ 1782286858181410816
author Petrillo, Antonella
Fusco, Roberta
Granata, Vincenza
Filice, Salvatore
Raiano, Nicola
Amato, Daniela Maria
Zirpoli, Maria
di Finizio, Alessandro
Sansone, Mario
Russo, Anna
Covelli, Eugenio Maria
Pedicini, Tonino
Triassi, Maria
author_facet Petrillo, Antonella
Fusco, Roberta
Granata, Vincenza
Filice, Salvatore
Raiano, Nicola
Amato, Daniela Maria
Zirpoli, Maria
di Finizio, Alessandro
Sansone, Mario
Russo, Anna
Covelli, Eugenio Maria
Pedicini, Tonino
Triassi, Maria
author_sort Petrillo, Antonella
collection PubMed
description The aim of the study was to perform a risk management procedure in “Magnetic Resonance Examination” process in order to identify the critical phases and sources of radiological errors and to identify potential improvement projects including procedures, tests, and checks to reduce the error occurrence risk. In this study we used the proactive analysis “Failure Mode Effects Criticality Analysis,” a qualitative and quantitative risk management procedure; has calculated Priority Risk Index (PRI) for each activity of the process; have identified, on the PRI basis, the most critical activities and, for them, have defined improvement projects; and have recalculated the PRI after implementation of improvement projects for each activity. Time stop and audits are performed in order to control the new procedures. The results showed that the most critical tasks of “Magnetic Resonance Examination” process were the reception of the patient, the patient schedule drafting, the closing examination, and the organization of activities. Four improvement projects have been defined and executed. PRI evaluation after improvement projects implementation has shown that the risk decreased significantly following the implementation of procedures and controls defined in improvement projects, resulting in a reduction of the PRI between 43% and 100%.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3792532
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37925322013-10-29 Risk Management in Magnetic Resonance: Failure Mode, Effects, and Criticality Analysis Petrillo, Antonella Fusco, Roberta Granata, Vincenza Filice, Salvatore Raiano, Nicola Amato, Daniela Maria Zirpoli, Maria di Finizio, Alessandro Sansone, Mario Russo, Anna Covelli, Eugenio Maria Pedicini, Tonino Triassi, Maria Biomed Res Int Research Article The aim of the study was to perform a risk management procedure in “Magnetic Resonance Examination” process in order to identify the critical phases and sources of radiological errors and to identify potential improvement projects including procedures, tests, and checks to reduce the error occurrence risk. In this study we used the proactive analysis “Failure Mode Effects Criticality Analysis,” a qualitative and quantitative risk management procedure; has calculated Priority Risk Index (PRI) for each activity of the process; have identified, on the PRI basis, the most critical activities and, for them, have defined improvement projects; and have recalculated the PRI after implementation of improvement projects for each activity. Time stop and audits are performed in order to control the new procedures. The results showed that the most critical tasks of “Magnetic Resonance Examination” process were the reception of the patient, the patient schedule drafting, the closing examination, and the organization of activities. Four improvement projects have been defined and executed. PRI evaluation after improvement projects implementation has shown that the risk decreased significantly following the implementation of procedures and controls defined in improvement projects, resulting in a reduction of the PRI between 43% and 100%. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3792532/ /pubmed/24171173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/763186 Text en Copyright © 2013 Antonella Petrillo et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Petrillo, Antonella
Fusco, Roberta
Granata, Vincenza
Filice, Salvatore
Raiano, Nicola
Amato, Daniela Maria
Zirpoli, Maria
di Finizio, Alessandro
Sansone, Mario
Russo, Anna
Covelli, Eugenio Maria
Pedicini, Tonino
Triassi, Maria
Risk Management in Magnetic Resonance: Failure Mode, Effects, and Criticality Analysis
title Risk Management in Magnetic Resonance: Failure Mode, Effects, and Criticality Analysis
title_full Risk Management in Magnetic Resonance: Failure Mode, Effects, and Criticality Analysis
title_fullStr Risk Management in Magnetic Resonance: Failure Mode, Effects, and Criticality Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Risk Management in Magnetic Resonance: Failure Mode, Effects, and Criticality Analysis
title_short Risk Management in Magnetic Resonance: Failure Mode, Effects, and Criticality Analysis
title_sort risk management in magnetic resonance: failure mode, effects, and criticality analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3792532/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24171173
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/763186
work_keys_str_mv AT petrilloantonella riskmanagementinmagneticresonancefailuremodeeffectsandcriticalityanalysis
AT fuscoroberta riskmanagementinmagneticresonancefailuremodeeffectsandcriticalityanalysis
AT granatavincenza riskmanagementinmagneticresonancefailuremodeeffectsandcriticalityanalysis
AT filicesalvatore riskmanagementinmagneticresonancefailuremodeeffectsandcriticalityanalysis
AT raianonicola riskmanagementinmagneticresonancefailuremodeeffectsandcriticalityanalysis
AT amatodanielamaria riskmanagementinmagneticresonancefailuremodeeffectsandcriticalityanalysis
AT zirpolimaria riskmanagementinmagneticresonancefailuremodeeffectsandcriticalityanalysis
AT difinizioalessandro riskmanagementinmagneticresonancefailuremodeeffectsandcriticalityanalysis
AT sansonemario riskmanagementinmagneticresonancefailuremodeeffectsandcriticalityanalysis
AT russoanna riskmanagementinmagneticresonancefailuremodeeffectsandcriticalityanalysis
AT covellieugeniomaria riskmanagementinmagneticresonancefailuremodeeffectsandcriticalityanalysis
AT pedicinitonino riskmanagementinmagneticresonancefailuremodeeffectsandcriticalityanalysis
AT triassimaria riskmanagementinmagneticresonancefailuremodeeffectsandcriticalityanalysis