Cargando…

Descemet’s stripping and non-Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty for microcornea using 6.0 mm donor grafts

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this paper is to report our experience of Descemet’s stripping and non-Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK/nDSAEK) for microcorneas using 6.0 mm donor grafts. METHODS: Three eyes of two patients (a 56-year-old woman and a 59-year-old woman) with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yokogawa, Hideaki, Kobayashi, Akira, Yamazaki, Natsuko, Ueta, Yoshiki, Hashimoto, Yoshihiro, Tachi, Naoko, Sugiyama, Kazuhisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3792923/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24109176
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S50299
_version_ 1782286899580239872
author Yokogawa, Hideaki
Kobayashi, Akira
Yamazaki, Natsuko
Ueta, Yoshiki
Hashimoto, Yoshihiro
Tachi, Naoko
Sugiyama, Kazuhisa
author_facet Yokogawa, Hideaki
Kobayashi, Akira
Yamazaki, Natsuko
Ueta, Yoshiki
Hashimoto, Yoshihiro
Tachi, Naoko
Sugiyama, Kazuhisa
author_sort Yokogawa, Hideaki
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this paper is to report our experience of Descemet’s stripping and non-Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK/nDSAEK) for microcorneas using 6.0 mm donor grafts. METHODS: Three eyes of two patients (a 56-year-old woman and a 59-year-old woman) with microcornea and suffering from bullous keratopathy were treated with either DSAEK or nDSAEK. A small donor graft (6.0 mm) was inserted into the anterior chamber using a double glide (Busin glide and intraocular lens sheet glide) donor insertion technique. Both patients were followed for at least 12 months. Clinical outcomes, including intraoperative and postoperative complications, visual acuity, and endothelial cell density were evaluated. RESULTS: In all three cases (100%), no intraoperative complications were noted. In one case with a flat keratometry value (32.13 D), a partial donor detachment was noted one day postoperatively, but it was reattached by rebubbling. In another case, rejection was noted 8 months postoperatively, but treatment with systemic corticosteroids was successful. A clear cornea remained in all three cases (100%), with best-corrected visual acuity greater than 20/100 (mean 20/50) at 12 months. Mean postoperative endothelial cell counts were 2,603 ± 18 cells/mm(2) at 6 months (7.4% decrease from preoperative donor cell counts) and 1,799 ± 556 cells/mm(2) at 12 months (36.5% decrease). CONCLUSION: We report for the first time the successful use of a small donor graft (6.0 mm) for DSAEK/nDSAEK in cases of microcornea. Additional stud ies using a large number of patients are required to evaluate fully the potential advantages and drawbacks of small diameter donor grafts for microcornea.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3792923
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37929232013-10-09 Descemet’s stripping and non-Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty for microcornea using 6.0 mm donor grafts Yokogawa, Hideaki Kobayashi, Akira Yamazaki, Natsuko Ueta, Yoshiki Hashimoto, Yoshihiro Tachi, Naoko Sugiyama, Kazuhisa Clin Ophthalmol Case Series BACKGROUND: The purpose of this paper is to report our experience of Descemet’s stripping and non-Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK/nDSAEK) for microcorneas using 6.0 mm donor grafts. METHODS: Three eyes of two patients (a 56-year-old woman and a 59-year-old woman) with microcornea and suffering from bullous keratopathy were treated with either DSAEK or nDSAEK. A small donor graft (6.0 mm) was inserted into the anterior chamber using a double glide (Busin glide and intraocular lens sheet glide) donor insertion technique. Both patients were followed for at least 12 months. Clinical outcomes, including intraoperative and postoperative complications, visual acuity, and endothelial cell density were evaluated. RESULTS: In all three cases (100%), no intraoperative complications were noted. In one case with a flat keratometry value (32.13 D), a partial donor detachment was noted one day postoperatively, but it was reattached by rebubbling. In another case, rejection was noted 8 months postoperatively, but treatment with systemic corticosteroids was successful. A clear cornea remained in all three cases (100%), with best-corrected visual acuity greater than 20/100 (mean 20/50) at 12 months. Mean postoperative endothelial cell counts were 2,603 ± 18 cells/mm(2) at 6 months (7.4% decrease from preoperative donor cell counts) and 1,799 ± 556 cells/mm(2) at 12 months (36.5% decrease). CONCLUSION: We report for the first time the successful use of a small donor graft (6.0 mm) for DSAEK/nDSAEK in cases of microcornea. Additional stud ies using a large number of patients are required to evaluate fully the potential advantages and drawbacks of small diameter donor grafts for microcornea. Dove Medical Press 2013 2013-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3792923/ /pubmed/24109176 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S50299 Text en © 2013 Yokogawa et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Case Series
Yokogawa, Hideaki
Kobayashi, Akira
Yamazaki, Natsuko
Ueta, Yoshiki
Hashimoto, Yoshihiro
Tachi, Naoko
Sugiyama, Kazuhisa
Descemet’s stripping and non-Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty for microcornea using 6.0 mm donor grafts
title Descemet’s stripping and non-Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty for microcornea using 6.0 mm donor grafts
title_full Descemet’s stripping and non-Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty for microcornea using 6.0 mm donor grafts
title_fullStr Descemet’s stripping and non-Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty for microcornea using 6.0 mm donor grafts
title_full_unstemmed Descemet’s stripping and non-Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty for microcornea using 6.0 mm donor grafts
title_short Descemet’s stripping and non-Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty for microcornea using 6.0 mm donor grafts
title_sort descemet’s stripping and non-descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty for microcornea using 6.0 mm donor grafts
topic Case Series
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3792923/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24109176
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S50299
work_keys_str_mv AT yokogawahideaki descemetsstrippingandnondescemetsstrippingautomatedendothelialkeratoplastyformicrocorneausing60mmdonorgrafts
AT kobayashiakira descemetsstrippingandnondescemetsstrippingautomatedendothelialkeratoplastyformicrocorneausing60mmdonorgrafts
AT yamazakinatsuko descemetsstrippingandnondescemetsstrippingautomatedendothelialkeratoplastyformicrocorneausing60mmdonorgrafts
AT uetayoshiki descemetsstrippingandnondescemetsstrippingautomatedendothelialkeratoplastyformicrocorneausing60mmdonorgrafts
AT hashimotoyoshihiro descemetsstrippingandnondescemetsstrippingautomatedendothelialkeratoplastyformicrocorneausing60mmdonorgrafts
AT tachinaoko descemetsstrippingandnondescemetsstrippingautomatedendothelialkeratoplastyformicrocorneausing60mmdonorgrafts
AT sugiyamakazuhisa descemetsstrippingandnondescemetsstrippingautomatedendothelialkeratoplastyformicrocorneausing60mmdonorgrafts