Cargando…

Accuracy of Glenoid Component Placement in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty and Its Effect on Clinical and Radiological Outcome in a Retrospective, Longitudinal, Monocentric Open Study

BACKGROUND: The success of Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (TSA) is believed to depend on the restoration of the natural anatomy of the joint and a key development has been the introduction of modular humeral components to more accurately restore the patient’s anatomy. However, there are no peer-reviewe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gregory, Thomas M., Sankey, Andrew, Augereau, Bernard, Vandenbussche, Eric, Amis, Andrew, Emery, Roger, Hansen, Ulrich
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3793002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24116075
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075791
_version_ 1782286918889766912
author Gregory, Thomas M.
Sankey, Andrew
Augereau, Bernard
Vandenbussche, Eric
Amis, Andrew
Emery, Roger
Hansen, Ulrich
author_facet Gregory, Thomas M.
Sankey, Andrew
Augereau, Bernard
Vandenbussche, Eric
Amis, Andrew
Emery, Roger
Hansen, Ulrich
author_sort Gregory, Thomas M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The success of Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (TSA) is believed to depend on the restoration of the natural anatomy of the joint and a key development has been the introduction of modular humeral components to more accurately restore the patient’s anatomy. However, there are no peer-reviewed studies that have reported the degree of glenoid component mal-position achieved in clinical practice and the clinical outcome of such mal-position. The main purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of glenoid implant positioning during TSA and to relate it to the radiological (occurrence of radiolucent lines and osteolysis on CT) and clinical outcomes. METHODS: 68 TSAs were assessed with a mean follow-up of 38+/−27 months. The clinical evaluation consisted of measuring the mobility as well as of the Constant Score. The radiological evaluation was performed on CT-scans in which metal artefacts had been eliminated. From the CT-scans radiolucent lines and osteolysis were assessed. The positions of the glenoid and humeral components were also measured from the CT scans. RESULTS: Four position glenoid component parameters were calculated The posterior version (6°±12°; mean ± SD), the superior tilt (12°±17°), the rotation of the implant relative to the scapular plane (3°±14°) and the off-set distance of the centre of the glenoid implant from the scapular plane (6±4 mm). An inferiorly inclined implant was found to be associated with higher levels of radiolucent lines while retroversion and non-neutral rotation were associated with a reduced range of motion. CONCLUSION: this study demonstrates that glenoid implants of anatomic TSA are poorly positioned and that this malposition has a direct effect on the clinical and radiological outcome. Thus, further developments in glenoid implantation techniques are required to enable the surgeon to achieve a desired implant position and outcome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3793002
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37930022013-10-10 Accuracy of Glenoid Component Placement in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty and Its Effect on Clinical and Radiological Outcome in a Retrospective, Longitudinal, Monocentric Open Study Gregory, Thomas M. Sankey, Andrew Augereau, Bernard Vandenbussche, Eric Amis, Andrew Emery, Roger Hansen, Ulrich PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The success of Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (TSA) is believed to depend on the restoration of the natural anatomy of the joint and a key development has been the introduction of modular humeral components to more accurately restore the patient’s anatomy. However, there are no peer-reviewed studies that have reported the degree of glenoid component mal-position achieved in clinical practice and the clinical outcome of such mal-position. The main purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of glenoid implant positioning during TSA and to relate it to the radiological (occurrence of radiolucent lines and osteolysis on CT) and clinical outcomes. METHODS: 68 TSAs were assessed with a mean follow-up of 38+/−27 months. The clinical evaluation consisted of measuring the mobility as well as of the Constant Score. The radiological evaluation was performed on CT-scans in which metal artefacts had been eliminated. From the CT-scans radiolucent lines and osteolysis were assessed. The positions of the glenoid and humeral components were also measured from the CT scans. RESULTS: Four position glenoid component parameters were calculated The posterior version (6°±12°; mean ± SD), the superior tilt (12°±17°), the rotation of the implant relative to the scapular plane (3°±14°) and the off-set distance of the centre of the glenoid implant from the scapular plane (6±4 mm). An inferiorly inclined implant was found to be associated with higher levels of radiolucent lines while retroversion and non-neutral rotation were associated with a reduced range of motion. CONCLUSION: this study demonstrates that glenoid implants of anatomic TSA are poorly positioned and that this malposition has a direct effect on the clinical and radiological outcome. Thus, further developments in glenoid implantation techniques are required to enable the surgeon to achieve a desired implant position and outcome. Public Library of Science 2013-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3793002/ /pubmed/24116075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075791 Text en © 2013 Gregory et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gregory, Thomas M.
Sankey, Andrew
Augereau, Bernard
Vandenbussche, Eric
Amis, Andrew
Emery, Roger
Hansen, Ulrich
Accuracy of Glenoid Component Placement in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty and Its Effect on Clinical and Radiological Outcome in a Retrospective, Longitudinal, Monocentric Open Study
title Accuracy of Glenoid Component Placement in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty and Its Effect on Clinical and Radiological Outcome in a Retrospective, Longitudinal, Monocentric Open Study
title_full Accuracy of Glenoid Component Placement in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty and Its Effect on Clinical and Radiological Outcome in a Retrospective, Longitudinal, Monocentric Open Study
title_fullStr Accuracy of Glenoid Component Placement in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty and Its Effect on Clinical and Radiological Outcome in a Retrospective, Longitudinal, Monocentric Open Study
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of Glenoid Component Placement in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty and Its Effect on Clinical and Radiological Outcome in a Retrospective, Longitudinal, Monocentric Open Study
title_short Accuracy of Glenoid Component Placement in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty and Its Effect on Clinical and Radiological Outcome in a Retrospective, Longitudinal, Monocentric Open Study
title_sort accuracy of glenoid component placement in total shoulder arthroplasty and its effect on clinical and radiological outcome in a retrospective, longitudinal, monocentric open study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3793002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24116075
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075791
work_keys_str_mv AT gregorythomasm accuracyofglenoidcomponentplacementintotalshoulderarthroplastyanditseffectonclinicalandradiologicaloutcomeinaretrospectivelongitudinalmonocentricopenstudy
AT sankeyandrew accuracyofglenoidcomponentplacementintotalshoulderarthroplastyanditseffectonclinicalandradiologicaloutcomeinaretrospectivelongitudinalmonocentricopenstudy
AT augereaubernard accuracyofglenoidcomponentplacementintotalshoulderarthroplastyanditseffectonclinicalandradiologicaloutcomeinaretrospectivelongitudinalmonocentricopenstudy
AT vandenbusscheeric accuracyofglenoidcomponentplacementintotalshoulderarthroplastyanditseffectonclinicalandradiologicaloutcomeinaretrospectivelongitudinalmonocentricopenstudy
AT amisandrew accuracyofglenoidcomponentplacementintotalshoulderarthroplastyanditseffectonclinicalandradiologicaloutcomeinaretrospectivelongitudinalmonocentricopenstudy
AT emeryroger accuracyofglenoidcomponentplacementintotalshoulderarthroplastyanditseffectonclinicalandradiologicaloutcomeinaretrospectivelongitudinalmonocentricopenstudy
AT hansenulrich accuracyofglenoidcomponentplacementintotalshoulderarthroplastyanditseffectonclinicalandradiologicaloutcomeinaretrospectivelongitudinalmonocentricopenstudy