Cargando…
Accuracy of Glenoid Component Placement in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty and Its Effect on Clinical and Radiological Outcome in a Retrospective, Longitudinal, Monocentric Open Study
BACKGROUND: The success of Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (TSA) is believed to depend on the restoration of the natural anatomy of the joint and a key development has been the introduction of modular humeral components to more accurately restore the patient’s anatomy. However, there are no peer-reviewe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3793002/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24116075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075791 |
_version_ | 1782286918889766912 |
---|---|
author | Gregory, Thomas M. Sankey, Andrew Augereau, Bernard Vandenbussche, Eric Amis, Andrew Emery, Roger Hansen, Ulrich |
author_facet | Gregory, Thomas M. Sankey, Andrew Augereau, Bernard Vandenbussche, Eric Amis, Andrew Emery, Roger Hansen, Ulrich |
author_sort | Gregory, Thomas M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The success of Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (TSA) is believed to depend on the restoration of the natural anatomy of the joint and a key development has been the introduction of modular humeral components to more accurately restore the patient’s anatomy. However, there are no peer-reviewed studies that have reported the degree of glenoid component mal-position achieved in clinical practice and the clinical outcome of such mal-position. The main purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of glenoid implant positioning during TSA and to relate it to the radiological (occurrence of radiolucent lines and osteolysis on CT) and clinical outcomes. METHODS: 68 TSAs were assessed with a mean follow-up of 38+/−27 months. The clinical evaluation consisted of measuring the mobility as well as of the Constant Score. The radiological evaluation was performed on CT-scans in which metal artefacts had been eliminated. From the CT-scans radiolucent lines and osteolysis were assessed. The positions of the glenoid and humeral components were also measured from the CT scans. RESULTS: Four position glenoid component parameters were calculated The posterior version (6°±12°; mean ± SD), the superior tilt (12°±17°), the rotation of the implant relative to the scapular plane (3°±14°) and the off-set distance of the centre of the glenoid implant from the scapular plane (6±4 mm). An inferiorly inclined implant was found to be associated with higher levels of radiolucent lines while retroversion and non-neutral rotation were associated with a reduced range of motion. CONCLUSION: this study demonstrates that glenoid implants of anatomic TSA are poorly positioned and that this malposition has a direct effect on the clinical and radiological outcome. Thus, further developments in glenoid implantation techniques are required to enable the surgeon to achieve a desired implant position and outcome. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3793002 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37930022013-10-10 Accuracy of Glenoid Component Placement in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty and Its Effect on Clinical and Radiological Outcome in a Retrospective, Longitudinal, Monocentric Open Study Gregory, Thomas M. Sankey, Andrew Augereau, Bernard Vandenbussche, Eric Amis, Andrew Emery, Roger Hansen, Ulrich PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The success of Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (TSA) is believed to depend on the restoration of the natural anatomy of the joint and a key development has been the introduction of modular humeral components to more accurately restore the patient’s anatomy. However, there are no peer-reviewed studies that have reported the degree of glenoid component mal-position achieved in clinical practice and the clinical outcome of such mal-position. The main purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of glenoid implant positioning during TSA and to relate it to the radiological (occurrence of radiolucent lines and osteolysis on CT) and clinical outcomes. METHODS: 68 TSAs were assessed with a mean follow-up of 38+/−27 months. The clinical evaluation consisted of measuring the mobility as well as of the Constant Score. The radiological evaluation was performed on CT-scans in which metal artefacts had been eliminated. From the CT-scans radiolucent lines and osteolysis were assessed. The positions of the glenoid and humeral components were also measured from the CT scans. RESULTS: Four position glenoid component parameters were calculated The posterior version (6°±12°; mean ± SD), the superior tilt (12°±17°), the rotation of the implant relative to the scapular plane (3°±14°) and the off-set distance of the centre of the glenoid implant from the scapular plane (6±4 mm). An inferiorly inclined implant was found to be associated with higher levels of radiolucent lines while retroversion and non-neutral rotation were associated with a reduced range of motion. CONCLUSION: this study demonstrates that glenoid implants of anatomic TSA are poorly positioned and that this malposition has a direct effect on the clinical and radiological outcome. Thus, further developments in glenoid implantation techniques are required to enable the surgeon to achieve a desired implant position and outcome. Public Library of Science 2013-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3793002/ /pubmed/24116075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075791 Text en © 2013 Gregory et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Gregory, Thomas M. Sankey, Andrew Augereau, Bernard Vandenbussche, Eric Amis, Andrew Emery, Roger Hansen, Ulrich Accuracy of Glenoid Component Placement in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty and Its Effect on Clinical and Radiological Outcome in a Retrospective, Longitudinal, Monocentric Open Study |
title | Accuracy of Glenoid Component Placement in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty and Its Effect on Clinical and Radiological Outcome in a Retrospective, Longitudinal, Monocentric Open Study |
title_full | Accuracy of Glenoid Component Placement in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty and Its Effect on Clinical and Radiological Outcome in a Retrospective, Longitudinal, Monocentric Open Study |
title_fullStr | Accuracy of Glenoid Component Placement in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty and Its Effect on Clinical and Radiological Outcome in a Retrospective, Longitudinal, Monocentric Open Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Accuracy of Glenoid Component Placement in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty and Its Effect on Clinical and Radiological Outcome in a Retrospective, Longitudinal, Monocentric Open Study |
title_short | Accuracy of Glenoid Component Placement in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty and Its Effect on Clinical and Radiological Outcome in a Retrospective, Longitudinal, Monocentric Open Study |
title_sort | accuracy of glenoid component placement in total shoulder arthroplasty and its effect on clinical and radiological outcome in a retrospective, longitudinal, monocentric open study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3793002/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24116075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075791 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gregorythomasm accuracyofglenoidcomponentplacementintotalshoulderarthroplastyanditseffectonclinicalandradiologicaloutcomeinaretrospectivelongitudinalmonocentricopenstudy AT sankeyandrew accuracyofglenoidcomponentplacementintotalshoulderarthroplastyanditseffectonclinicalandradiologicaloutcomeinaretrospectivelongitudinalmonocentricopenstudy AT augereaubernard accuracyofglenoidcomponentplacementintotalshoulderarthroplastyanditseffectonclinicalandradiologicaloutcomeinaretrospectivelongitudinalmonocentricopenstudy AT vandenbusscheeric accuracyofglenoidcomponentplacementintotalshoulderarthroplastyanditseffectonclinicalandradiologicaloutcomeinaretrospectivelongitudinalmonocentricopenstudy AT amisandrew accuracyofglenoidcomponentplacementintotalshoulderarthroplastyanditseffectonclinicalandradiologicaloutcomeinaretrospectivelongitudinalmonocentricopenstudy AT emeryroger accuracyofglenoidcomponentplacementintotalshoulderarthroplastyanditseffectonclinicalandradiologicaloutcomeinaretrospectivelongitudinalmonocentricopenstudy AT hansenulrich accuracyofglenoidcomponentplacementintotalshoulderarthroplastyanditseffectonclinicalandradiologicaloutcomeinaretrospectivelongitudinalmonocentricopenstudy |