Cargando…

The evolution of selective estrogen receptor modulators in osteoporosis therapy

Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), which exhibit estrogen receptor agonist or antagonist activity based on the target tissue, have evolved through multiple generations for the prevention and/or treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. An ideal SERM would protect bone without stimulatin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Hadji, P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Informa Healthcare 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3793274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22853318
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/13697137.2012.688079
_version_ 1782286940802908160
author Hadji, P.
author_facet Hadji, P.
author_sort Hadji, P.
collection PubMed
description Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), which exhibit estrogen receptor agonist or antagonist activity based on the target tissue, have evolved through multiple generations for the prevention and/or treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. An ideal SERM would protect bone without stimulating the breast or endometrium. Raloxifene, lasofoxifene, and bazedoxifene have demonstrated unique preclinical profiles. Raloxifene, lasofoxifene, and bazedoxifene have shown significant reduction in the risk of vertebral fracture and improvement in bone mineral density versus placebo in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Raloxifene has been shown to reduce the risk of non-vertebral fractures in women with severe prevalent fractures at baseline. Lasofoxifene 0.5 mg, but not lasofoxifene 0.25 mg, has shown reduction in the incidence of non-vertebral fractures. Bazedoxifene 20 mg has been associated with a significant reduction in the risk of non-vertebral fracture versus placebo and raloxifene 60 mg in women at higher baseline fracture risk. Neither raloxifene, lasofoxifene, nor bazedoxifene has shown an increase in the incidence of endometrial hyperplasia or carcinoma. All SERMs have been associated with increased venous thromboembolic events and hot flushes. SERMs are effective alternatives for women who cannot tolerate or are unwilling to take bisphosphonates and may be appropriate for women at higher risk of fracture, particularly younger women who expect to remain on therapy for many years and are concerned about the long-term safety of bisphosphonates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3793274
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Informa Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37932742013-10-11 The evolution of selective estrogen receptor modulators in osteoporosis therapy Hadji, P. Climacteric Reviews Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), which exhibit estrogen receptor agonist or antagonist activity based on the target tissue, have evolved through multiple generations for the prevention and/or treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. An ideal SERM would protect bone without stimulating the breast or endometrium. Raloxifene, lasofoxifene, and bazedoxifene have demonstrated unique preclinical profiles. Raloxifene, lasofoxifene, and bazedoxifene have shown significant reduction in the risk of vertebral fracture and improvement in bone mineral density versus placebo in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Raloxifene has been shown to reduce the risk of non-vertebral fractures in women with severe prevalent fractures at baseline. Lasofoxifene 0.5 mg, but not lasofoxifene 0.25 mg, has shown reduction in the incidence of non-vertebral fractures. Bazedoxifene 20 mg has been associated with a significant reduction in the risk of non-vertebral fracture versus placebo and raloxifene 60 mg in women at higher baseline fracture risk. Neither raloxifene, lasofoxifene, nor bazedoxifene has shown an increase in the incidence of endometrial hyperplasia or carcinoma. All SERMs have been associated with increased venous thromboembolic events and hot flushes. SERMs are effective alternatives for women who cannot tolerate or are unwilling to take bisphosphonates and may be appropriate for women at higher risk of fracture, particularly younger women who expect to remain on therapy for many years and are concerned about the long-term safety of bisphosphonates. Informa Healthcare 2012-12 2012-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3793274/ /pubmed/22853318 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/13697137.2012.688079 Text en © 2012 International Menopause Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the source is credited.
spellingShingle Reviews
Hadji, P.
The evolution of selective estrogen receptor modulators in osteoporosis therapy
title The evolution of selective estrogen receptor modulators in osteoporosis therapy
title_full The evolution of selective estrogen receptor modulators in osteoporosis therapy
title_fullStr The evolution of selective estrogen receptor modulators in osteoporosis therapy
title_full_unstemmed The evolution of selective estrogen receptor modulators in osteoporosis therapy
title_short The evolution of selective estrogen receptor modulators in osteoporosis therapy
title_sort evolution of selective estrogen receptor modulators in osteoporosis therapy
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3793274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22853318
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/13697137.2012.688079
work_keys_str_mv AT hadjip theevolutionofselectiveestrogenreceptormodulatorsinosteoporosistherapy
AT hadjip evolutionofselectiveestrogenreceptormodulatorsinosteoporosistherapy