Cargando…

Do Power Lines and Protected Areas Present a Catch-22 Situation for Cape Vultures (Gyps coprotheres)?

Cape vulture Gyps coprotheres populations have declined across their range due to multiple anthropogenic threats. Their susceptibility to fatal collisions with the expanding power line network and the prevalence of carcasses contaminated with illegal poisons and other threats outside protected areas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Phipps, W. Louis, Wolter, Kerri, Michael, Michael D., MacTavish, Lynne M., Yarnell, Richard W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3793913/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24137496
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076794
_version_ 1782287139553148928
author Phipps, W. Louis
Wolter, Kerri
Michael, Michael D.
MacTavish, Lynne M.
Yarnell, Richard W.
author_facet Phipps, W. Louis
Wolter, Kerri
Michael, Michael D.
MacTavish, Lynne M.
Yarnell, Richard W.
author_sort Phipps, W. Louis
collection PubMed
description Cape vulture Gyps coprotheres populations have declined across their range due to multiple anthropogenic threats. Their susceptibility to fatal collisions with the expanding power line network and the prevalence of carcasses contaminated with illegal poisons and other threats outside protected areas are thought to be the primary drivers of declines in southern Africa. We used GPS-GSM units to track the movements and delineate the home ranges of five adult (mean ±SD minimum convex polygon area  =  121,655±90,845 km(2)) and four immature (mean ±SD minimum convex polygon area  =  492,300±259,427 km(2)) Cape vultures to investigate the influence of power lines and their use of protected areas. The vultures travelled more than 1,000 km from the capture site and collectively entered five different countries in southern Africa. Their movement patterns and core foraging ranges were closely associated with the spatial distribution of transmission power lines and we present evidence that the construction of power lines has allowed the species to extend its range to areas previously devoid of suitable perches. The distribution of locations of known Cape vulture mortalities caused by interactions with power lines corresponded to the core ranges of the tracked vultures. Although some of the vultures regularly roosted at breeding colonies located inside protected areas the majority of foraging activity took place on unprotected farmland. Their ability to travel vast distances very quickly and the high proportion of time they spend in the vicinity of power lines and outside protected areas make Cape vultures especially vulnerable to negative interactions with the expanding power line network and the full range of threats across the region. Co-ordinated cross-border conservation strategies beyond the protected area network will therefore be necessary to ensure the future survival of threatened vultures in Africa.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3793913
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37939132013-10-17 Do Power Lines and Protected Areas Present a Catch-22 Situation for Cape Vultures (Gyps coprotheres)? Phipps, W. Louis Wolter, Kerri Michael, Michael D. MacTavish, Lynne M. Yarnell, Richard W. PLoS One Research Article Cape vulture Gyps coprotheres populations have declined across their range due to multiple anthropogenic threats. Their susceptibility to fatal collisions with the expanding power line network and the prevalence of carcasses contaminated with illegal poisons and other threats outside protected areas are thought to be the primary drivers of declines in southern Africa. We used GPS-GSM units to track the movements and delineate the home ranges of five adult (mean ±SD minimum convex polygon area  =  121,655±90,845 km(2)) and four immature (mean ±SD minimum convex polygon area  =  492,300±259,427 km(2)) Cape vultures to investigate the influence of power lines and their use of protected areas. The vultures travelled more than 1,000 km from the capture site and collectively entered five different countries in southern Africa. Their movement patterns and core foraging ranges were closely associated with the spatial distribution of transmission power lines and we present evidence that the construction of power lines has allowed the species to extend its range to areas previously devoid of suitable perches. The distribution of locations of known Cape vulture mortalities caused by interactions with power lines corresponded to the core ranges of the tracked vultures. Although some of the vultures regularly roosted at breeding colonies located inside protected areas the majority of foraging activity took place on unprotected farmland. Their ability to travel vast distances very quickly and the high proportion of time they spend in the vicinity of power lines and outside protected areas make Cape vultures especially vulnerable to negative interactions with the expanding power line network and the full range of threats across the region. Co-ordinated cross-border conservation strategies beyond the protected area network will therefore be necessary to ensure the future survival of threatened vultures in Africa. Public Library of Science 2013-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3793913/ /pubmed/24137496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076794 Text en © 2013 Phipps et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Phipps, W. Louis
Wolter, Kerri
Michael, Michael D.
MacTavish, Lynne M.
Yarnell, Richard W.
Do Power Lines and Protected Areas Present a Catch-22 Situation for Cape Vultures (Gyps coprotheres)?
title Do Power Lines and Protected Areas Present a Catch-22 Situation for Cape Vultures (Gyps coprotheres)?
title_full Do Power Lines and Protected Areas Present a Catch-22 Situation for Cape Vultures (Gyps coprotheres)?
title_fullStr Do Power Lines and Protected Areas Present a Catch-22 Situation for Cape Vultures (Gyps coprotheres)?
title_full_unstemmed Do Power Lines and Protected Areas Present a Catch-22 Situation for Cape Vultures (Gyps coprotheres)?
title_short Do Power Lines and Protected Areas Present a Catch-22 Situation for Cape Vultures (Gyps coprotheres)?
title_sort do power lines and protected areas present a catch-22 situation for cape vultures (gyps coprotheres)?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3793913/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24137496
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076794
work_keys_str_mv AT phippswlouis dopowerlinesandprotectedareaspresentacatch22situationforcapevulturesgypscoprotheres
AT wolterkerri dopowerlinesandprotectedareaspresentacatch22situationforcapevulturesgypscoprotheres
AT michaelmichaeld dopowerlinesandprotectedareaspresentacatch22situationforcapevulturesgypscoprotheres
AT mactavishlynnem dopowerlinesandprotectedareaspresentacatch22situationforcapevulturesgypscoprotheres
AT yarnellrichardw dopowerlinesandprotectedareaspresentacatch22situationforcapevulturesgypscoprotheres