Cargando…

What Lies Beneath: Sub-Articular Long Bone Shape Scaling in Eutherian Mammals and Saurischian Dinosaurs Suggests Different Locomotor Adaptations for Gigantism

Eutherian mammals and saurischian dinosaurs both evolved lineages of huge terrestrial herbivores. Although significantly more saurischian dinosaurs were giants than eutherians, the long bones of both taxa scale similarly and suggest that locomotion was dynamically similar. However, articular cartila...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bonnan, Matthew F., Wilhite, D. Ray, Masters, Simon L., Yates, Adam M., Gardner, Christine K., Aguiar, Adam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3793987/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24130690
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075216
_version_ 1782287157788934144
author Bonnan, Matthew F.
Wilhite, D. Ray
Masters, Simon L.
Yates, Adam M.
Gardner, Christine K.
Aguiar, Adam
author_facet Bonnan, Matthew F.
Wilhite, D. Ray
Masters, Simon L.
Yates, Adam M.
Gardner, Christine K.
Aguiar, Adam
author_sort Bonnan, Matthew F.
collection PubMed
description Eutherian mammals and saurischian dinosaurs both evolved lineages of huge terrestrial herbivores. Although significantly more saurischian dinosaurs were giants than eutherians, the long bones of both taxa scale similarly and suggest that locomotion was dynamically similar. However, articular cartilage is thin in eutherian mammals but thick in saurischian dinosaurs, differences that could have contributed to, or limited, how frequently gigantism evolved. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that sub-articular bone, which supports the articular cartilage, changes shape in different ways between terrestrial mammals and dinosaurs with increasing size. Our sample consisted of giant mammal and reptile taxa (i.e., elephants, rhinos, sauropods) plus erect and non-erect outgroups with thin and thick articular cartilage. Our results show that eutherian mammal sub-articular shape becomes narrow with well-defined surface features as size increases. In contrast, this region in saurischian dinosaurs expands and remains gently convex with increasing size. Similar trends were observed in non-erect outgroup taxa (monotremes, alligators), showing that the trends we report are posture-independent. These differences support our hypothesis that sub-articular shape scales differently between eutherian mammals and saurischian dinosaurs. Our results show that articular cartilage thickness and sub-articular shape are correlated. In mammals, joints become ever more congruent and thinner with increasing size, whereas archosaur joints remained both congruent and thick, especially in sauropods. We suggest that gigantism occurs less frequently in mammals, in part, because joints composed of thin articular cartilage can only become so congruent before stress cannot be effectively alleviated. In contrast, frequent gigantism in saurischian dinosaurs may be explained, in part, by joints with thick articular cartilage that can deform across large areas with increasing load.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3793987
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37939872013-10-15 What Lies Beneath: Sub-Articular Long Bone Shape Scaling in Eutherian Mammals and Saurischian Dinosaurs Suggests Different Locomotor Adaptations for Gigantism Bonnan, Matthew F. Wilhite, D. Ray Masters, Simon L. Yates, Adam M. Gardner, Christine K. Aguiar, Adam PLoS One Research Article Eutherian mammals and saurischian dinosaurs both evolved lineages of huge terrestrial herbivores. Although significantly more saurischian dinosaurs were giants than eutherians, the long bones of both taxa scale similarly and suggest that locomotion was dynamically similar. However, articular cartilage is thin in eutherian mammals but thick in saurischian dinosaurs, differences that could have contributed to, or limited, how frequently gigantism evolved. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that sub-articular bone, which supports the articular cartilage, changes shape in different ways between terrestrial mammals and dinosaurs with increasing size. Our sample consisted of giant mammal and reptile taxa (i.e., elephants, rhinos, sauropods) plus erect and non-erect outgroups with thin and thick articular cartilage. Our results show that eutherian mammal sub-articular shape becomes narrow with well-defined surface features as size increases. In contrast, this region in saurischian dinosaurs expands and remains gently convex with increasing size. Similar trends were observed in non-erect outgroup taxa (monotremes, alligators), showing that the trends we report are posture-independent. These differences support our hypothesis that sub-articular shape scales differently between eutherian mammals and saurischian dinosaurs. Our results show that articular cartilage thickness and sub-articular shape are correlated. In mammals, joints become ever more congruent and thinner with increasing size, whereas archosaur joints remained both congruent and thick, especially in sauropods. We suggest that gigantism occurs less frequently in mammals, in part, because joints composed of thin articular cartilage can only become so congruent before stress cannot be effectively alleviated. In contrast, frequent gigantism in saurischian dinosaurs may be explained, in part, by joints with thick articular cartilage that can deform across large areas with increasing load. Public Library of Science 2013-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3793987/ /pubmed/24130690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075216 Text en © 2013 Bonnan et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bonnan, Matthew F.
Wilhite, D. Ray
Masters, Simon L.
Yates, Adam M.
Gardner, Christine K.
Aguiar, Adam
What Lies Beneath: Sub-Articular Long Bone Shape Scaling in Eutherian Mammals and Saurischian Dinosaurs Suggests Different Locomotor Adaptations for Gigantism
title What Lies Beneath: Sub-Articular Long Bone Shape Scaling in Eutherian Mammals and Saurischian Dinosaurs Suggests Different Locomotor Adaptations for Gigantism
title_full What Lies Beneath: Sub-Articular Long Bone Shape Scaling in Eutherian Mammals and Saurischian Dinosaurs Suggests Different Locomotor Adaptations for Gigantism
title_fullStr What Lies Beneath: Sub-Articular Long Bone Shape Scaling in Eutherian Mammals and Saurischian Dinosaurs Suggests Different Locomotor Adaptations for Gigantism
title_full_unstemmed What Lies Beneath: Sub-Articular Long Bone Shape Scaling in Eutherian Mammals and Saurischian Dinosaurs Suggests Different Locomotor Adaptations for Gigantism
title_short What Lies Beneath: Sub-Articular Long Bone Shape Scaling in Eutherian Mammals and Saurischian Dinosaurs Suggests Different Locomotor Adaptations for Gigantism
title_sort what lies beneath: sub-articular long bone shape scaling in eutherian mammals and saurischian dinosaurs suggests different locomotor adaptations for gigantism
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3793987/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24130690
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075216
work_keys_str_mv AT bonnanmatthewf whatliesbeneathsubarticularlongboneshapescalingineutherianmammalsandsaurischiandinosaurssuggestsdifferentlocomotoradaptationsforgigantism
AT wilhitedray whatliesbeneathsubarticularlongboneshapescalingineutherianmammalsandsaurischiandinosaurssuggestsdifferentlocomotoradaptationsforgigantism
AT masterssimonl whatliesbeneathsubarticularlongboneshapescalingineutherianmammalsandsaurischiandinosaurssuggestsdifferentlocomotoradaptationsforgigantism
AT yatesadamm whatliesbeneathsubarticularlongboneshapescalingineutherianmammalsandsaurischiandinosaurssuggestsdifferentlocomotoradaptationsforgigantism
AT gardnerchristinek whatliesbeneathsubarticularlongboneshapescalingineutherianmammalsandsaurischiandinosaurssuggestsdifferentlocomotoradaptationsforgigantism
AT aguiaradam whatliesbeneathsubarticularlongboneshapescalingineutherianmammalsandsaurischiandinosaurssuggestsdifferentlocomotoradaptationsforgigantism