Cargando…

A Comparison of Morphological and Molecular-Based Surveys to Estimate the Species Richness of Chaetoceros and Thalassiosira (Bacillariophyta), in the Bay of Fundy

The goal of this study was to compare the ability of morphology and molecular-based surveys to estimate species richness for two species-rich diatom genera, Chaetoceros Ehrenb. and Thalassiosira Cleve, in the Bay of Fundy. Phytoplankton tows were collected from two sites at intervals over two years...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hamsher, Sarah E., LeGresley, Murielle M., Martin, Jennifer L., Saunders, Gary W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3794052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24130665
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073521
_version_ 1782287173430542336
author Hamsher, Sarah E.
LeGresley, Murielle M.
Martin, Jennifer L.
Saunders, Gary W.
author_facet Hamsher, Sarah E.
LeGresley, Murielle M.
Martin, Jennifer L.
Saunders, Gary W.
author_sort Hamsher, Sarah E.
collection PubMed
description The goal of this study was to compare the ability of morphology and molecular-based surveys to estimate species richness for two species-rich diatom genera, Chaetoceros Ehrenb. and Thalassiosira Cleve, in the Bay of Fundy. Phytoplankton tows were collected from two sites at intervals over two years and subsampled for morphology-based surveys (2010, 2011), a culture-based DNA reference library (DRL; 2010), and a molecular-based survey (2011). The DRL and molecular-based survey utilized the 3′ end of the RUBISCO large subunit (rbcL-3P) to identify genetic species groups (based on 0.1% divergence in rbcL-3P), which were subsequently identified morphologically to allow comparisons to the morphology-based survey. Comparisons were compiled for the year (2011) by site (n = 2) and by season (n = 3). Of the 34 taxa included in the comparisons, 50% of taxa were common to both methods, 35% were unique to the molecular-based survey, and 12% were unique to the morphology-based survey, while the remaining 3% of taxa were unidentified genetic species groups. The morphology-based survey excelled at identifying rare taxa in individual tow subsamples, which were occasionally missed with the molecular approach used here, while the molecular methods (the DRL and molecular-based survey), uncovered nine cryptic species pairs and four previously overlooked species. The last mentioned were typically difficult to identify and were generically assigned to Thalassiosira spp. during the morphology-based survey. Therefore, for now we suggest a combined approach encompassing routine morphology-based surveys accompanied by periodic molecular-based surveys to monitor for cryptic and difficult to identify taxa. As sequencing technologies improve, molecular-based surveys should become routine, leading to a more accurate representation of species composition and richness in monitoring programs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3794052
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37940522013-10-15 A Comparison of Morphological and Molecular-Based Surveys to Estimate the Species Richness of Chaetoceros and Thalassiosira (Bacillariophyta), in the Bay of Fundy Hamsher, Sarah E. LeGresley, Murielle M. Martin, Jennifer L. Saunders, Gary W. PLoS One Research Article The goal of this study was to compare the ability of morphology and molecular-based surveys to estimate species richness for two species-rich diatom genera, Chaetoceros Ehrenb. and Thalassiosira Cleve, in the Bay of Fundy. Phytoplankton tows were collected from two sites at intervals over two years and subsampled for morphology-based surveys (2010, 2011), a culture-based DNA reference library (DRL; 2010), and a molecular-based survey (2011). The DRL and molecular-based survey utilized the 3′ end of the RUBISCO large subunit (rbcL-3P) to identify genetic species groups (based on 0.1% divergence in rbcL-3P), which were subsequently identified morphologically to allow comparisons to the morphology-based survey. Comparisons were compiled for the year (2011) by site (n = 2) and by season (n = 3). Of the 34 taxa included in the comparisons, 50% of taxa were common to both methods, 35% were unique to the molecular-based survey, and 12% were unique to the morphology-based survey, while the remaining 3% of taxa were unidentified genetic species groups. The morphology-based survey excelled at identifying rare taxa in individual tow subsamples, which were occasionally missed with the molecular approach used here, while the molecular methods (the DRL and molecular-based survey), uncovered nine cryptic species pairs and four previously overlooked species. The last mentioned were typically difficult to identify and were generically assigned to Thalassiosira spp. during the morphology-based survey. Therefore, for now we suggest a combined approach encompassing routine morphology-based surveys accompanied by periodic molecular-based surveys to monitor for cryptic and difficult to identify taxa. As sequencing technologies improve, molecular-based surveys should become routine, leading to a more accurate representation of species composition and richness in monitoring programs. Public Library of Science 2013-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3794052/ /pubmed/24130665 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073521 Text en © 2013 Hamsher et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hamsher, Sarah E.
LeGresley, Murielle M.
Martin, Jennifer L.
Saunders, Gary W.
A Comparison of Morphological and Molecular-Based Surveys to Estimate the Species Richness of Chaetoceros and Thalassiosira (Bacillariophyta), in the Bay of Fundy
title A Comparison of Morphological and Molecular-Based Surveys to Estimate the Species Richness of Chaetoceros and Thalassiosira (Bacillariophyta), in the Bay of Fundy
title_full A Comparison of Morphological and Molecular-Based Surveys to Estimate the Species Richness of Chaetoceros and Thalassiosira (Bacillariophyta), in the Bay of Fundy
title_fullStr A Comparison of Morphological and Molecular-Based Surveys to Estimate the Species Richness of Chaetoceros and Thalassiosira (Bacillariophyta), in the Bay of Fundy
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Morphological and Molecular-Based Surveys to Estimate the Species Richness of Chaetoceros and Thalassiosira (Bacillariophyta), in the Bay of Fundy
title_short A Comparison of Morphological and Molecular-Based Surveys to Estimate the Species Richness of Chaetoceros and Thalassiosira (Bacillariophyta), in the Bay of Fundy
title_sort comparison of morphological and molecular-based surveys to estimate the species richness of chaetoceros and thalassiosira (bacillariophyta), in the bay of fundy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3794052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24130665
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073521
work_keys_str_mv AT hamshersarahe acomparisonofmorphologicalandmolecularbasedsurveystoestimatethespeciesrichnessofchaetocerosandthalassiosirabacillariophytainthebayoffundy
AT legresleymuriellem acomparisonofmorphologicalandmolecularbasedsurveystoestimatethespeciesrichnessofchaetocerosandthalassiosirabacillariophytainthebayoffundy
AT martinjenniferl acomparisonofmorphologicalandmolecularbasedsurveystoestimatethespeciesrichnessofchaetocerosandthalassiosirabacillariophytainthebayoffundy
AT saundersgaryw acomparisonofmorphologicalandmolecularbasedsurveystoestimatethespeciesrichnessofchaetocerosandthalassiosirabacillariophytainthebayoffundy
AT hamshersarahe comparisonofmorphologicalandmolecularbasedsurveystoestimatethespeciesrichnessofchaetocerosandthalassiosirabacillariophytainthebayoffundy
AT legresleymuriellem comparisonofmorphologicalandmolecularbasedsurveystoestimatethespeciesrichnessofchaetocerosandthalassiosirabacillariophytainthebayoffundy
AT martinjenniferl comparisonofmorphologicalandmolecularbasedsurveystoestimatethespeciesrichnessofchaetocerosandthalassiosirabacillariophytainthebayoffundy
AT saundersgaryw comparisonofmorphologicalandmolecularbasedsurveystoestimatethespeciesrichnessofchaetocerosandthalassiosirabacillariophytainthebayoffundy