Cargando…

Further evidence for the interaction of central and peripheral processes: the impact of double letters in writing English words

Most studies on spelling processes suppose that the activation of orthographic representations is over before we start to write. The goal of the present study was to provide evidence indicating that the orthographic representations activated during spelling production interact continuously with the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kandel, Sonia, Peereman, Ronald, Ghimenton, Anna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3794189/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24133473
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00729
_version_ 1782287183879602176
author Kandel, Sonia
Peereman, Ronald
Ghimenton, Anna
author_facet Kandel, Sonia
Peereman, Ronald
Ghimenton, Anna
author_sort Kandel, Sonia
collection PubMed
description Most studies on spelling processes suppose that the activation of orthographic representations is over before we start to write. The goal of the present study was to provide evidence indicating that the orthographic representations activated during spelling production interact continuously with the motor processes during movement production. We manipulated gemination to assess the influence of the orthographic properties of words on the kinematic parameters of production. Native English-speaking participants wrote words containing double letters and control words on a digitizer [e.g., DISSIPATE (Geminate) and DISGRACE (Control)]. The word pairs shared the initial letters and differed on the presence of a doublet at the same position. The results revealed that latencies were shorter for Geminates than Controls, indicating that spelling processes were facilitated by the presence of a doublet in the word. Critically, the impact of letter doubling was also observed during production, with shorter letter durations (e.g., D, I, S) and intervals (DI, IS) for Geminates than Controls. Letter doubling therefore affected the whole process of word writing: from spelling recall to movement preparation and production. The spelling processes that were involved before movement initiation cascaded into processes that regulate movement execution. The activation spread onto peripheral processing until the production of the doublet was completely programmed (e.g., letter S).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3794189
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37941892013-10-16 Further evidence for the interaction of central and peripheral processes: the impact of double letters in writing English words Kandel, Sonia Peereman, Ronald Ghimenton, Anna Front Psychol Psychology Most studies on spelling processes suppose that the activation of orthographic representations is over before we start to write. The goal of the present study was to provide evidence indicating that the orthographic representations activated during spelling production interact continuously with the motor processes during movement production. We manipulated gemination to assess the influence of the orthographic properties of words on the kinematic parameters of production. Native English-speaking participants wrote words containing double letters and control words on a digitizer [e.g., DISSIPATE (Geminate) and DISGRACE (Control)]. The word pairs shared the initial letters and differed on the presence of a doublet at the same position. The results revealed that latencies were shorter for Geminates than Controls, indicating that spelling processes were facilitated by the presence of a doublet in the word. Critically, the impact of letter doubling was also observed during production, with shorter letter durations (e.g., D, I, S) and intervals (DI, IS) for Geminates than Controls. Letter doubling therefore affected the whole process of word writing: from spelling recall to movement preparation and production. The spelling processes that were involved before movement initiation cascaded into processes that regulate movement execution. The activation spread onto peripheral processing until the production of the doublet was completely programmed (e.g., letter S). Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3794189/ /pubmed/24133473 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00729 Text en Copyright © 2013 Kandel, Peereman and Ghimenton. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Kandel, Sonia
Peereman, Ronald
Ghimenton, Anna
Further evidence for the interaction of central and peripheral processes: the impact of double letters in writing English words
title Further evidence for the interaction of central and peripheral processes: the impact of double letters in writing English words
title_full Further evidence for the interaction of central and peripheral processes: the impact of double letters in writing English words
title_fullStr Further evidence for the interaction of central and peripheral processes: the impact of double letters in writing English words
title_full_unstemmed Further evidence for the interaction of central and peripheral processes: the impact of double letters in writing English words
title_short Further evidence for the interaction of central and peripheral processes: the impact of double letters in writing English words
title_sort further evidence for the interaction of central and peripheral processes: the impact of double letters in writing english words
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3794189/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24133473
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00729
work_keys_str_mv AT kandelsonia furtherevidencefortheinteractionofcentralandperipheralprocessestheimpactofdoublelettersinwritingenglishwords
AT peeremanronald furtherevidencefortheinteractionofcentralandperipheralprocessestheimpactofdoublelettersinwritingenglishwords
AT ghimentonanna furtherevidencefortheinteractionofcentralandperipheralprocessestheimpactofdoublelettersinwritingenglishwords