Cargando…
The Iowa Gambling Task in depression – what have we learned about sub-optimal decision-making strategies?
Our earlier study found patients with depression to show a preference for larger reward as measured by the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT). In this IGT version, larger rewards were associated with even larger consequent losses. In the light of the clinical markers defining depressive disorder, this finding...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3794198/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24133474 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00732 |
_version_ | 1782287185637015552 |
---|---|
author | Must, Anita Horvath, Szatmar Nemeth, Viola L. Janka, Zoltan |
author_facet | Must, Anita Horvath, Szatmar Nemeth, Viola L. Janka, Zoltan |
author_sort | Must, Anita |
collection | PubMed |
description | Our earlier study found patients with depression to show a preference for larger reward as measured by the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT). In this IGT version, larger rewards were associated with even larger consequent losses. In the light of the clinical markers defining depressive disorder, this finding might appear controversial at first. Performance of depressed patients on various decision-making (DM) tasks is typically found to be impaired. Evidence points toward reduced reward learning, as well as the difficulty to shift strategy and integrate environmental changes into DM contingencies. This results in an impaired ability to modulate behavior as a function of reward, or punishment, respectively. Clinical symptoms of the disorder, the genetic profile, as well as personality traits might also influence DM strategies. More severe depression increased sensitivity to immediate large punishment, thus predicting future decisions, and was also associated with higher harm avoidance. Anhedonic features diminished reward learning abilities to a greater extent, even predicting clinical outcome. Several questions about how these aspects relate remain to be clarified. Is there a genetic predisposition for the DM impairment preceding mood symptoms? Is it the consequence of clinical signs or even learned behavior serving as a coping strategy? Are patients prone to develop an aversion of loss or are they unable to sense or deal with reward or the preference of reward? Does the DM deficit normalize or is a persisting impairment predictor for clinical outcome or relapse risk? To what extent is it influenced by medication effects? How does a long-lasting DM deficit affect daily life and social interactions? Strikingly, research evidence indicates that depressed patients tend to behave less deceptive and more self-focused, resulting in impaired social DM. The difficulty in daily interpersonal interactions might contribute to social isolation, further intensifying depressive symptoms. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3794198 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37941982013-10-16 The Iowa Gambling Task in depression – what have we learned about sub-optimal decision-making strategies? Must, Anita Horvath, Szatmar Nemeth, Viola L. Janka, Zoltan Front Psychol Neuroscience Our earlier study found patients with depression to show a preference for larger reward as measured by the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT). In this IGT version, larger rewards were associated with even larger consequent losses. In the light of the clinical markers defining depressive disorder, this finding might appear controversial at first. Performance of depressed patients on various decision-making (DM) tasks is typically found to be impaired. Evidence points toward reduced reward learning, as well as the difficulty to shift strategy and integrate environmental changes into DM contingencies. This results in an impaired ability to modulate behavior as a function of reward, or punishment, respectively. Clinical symptoms of the disorder, the genetic profile, as well as personality traits might also influence DM strategies. More severe depression increased sensitivity to immediate large punishment, thus predicting future decisions, and was also associated with higher harm avoidance. Anhedonic features diminished reward learning abilities to a greater extent, even predicting clinical outcome. Several questions about how these aspects relate remain to be clarified. Is there a genetic predisposition for the DM impairment preceding mood symptoms? Is it the consequence of clinical signs or even learned behavior serving as a coping strategy? Are patients prone to develop an aversion of loss or are they unable to sense or deal with reward or the preference of reward? Does the DM deficit normalize or is a persisting impairment predictor for clinical outcome or relapse risk? To what extent is it influenced by medication effects? How does a long-lasting DM deficit affect daily life and social interactions? Strikingly, research evidence indicates that depressed patients tend to behave less deceptive and more self-focused, resulting in impaired social DM. The difficulty in daily interpersonal interactions might contribute to social isolation, further intensifying depressive symptoms. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3794198/ /pubmed/24133474 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00732 Text en Copyright © 2013 Must, Horvath, Nemeth and Janka. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Must, Anita Horvath, Szatmar Nemeth, Viola L. Janka, Zoltan The Iowa Gambling Task in depression – what have we learned about sub-optimal decision-making strategies? |
title | The Iowa Gambling Task in depression – what have we learned about sub-optimal decision-making strategies? |
title_full | The Iowa Gambling Task in depression – what have we learned about sub-optimal decision-making strategies? |
title_fullStr | The Iowa Gambling Task in depression – what have we learned about sub-optimal decision-making strategies? |
title_full_unstemmed | The Iowa Gambling Task in depression – what have we learned about sub-optimal decision-making strategies? |
title_short | The Iowa Gambling Task in depression – what have we learned about sub-optimal decision-making strategies? |
title_sort | iowa gambling task in depression – what have we learned about sub-optimal decision-making strategies? |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3794198/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24133474 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00732 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mustanita theiowagamblingtaskindepressionwhathavewelearnedaboutsuboptimaldecisionmakingstrategies AT horvathszatmar theiowagamblingtaskindepressionwhathavewelearnedaboutsuboptimaldecisionmakingstrategies AT nemethviolal theiowagamblingtaskindepressionwhathavewelearnedaboutsuboptimaldecisionmakingstrategies AT jankazoltan theiowagamblingtaskindepressionwhathavewelearnedaboutsuboptimaldecisionmakingstrategies AT mustanita iowagamblingtaskindepressionwhathavewelearnedaboutsuboptimaldecisionmakingstrategies AT horvathszatmar iowagamblingtaskindepressionwhathavewelearnedaboutsuboptimaldecisionmakingstrategies AT nemethviolal iowagamblingtaskindepressionwhathavewelearnedaboutsuboptimaldecisionmakingstrategies AT jankazoltan iowagamblingtaskindepressionwhathavewelearnedaboutsuboptimaldecisionmakingstrategies |