Cargando…

The Iowa Gambling Task in depression – what have we learned about sub-optimal decision-making strategies?

Our earlier study found patients with depression to show a preference for larger reward as measured by the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT). In this IGT version, larger rewards were associated with even larger consequent losses. In the light of the clinical markers defining depressive disorder, this finding...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Must, Anita, Horvath, Szatmar, Nemeth, Viola L., Janka, Zoltan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3794198/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24133474
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00732
_version_ 1782287185637015552
author Must, Anita
Horvath, Szatmar
Nemeth, Viola L.
Janka, Zoltan
author_facet Must, Anita
Horvath, Szatmar
Nemeth, Viola L.
Janka, Zoltan
author_sort Must, Anita
collection PubMed
description Our earlier study found patients with depression to show a preference for larger reward as measured by the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT). In this IGT version, larger rewards were associated with even larger consequent losses. In the light of the clinical markers defining depressive disorder, this finding might appear controversial at first. Performance of depressed patients on various decision-making (DM) tasks is typically found to be impaired. Evidence points toward reduced reward learning, as well as the difficulty to shift strategy and integrate environmental changes into DM contingencies. This results in an impaired ability to modulate behavior as a function of reward, or punishment, respectively. Clinical symptoms of the disorder, the genetic profile, as well as personality traits might also influence DM strategies. More severe depression increased sensitivity to immediate large punishment, thus predicting future decisions, and was also associated with higher harm avoidance. Anhedonic features diminished reward learning abilities to a greater extent, even predicting clinical outcome. Several questions about how these aspects relate remain to be clarified. Is there a genetic predisposition for the DM impairment preceding mood symptoms? Is it the consequence of clinical signs or even learned behavior serving as a coping strategy? Are patients prone to develop an aversion of loss or are they unable to sense or deal with reward or the preference of reward? Does the DM deficit normalize or is a persisting impairment predictor for clinical outcome or relapse risk? To what extent is it influenced by medication effects? How does a long-lasting DM deficit affect daily life and social interactions? Strikingly, research evidence indicates that depressed patients tend to behave less deceptive and more self-focused, resulting in impaired social DM. The difficulty in daily interpersonal interactions might contribute to social isolation, further intensifying depressive symptoms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3794198
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37941982013-10-16 The Iowa Gambling Task in depression – what have we learned about sub-optimal decision-making strategies? Must, Anita Horvath, Szatmar Nemeth, Viola L. Janka, Zoltan Front Psychol Neuroscience Our earlier study found patients with depression to show a preference for larger reward as measured by the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT). In this IGT version, larger rewards were associated with even larger consequent losses. In the light of the clinical markers defining depressive disorder, this finding might appear controversial at first. Performance of depressed patients on various decision-making (DM) tasks is typically found to be impaired. Evidence points toward reduced reward learning, as well as the difficulty to shift strategy and integrate environmental changes into DM contingencies. This results in an impaired ability to modulate behavior as a function of reward, or punishment, respectively. Clinical symptoms of the disorder, the genetic profile, as well as personality traits might also influence DM strategies. More severe depression increased sensitivity to immediate large punishment, thus predicting future decisions, and was also associated with higher harm avoidance. Anhedonic features diminished reward learning abilities to a greater extent, even predicting clinical outcome. Several questions about how these aspects relate remain to be clarified. Is there a genetic predisposition for the DM impairment preceding mood symptoms? Is it the consequence of clinical signs or even learned behavior serving as a coping strategy? Are patients prone to develop an aversion of loss or are they unable to sense or deal with reward or the preference of reward? Does the DM deficit normalize or is a persisting impairment predictor for clinical outcome or relapse risk? To what extent is it influenced by medication effects? How does a long-lasting DM deficit affect daily life and social interactions? Strikingly, research evidence indicates that depressed patients tend to behave less deceptive and more self-focused, resulting in impaired social DM. The difficulty in daily interpersonal interactions might contribute to social isolation, further intensifying depressive symptoms. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3794198/ /pubmed/24133474 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00732 Text en Copyright © 2013 Must, Horvath, Nemeth and Janka. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Must, Anita
Horvath, Szatmar
Nemeth, Viola L.
Janka, Zoltan
The Iowa Gambling Task in depression – what have we learned about sub-optimal decision-making strategies?
title The Iowa Gambling Task in depression – what have we learned about sub-optimal decision-making strategies?
title_full The Iowa Gambling Task in depression – what have we learned about sub-optimal decision-making strategies?
title_fullStr The Iowa Gambling Task in depression – what have we learned about sub-optimal decision-making strategies?
title_full_unstemmed The Iowa Gambling Task in depression – what have we learned about sub-optimal decision-making strategies?
title_short The Iowa Gambling Task in depression – what have we learned about sub-optimal decision-making strategies?
title_sort iowa gambling task in depression – what have we learned about sub-optimal decision-making strategies?
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3794198/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24133474
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00732
work_keys_str_mv AT mustanita theiowagamblingtaskindepressionwhathavewelearnedaboutsuboptimaldecisionmakingstrategies
AT horvathszatmar theiowagamblingtaskindepressionwhathavewelearnedaboutsuboptimaldecisionmakingstrategies
AT nemethviolal theiowagamblingtaskindepressionwhathavewelearnedaboutsuboptimaldecisionmakingstrategies
AT jankazoltan theiowagamblingtaskindepressionwhathavewelearnedaboutsuboptimaldecisionmakingstrategies
AT mustanita iowagamblingtaskindepressionwhathavewelearnedaboutsuboptimaldecisionmakingstrategies
AT horvathszatmar iowagamblingtaskindepressionwhathavewelearnedaboutsuboptimaldecisionmakingstrategies
AT nemethviolal iowagamblingtaskindepressionwhathavewelearnedaboutsuboptimaldecisionmakingstrategies
AT jankazoltan iowagamblingtaskindepressionwhathavewelearnedaboutsuboptimaldecisionmakingstrategies