Cargando…

Visual performance after the implantation of a new trifocal intraocular lens

PURPOSE: To evaluate the subjective and objective visual results after the implantation of a new trifocal diffractive intraocular lens. METHODS: A new trifocal diffractive intraocular lens was designed combining two superimposed diffractive profiles: one with +1.75 diopters (D) addition for intermed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vryghem, Jérôme C, Heireman, Steven
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3794849/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24124348
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S44415
_version_ 1782287274821550080
author Vryghem, Jérôme C
Heireman, Steven
author_facet Vryghem, Jérôme C
Heireman, Steven
author_sort Vryghem, Jérôme C
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the subjective and objective visual results after the implantation of a new trifocal diffractive intraocular lens. METHODS: A new trifocal diffractive intraocular lens was designed combining two superimposed diffractive profiles: one with +1.75 diopters (D) addition for intermediate vision and the other with +3.50 D addition for near vision. Fifty eyes of 25 patients that were operated on by one surgeon are included in this study. The uncorrected and best distance-corrected monocular and binocular, near, intermediate, and distance visual acuities, contrast sensitivity, and defocus curves were measured 6 months postoperatively. In addition to the standard clinical follow-up, a questionnaire evaluating individual satisfaction and quality of life was submitted to the patients. RESULTS: The mean age of patients at the time of surgery was 70 ± 10 years. The mean uncorrected and corrected monocular distance visual acuity (VA) were LogMAR 0.06 ± 0.10 and LogMAR 0.00 ± 0.08, respectively. The outcomes for the binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity were almost the same (LogMAR −0.04 ± 0.09). LogMAR −010 ± 0.15 and 0.02 ± 0.06 were measured for the binocular uncorrected intermediate and near VA, respectively. The distance-corrected visual acuity was maintained in mesopic conditions. The contrast sensitivity was similar to that obtained after implantation of a bifocal intraocular lens and did not decrease in mesopic conditions. The binocular defocus curve confirms good VA even in the intermediate distance range, with a moderate decrease of less than LogMAR 0.2 at −1.5 D, with respect to the best distance VA at 0 D defocus. Patient satisfaction was high. No discrepancy between the objective and subjective outcomes was evidenced. CONCLUSION: The introduction of a third focus in diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses improves the intermediate vision with minimal visual discomfort for the patient.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3794849
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37948492013-10-11 Visual performance after the implantation of a new trifocal intraocular lens Vryghem, Jérôme C Heireman, Steven Clin Ophthalmol Case Series PURPOSE: To evaluate the subjective and objective visual results after the implantation of a new trifocal diffractive intraocular lens. METHODS: A new trifocal diffractive intraocular lens was designed combining two superimposed diffractive profiles: one with +1.75 diopters (D) addition for intermediate vision and the other with +3.50 D addition for near vision. Fifty eyes of 25 patients that were operated on by one surgeon are included in this study. The uncorrected and best distance-corrected monocular and binocular, near, intermediate, and distance visual acuities, contrast sensitivity, and defocus curves were measured 6 months postoperatively. In addition to the standard clinical follow-up, a questionnaire evaluating individual satisfaction and quality of life was submitted to the patients. RESULTS: The mean age of patients at the time of surgery was 70 ± 10 years. The mean uncorrected and corrected monocular distance visual acuity (VA) were LogMAR 0.06 ± 0.10 and LogMAR 0.00 ± 0.08, respectively. The outcomes for the binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity were almost the same (LogMAR −0.04 ± 0.09). LogMAR −010 ± 0.15 and 0.02 ± 0.06 were measured for the binocular uncorrected intermediate and near VA, respectively. The distance-corrected visual acuity was maintained in mesopic conditions. The contrast sensitivity was similar to that obtained after implantation of a bifocal intraocular lens and did not decrease in mesopic conditions. The binocular defocus curve confirms good VA even in the intermediate distance range, with a moderate decrease of less than LogMAR 0.2 at −1.5 D, with respect to the best distance VA at 0 D defocus. Patient satisfaction was high. No discrepancy between the objective and subjective outcomes was evidenced. CONCLUSION: The introduction of a third focus in diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses improves the intermediate vision with minimal visual discomfort for the patient. Dove Medical Press 2013 2013-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3794849/ /pubmed/24124348 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S44415 Text en © 2013 Vryghem and Heireman, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Case Series
Vryghem, Jérôme C
Heireman, Steven
Visual performance after the implantation of a new trifocal intraocular lens
title Visual performance after the implantation of a new trifocal intraocular lens
title_full Visual performance after the implantation of a new trifocal intraocular lens
title_fullStr Visual performance after the implantation of a new trifocal intraocular lens
title_full_unstemmed Visual performance after the implantation of a new trifocal intraocular lens
title_short Visual performance after the implantation of a new trifocal intraocular lens
title_sort visual performance after the implantation of a new trifocal intraocular lens
topic Case Series
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3794849/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24124348
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S44415
work_keys_str_mv AT vryghemjeromec visualperformanceaftertheimplantationofanewtrifocalintraocularlens
AT heiremansteven visualperformanceaftertheimplantationofanewtrifocalintraocularlens