Cargando…
Current status of percutaneous vertebroplasty and percutaneous kyphoplasty – a review
Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PV) and kyphoplasty (PK) are the 2 vertebral augmentation procedures that have emerged as minimally invasive surgical options to treat painful vertebral compression fractures (VCF) during the last 2 decades. VCF may either be osteoporotic or tumor-associated. Two hundred...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
International Scientific Literature, Inc.
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3795017/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24097261 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.889479 |
_version_ | 1782287317476573184 |
---|---|
author | Yimin, Yang Zhiwei, Ren Wei, Ma Jha, Rajiv |
author_facet | Yimin, Yang Zhiwei, Ren Wei, Ma Jha, Rajiv |
author_sort | Yimin, Yang |
collection | PubMed |
description | Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PV) and kyphoplasty (PK) are the 2 vertebral augmentation procedures that have emerged as minimally invasive surgical options to treat painful vertebral compression fractures (VCF) during the last 2 decades. VCF may either be osteoporotic or tumor-associated. Two hundred million women are affected by osteoporosis globally. Vertebral fracture may result in acute pain around the fracture site, loss of vertebral height due to vertebral collapse, spinal instability, and kyphotic deformity. The main goal of the PV and PK procedures is to give immediate pain relief to patients and restore the vertebral height lost due to fracture. In percutaneous vertebroplasty, bone cement is injected through a minimal incision into the fractured site. Kyphoplasty involves insertion of a balloon into the fractured site, followed by inflation-deflation to create a cavity into which the filler material is injected, and the balloon is taken out prior to cement injection. This literature review presents a qualitative overview on the current status of vertebral augmentation procedures, especially PV and PK, and compares the efficacy and safety of these 2 procedures. The review consists of a brief history of the development of these 2 techniques, a discussion on the current research on the bone cement, clinical outcome of the 2 procedures, and it also sheds light on ongoing and future research to maximize the efficacy and safety of vertebral augmentation procedures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3795017 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | International Scientific Literature, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37950172013-10-17 Current status of percutaneous vertebroplasty and percutaneous kyphoplasty – a review Yimin, Yang Zhiwei, Ren Wei, Ma Jha, Rajiv Med Sci Monit Review Articles Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PV) and kyphoplasty (PK) are the 2 vertebral augmentation procedures that have emerged as minimally invasive surgical options to treat painful vertebral compression fractures (VCF) during the last 2 decades. VCF may either be osteoporotic or tumor-associated. Two hundred million women are affected by osteoporosis globally. Vertebral fracture may result in acute pain around the fracture site, loss of vertebral height due to vertebral collapse, spinal instability, and kyphotic deformity. The main goal of the PV and PK procedures is to give immediate pain relief to patients and restore the vertebral height lost due to fracture. In percutaneous vertebroplasty, bone cement is injected through a minimal incision into the fractured site. Kyphoplasty involves insertion of a balloon into the fractured site, followed by inflation-deflation to create a cavity into which the filler material is injected, and the balloon is taken out prior to cement injection. This literature review presents a qualitative overview on the current status of vertebral augmentation procedures, especially PV and PK, and compares the efficacy and safety of these 2 procedures. The review consists of a brief history of the development of these 2 techniques, a discussion on the current research on the bone cement, clinical outcome of the 2 procedures, and it also sheds light on ongoing and future research to maximize the efficacy and safety of vertebral augmentation procedures. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2013-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3795017/ /pubmed/24097261 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.889479 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2013 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License |
spellingShingle | Review Articles Yimin, Yang Zhiwei, Ren Wei, Ma Jha, Rajiv Current status of percutaneous vertebroplasty and percutaneous kyphoplasty – a review |
title | Current status of percutaneous vertebroplasty and percutaneous kyphoplasty – a review |
title_full | Current status of percutaneous vertebroplasty and percutaneous kyphoplasty – a review |
title_fullStr | Current status of percutaneous vertebroplasty and percutaneous kyphoplasty – a review |
title_full_unstemmed | Current status of percutaneous vertebroplasty and percutaneous kyphoplasty – a review |
title_short | Current status of percutaneous vertebroplasty and percutaneous kyphoplasty – a review |
title_sort | current status of percutaneous vertebroplasty and percutaneous kyphoplasty – a review |
topic | Review Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3795017/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24097261 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.889479 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yiminyang currentstatusofpercutaneousvertebroplastyandpercutaneouskyphoplastyareview AT zhiweiren currentstatusofpercutaneousvertebroplastyandpercutaneouskyphoplastyareview AT weima currentstatusofpercutaneousvertebroplastyandpercutaneouskyphoplastyareview AT jharajiv currentstatusofpercutaneousvertebroplastyandpercutaneouskyphoplastyareview |