Cargando…

Current status of percutaneous vertebroplasty and percutaneous kyphoplasty – a review

Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PV) and kyphoplasty (PK) are the 2 vertebral augmentation procedures that have emerged as minimally invasive surgical options to treat painful vertebral compression fractures (VCF) during the last 2 decades. VCF may either be osteoporotic or tumor-associated. Two hundred...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yimin, Yang, Zhiwei, Ren, Wei, Ma, Jha, Rajiv
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3795017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24097261
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.889479
_version_ 1782287317476573184
author Yimin, Yang
Zhiwei, Ren
Wei, Ma
Jha, Rajiv
author_facet Yimin, Yang
Zhiwei, Ren
Wei, Ma
Jha, Rajiv
author_sort Yimin, Yang
collection PubMed
description Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PV) and kyphoplasty (PK) are the 2 vertebral augmentation procedures that have emerged as minimally invasive surgical options to treat painful vertebral compression fractures (VCF) during the last 2 decades. VCF may either be osteoporotic or tumor-associated. Two hundred million women are affected by osteoporosis globally. Vertebral fracture may result in acute pain around the fracture site, loss of vertebral height due to vertebral collapse, spinal instability, and kyphotic deformity. The main goal of the PV and PK procedures is to give immediate pain relief to patients and restore the vertebral height lost due to fracture. In percutaneous vertebroplasty, bone cement is injected through a minimal incision into the fractured site. Kyphoplasty involves insertion of a balloon into the fractured site, followed by inflation-deflation to create a cavity into which the filler material is injected, and the balloon is taken out prior to cement injection. This literature review presents a qualitative overview on the current status of vertebral augmentation procedures, especially PV and PK, and compares the efficacy and safety of these 2 procedures. The review consists of a brief history of the development of these 2 techniques, a discussion on the current research on the bone cement, clinical outcome of the 2 procedures, and it also sheds light on ongoing and future research to maximize the efficacy and safety of vertebral augmentation procedures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3795017
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher International Scientific Literature, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37950172013-10-17 Current status of percutaneous vertebroplasty and percutaneous kyphoplasty – a review Yimin, Yang Zhiwei, Ren Wei, Ma Jha, Rajiv Med Sci Monit Review Articles Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PV) and kyphoplasty (PK) are the 2 vertebral augmentation procedures that have emerged as minimally invasive surgical options to treat painful vertebral compression fractures (VCF) during the last 2 decades. VCF may either be osteoporotic or tumor-associated. Two hundred million women are affected by osteoporosis globally. Vertebral fracture may result in acute pain around the fracture site, loss of vertebral height due to vertebral collapse, spinal instability, and kyphotic deformity. The main goal of the PV and PK procedures is to give immediate pain relief to patients and restore the vertebral height lost due to fracture. In percutaneous vertebroplasty, bone cement is injected through a minimal incision into the fractured site. Kyphoplasty involves insertion of a balloon into the fractured site, followed by inflation-deflation to create a cavity into which the filler material is injected, and the balloon is taken out prior to cement injection. This literature review presents a qualitative overview on the current status of vertebral augmentation procedures, especially PV and PK, and compares the efficacy and safety of these 2 procedures. The review consists of a brief history of the development of these 2 techniques, a discussion on the current research on the bone cement, clinical outcome of the 2 procedures, and it also sheds light on ongoing and future research to maximize the efficacy and safety of vertebral augmentation procedures. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2013-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3795017/ /pubmed/24097261 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.889479 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2013 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License
spellingShingle Review Articles
Yimin, Yang
Zhiwei, Ren
Wei, Ma
Jha, Rajiv
Current status of percutaneous vertebroplasty and percutaneous kyphoplasty – a review
title Current status of percutaneous vertebroplasty and percutaneous kyphoplasty – a review
title_full Current status of percutaneous vertebroplasty and percutaneous kyphoplasty – a review
title_fullStr Current status of percutaneous vertebroplasty and percutaneous kyphoplasty – a review
title_full_unstemmed Current status of percutaneous vertebroplasty and percutaneous kyphoplasty – a review
title_short Current status of percutaneous vertebroplasty and percutaneous kyphoplasty – a review
title_sort current status of percutaneous vertebroplasty and percutaneous kyphoplasty – a review
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3795017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24097261
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.889479
work_keys_str_mv AT yiminyang currentstatusofpercutaneousvertebroplastyandpercutaneouskyphoplastyareview
AT zhiweiren currentstatusofpercutaneousvertebroplastyandpercutaneouskyphoplastyareview
AT weima currentstatusofpercutaneousvertebroplastyandpercutaneouskyphoplastyareview
AT jharajiv currentstatusofpercutaneousvertebroplastyandpercutaneouskyphoplastyareview