Cargando…

Implementation and evaluation of adverse drug reaction monitoring system in a tertiary care teaching hospital in Mumbai, India

Adverse drug reactions (ADR) are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, often identified only post-marketingly. Improvement in current ADR reporting, including utility of underused or innovative methods, is crucial to improve patient safety and public health. Hospital-based monitoring is on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patidar, Dindayal, Rajput, Mithun S., Nirmal, Nilesh P., Savitri, Wenny
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Slovak Toxicology Society SETOX 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3795320/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24170978
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/intox-2013-0008
_version_ 1782287361318584320
author Patidar, Dindayal
Rajput, Mithun S.
Nirmal, Nilesh P.
Savitri, Wenny
author_facet Patidar, Dindayal
Rajput, Mithun S.
Nirmal, Nilesh P.
Savitri, Wenny
author_sort Patidar, Dindayal
collection PubMed
description Adverse drug reactions (ADR) are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, often identified only post-marketingly. Improvement in current ADR reporting, including utility of underused or innovative methods, is crucial to improve patient safety and public health. Hospital-based monitoring is one of the methods used to collect data about drug prescriptions and adverse events. The aims of this study were to identify the most frequent ADRs recognized by the attending physicians, study their nature, and to target these ADRs in order to take future preventive measures. A prospective study was conducted over a 7-month period in an internal medicine department using stimulated spontaneous reporting for identifying ADRs. Out of the 254 admissions, 32 ADRs in 37 patients (14.56%) were validated from the total of 36 suspected ADRs in 41 patients. Female predominance was noted over males in case of ADRs. Fifty percent of total ADRs occurred due to multiple drug therapy. Dermatological ADRs were found to be the most frequent (68.75%), followed by respiratory, central nervous system and gastrointestinal ADRs. The drugs most frequently involved were antibiotics, anti-tubercular agents, antigout agents, and NSAIDs. The most commonly reported reactions were itching and rashes. Out of the 32 reported ADRs, 50% of the reactions were probable, 46.87% of the reactions were possible and 3.12% of the reactions were definite. The severity assessment done by using the Hartwig and Seigel scale indicated that the majority of ADRs were ‘Mild’ followed by ‘Moderate’ and ‘Severe’ reactions, respectively. Out of all, 75% of ADRs were recovered. The most potent management of ADRs was found to be drug withdrawal. Our study indicated that hospital based monitoring was a good method to detect links between drug exposure and adverse drug reactions. Adequate training regarding pharmacology and optimization of drug therapy might be helpful to reduce ADR morbidity and mortality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3795320
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Slovak Toxicology Society SETOX
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37953202013-10-29 Implementation and evaluation of adverse drug reaction monitoring system in a tertiary care teaching hospital in Mumbai, India Patidar, Dindayal Rajput, Mithun S. Nirmal, Nilesh P. Savitri, Wenny Interdiscip Toxicol Original Article Adverse drug reactions (ADR) are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, often identified only post-marketingly. Improvement in current ADR reporting, including utility of underused or innovative methods, is crucial to improve patient safety and public health. Hospital-based monitoring is one of the methods used to collect data about drug prescriptions and adverse events. The aims of this study were to identify the most frequent ADRs recognized by the attending physicians, study their nature, and to target these ADRs in order to take future preventive measures. A prospective study was conducted over a 7-month period in an internal medicine department using stimulated spontaneous reporting for identifying ADRs. Out of the 254 admissions, 32 ADRs in 37 patients (14.56%) were validated from the total of 36 suspected ADRs in 41 patients. Female predominance was noted over males in case of ADRs. Fifty percent of total ADRs occurred due to multiple drug therapy. Dermatological ADRs were found to be the most frequent (68.75%), followed by respiratory, central nervous system and gastrointestinal ADRs. The drugs most frequently involved were antibiotics, anti-tubercular agents, antigout agents, and NSAIDs. The most commonly reported reactions were itching and rashes. Out of the 32 reported ADRs, 50% of the reactions were probable, 46.87% of the reactions were possible and 3.12% of the reactions were definite. The severity assessment done by using the Hartwig and Seigel scale indicated that the majority of ADRs were ‘Mild’ followed by ‘Moderate’ and ‘Severe’ reactions, respectively. Out of all, 75% of ADRs were recovered. The most potent management of ADRs was found to be drug withdrawal. Our study indicated that hospital based monitoring was a good method to detect links between drug exposure and adverse drug reactions. Adequate training regarding pharmacology and optimization of drug therapy might be helpful to reduce ADR morbidity and mortality. Slovak Toxicology Society SETOX 2013-03 2013-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3795320/ /pubmed/24170978 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/intox-2013-0008 Text en Copyright © 2013 Slovak Toxicology Society SETOX http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Patidar, Dindayal
Rajput, Mithun S.
Nirmal, Nilesh P.
Savitri, Wenny
Implementation and evaluation of adverse drug reaction monitoring system in a tertiary care teaching hospital in Mumbai, India
title Implementation and evaluation of adverse drug reaction monitoring system in a tertiary care teaching hospital in Mumbai, India
title_full Implementation and evaluation of adverse drug reaction monitoring system in a tertiary care teaching hospital in Mumbai, India
title_fullStr Implementation and evaluation of adverse drug reaction monitoring system in a tertiary care teaching hospital in Mumbai, India
title_full_unstemmed Implementation and evaluation of adverse drug reaction monitoring system in a tertiary care teaching hospital in Mumbai, India
title_short Implementation and evaluation of adverse drug reaction monitoring system in a tertiary care teaching hospital in Mumbai, India
title_sort implementation and evaluation of adverse drug reaction monitoring system in a tertiary care teaching hospital in mumbai, india
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3795320/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24170978
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/intox-2013-0008
work_keys_str_mv AT patidardindayal implementationandevaluationofadversedrugreactionmonitoringsysteminatertiarycareteachinghospitalinmumbaiindia
AT rajputmithuns implementationandevaluationofadversedrugreactionmonitoringsysteminatertiarycareteachinghospitalinmumbaiindia
AT nirmalnileshp implementationandevaluationofadversedrugreactionmonitoringsysteminatertiarycareteachinghospitalinmumbaiindia
AT savitriwenny implementationandevaluationofadversedrugreactionmonitoringsysteminatertiarycareteachinghospitalinmumbaiindia