Cargando…
Acetabular Component Anteversion in Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Observational Study
PURPOSE: In a prospective manner to evaluate the range of acetabular component anteversion actually achieved by the use of a cup positioner in cementless revision and primary THA. METHODS: We operated 71 patients with cementless primary THA, and 26 patients with cementless acetabular revision surger...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Bentham Open
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3795404/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24133555 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874325001307010600 |
_version_ | 1782287375845556224 |
---|---|
author | Reikerås, Olav Gunderson, Ragnhild B. |
author_facet | Reikerås, Olav Gunderson, Ragnhild B. |
author_sort | Reikerås, Olav |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: In a prospective manner to evaluate the range of acetabular component anteversion actually achieved by the use of a cup positioner in cementless revision and primary THA. METHODS: We operated 71 patients with cementless primary THA, and 26 patients with cementless acetabular revision surgery. We aimed to obtain cup anteversion of 10 to 30° with an impactor-positioner. In all cases we used elevated liners and a ceramic head with diameter 28. At 3 months postoperatively the component versions were measured using CT with the patient in supine position. RESULTS: The acetabular component version in the primary hips ranged from 28° of retroversion to 42° of anteversion with a mean of 17.4 ± 14.0°, while the cup version in the revision hips ranged from 4° of retroversion to 32° of anteversion with a mean of 15.0 ± 9.6°(p=0.427). The anteversion of 40 (56%) of the primary acetabular components were within the target zone of 10 to 30°, while 19 (27%) were below the target zone and and 12 (17%) were above the target range. The anteversion of 19 (73%) of the revision acetabular components were within the target zone, while 6 (23%) were below the target zone and 1 (4%) were above the target range. The differences in distribution between the primary and revision operations were not significant (p=0.183). CONCLUSIONS: The intraoperative estimation of acetabular anteversion by free hand technique in many cases was not within the intended range of 10 to 30° in either primary or revision THA and with no differences between the two series |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3795404 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Bentham Open |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37954042013-10-16 Acetabular Component Anteversion in Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Observational Study Reikerås, Olav Gunderson, Ragnhild B. Open Orthop J Article PURPOSE: In a prospective manner to evaluate the range of acetabular component anteversion actually achieved by the use of a cup positioner in cementless revision and primary THA. METHODS: We operated 71 patients with cementless primary THA, and 26 patients with cementless acetabular revision surgery. We aimed to obtain cup anteversion of 10 to 30° with an impactor-positioner. In all cases we used elevated liners and a ceramic head with diameter 28. At 3 months postoperatively the component versions were measured using CT with the patient in supine position. RESULTS: The acetabular component version in the primary hips ranged from 28° of retroversion to 42° of anteversion with a mean of 17.4 ± 14.0°, while the cup version in the revision hips ranged from 4° of retroversion to 32° of anteversion with a mean of 15.0 ± 9.6°(p=0.427). The anteversion of 40 (56%) of the primary acetabular components were within the target zone of 10 to 30°, while 19 (27%) were below the target zone and and 12 (17%) were above the target range. The anteversion of 19 (73%) of the revision acetabular components were within the target zone, while 6 (23%) were below the target zone and 1 (4%) were above the target range. The differences in distribution between the primary and revision operations were not significant (p=0.183). CONCLUSIONS: The intraoperative estimation of acetabular anteversion by free hand technique in many cases was not within the intended range of 10 to 30° in either primary or revision THA and with no differences between the two series Bentham Open 2013-10-4 /pmc/articles/PMC3795404/ /pubmed/24133555 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874325001307010600 Text en © Reikerås and Gunderson; Licensee Bentham Open. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Article Reikerås, Olav Gunderson, Ragnhild B. Acetabular Component Anteversion in Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Observational Study |
title | Acetabular Component Anteversion in Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Observational Study |
title_full | Acetabular Component Anteversion in Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Observational Study |
title_fullStr | Acetabular Component Anteversion in Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Observational Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Acetabular Component Anteversion in Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Observational Study |
title_short | Acetabular Component Anteversion in Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Observational Study |
title_sort | acetabular component anteversion in primary and revision total hip arthroplasty: an observational study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3795404/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24133555 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874325001307010600 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reikerasolav acetabularcomponentanteversioninprimaryandrevisiontotalhiparthroplastyanobservationalstudy AT gundersonragnhildb acetabularcomponentanteversioninprimaryandrevisiontotalhiparthroplastyanobservationalstudy |