Cargando…

Acetabular Component Anteversion in Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Observational Study

PURPOSE: In a prospective manner to evaluate the range of acetabular component anteversion actually achieved by the use of a cup positioner in cementless revision and primary THA. METHODS: We operated 71 patients with cementless primary THA, and 26 patients with cementless acetabular revision surger...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reikerås, Olav, Gunderson, Ragnhild B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bentham Open 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3795404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24133555
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874325001307010600
_version_ 1782287375845556224
author Reikerås, Olav
Gunderson, Ragnhild B.
author_facet Reikerås, Olav
Gunderson, Ragnhild B.
author_sort Reikerås, Olav
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: In a prospective manner to evaluate the range of acetabular component anteversion actually achieved by the use of a cup positioner in cementless revision and primary THA. METHODS: We operated 71 patients with cementless primary THA, and 26 patients with cementless acetabular revision surgery. We aimed to obtain cup anteversion of 10 to 30° with an impactor-positioner. In all cases we used elevated liners and a ceramic head with diameter 28. At 3 months postoperatively the component versions were measured using CT with the patient in supine position. RESULTS: The acetabular component version in the primary hips ranged from 28° of retroversion to 42° of anteversion with a mean of 17.4 ± 14.0°, while the cup version in the revision hips ranged from 4° of retroversion to 32° of anteversion with a mean of 15.0 ± 9.6°(p=0.427). The anteversion of 40 (56%) of the primary acetabular components were within the target zone of 10 to 30°, while 19 (27%) were below the target zone and and 12 (17%) were above the target range. The anteversion of 19 (73%) of the revision acetabular components were within the target zone, while 6 (23%) were below the target zone and 1 (4%) were above the target range. The differences in distribution between the primary and revision operations were not significant (p=0.183). CONCLUSIONS: The intraoperative estimation of acetabular anteversion by free hand technique in many cases was not within the intended range of 10 to 30° in either primary or revision THA and with no differences between the two series
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3795404
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Bentham Open
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37954042013-10-16 Acetabular Component Anteversion in Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Observational Study Reikerås, Olav Gunderson, Ragnhild B. Open Orthop J Article PURPOSE: In a prospective manner to evaluate the range of acetabular component anteversion actually achieved by the use of a cup positioner in cementless revision and primary THA. METHODS: We operated 71 patients with cementless primary THA, and 26 patients with cementless acetabular revision surgery. We aimed to obtain cup anteversion of 10 to 30° with an impactor-positioner. In all cases we used elevated liners and a ceramic head with diameter 28. At 3 months postoperatively the component versions were measured using CT with the patient in supine position. RESULTS: The acetabular component version in the primary hips ranged from 28° of retroversion to 42° of anteversion with a mean of 17.4 ± 14.0°, while the cup version in the revision hips ranged from 4° of retroversion to 32° of anteversion with a mean of 15.0 ± 9.6°(p=0.427). The anteversion of 40 (56%) of the primary acetabular components were within the target zone of 10 to 30°, while 19 (27%) were below the target zone and and 12 (17%) were above the target range. The anteversion of 19 (73%) of the revision acetabular components were within the target zone, while 6 (23%) were below the target zone and 1 (4%) were above the target range. The differences in distribution between the primary and revision operations were not significant (p=0.183). CONCLUSIONS: The intraoperative estimation of acetabular anteversion by free hand technique in many cases was not within the intended range of 10 to 30° in either primary or revision THA and with no differences between the two series Bentham Open 2013-10-4 /pmc/articles/PMC3795404/ /pubmed/24133555 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874325001307010600 Text en © Reikerås and Gunderson; Licensee Bentham Open. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Reikerås, Olav
Gunderson, Ragnhild B.
Acetabular Component Anteversion in Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Observational Study
title Acetabular Component Anteversion in Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Observational Study
title_full Acetabular Component Anteversion in Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Observational Study
title_fullStr Acetabular Component Anteversion in Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Observational Study
title_full_unstemmed Acetabular Component Anteversion in Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Observational Study
title_short Acetabular Component Anteversion in Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Observational Study
title_sort acetabular component anteversion in primary and revision total hip arthroplasty: an observational study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3795404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24133555
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874325001307010600
work_keys_str_mv AT reikerasolav acetabularcomponentanteversioninprimaryandrevisiontotalhiparthroplastyanobservationalstudy
AT gundersonragnhildb acetabularcomponentanteversioninprimaryandrevisiontotalhiparthroplastyanobservationalstudy