Cargando…

Training, hypnosis, and drugs: artificial synaesthesia, or artificial paradises?

The last few years have seen the publication of a number of studies by researchers claiming to have induced “synaesthesia,” “pseudo-synaesthesia,” or “synaesthesia-like” phenomena in non-synaesthetic participants. Although the intention of these studies has been to try and shed light on the way in w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deroy, Ophelia, Spence, Charles
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3796258/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24133468
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00660
_version_ 1782287447705518080
author Deroy, Ophelia
Spence, Charles
author_facet Deroy, Ophelia
Spence, Charles
author_sort Deroy, Ophelia
collection PubMed
description The last few years have seen the publication of a number of studies by researchers claiming to have induced “synaesthesia,” “pseudo-synaesthesia,” or “synaesthesia-like” phenomena in non-synaesthetic participants. Although the intention of these studies has been to try and shed light on the way in which synaesthesia might have been acquired in developmental synaesthestes, we argue that they may only have documented a phenomenon that has elsewhere been accounted for in terms of the acquisition of sensory associations and is not evidently linked to synaesthesia. As synaesthesia remains largely defined in terms of the involuntary elicitation of conscious concurrents, we suggest that the theoretical rapprochement with synaesthesia (in any of its guises) is unnecessary, and potentially distracting. It might therefore, be less confusing if researchers were to avoid referring to synaesthesia when characterizing cases that lack robust evidence of a conscious manifestation. Even in the case of those other conditions for which conscious experiences are better evidenced, when training has been occurred during hypnotic suggestion, or when it has been combined with drugs, we argue that not every conscious manifestation should necessarily be counted as synaesthetic. Finally, we stress that cases of associative learning are unlikely to shed light on two highly specific characteristic of the majority of cases of developmental synaesthesia in terms of learning patterns: First, their resistance to change through exposure once the synaesthetic repertoire has been fixed; Second, the transfer of conditioned responses between concurrents and inducers after training. We conclude by questioning whether, in adulthood, it is ever possible to acquire the kind of synaesthesia that is typically documented in the developmental form of the condition. The available evidence instead seems to point to there being a critical period for the development of synaesthesia, probably only in those with a genetic predisposition to develop the condition.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3796258
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37962582013-10-16 Training, hypnosis, and drugs: artificial synaesthesia, or artificial paradises? Deroy, Ophelia Spence, Charles Front Psychol Psychology The last few years have seen the publication of a number of studies by researchers claiming to have induced “synaesthesia,” “pseudo-synaesthesia,” or “synaesthesia-like” phenomena in non-synaesthetic participants. Although the intention of these studies has been to try and shed light on the way in which synaesthesia might have been acquired in developmental synaesthestes, we argue that they may only have documented a phenomenon that has elsewhere been accounted for in terms of the acquisition of sensory associations and is not evidently linked to synaesthesia. As synaesthesia remains largely defined in terms of the involuntary elicitation of conscious concurrents, we suggest that the theoretical rapprochement with synaesthesia (in any of its guises) is unnecessary, and potentially distracting. It might therefore, be less confusing if researchers were to avoid referring to synaesthesia when characterizing cases that lack robust evidence of a conscious manifestation. Even in the case of those other conditions for which conscious experiences are better evidenced, when training has been occurred during hypnotic suggestion, or when it has been combined with drugs, we argue that not every conscious manifestation should necessarily be counted as synaesthetic. Finally, we stress that cases of associative learning are unlikely to shed light on two highly specific characteristic of the majority of cases of developmental synaesthesia in terms of learning patterns: First, their resistance to change through exposure once the synaesthetic repertoire has been fixed; Second, the transfer of conditioned responses between concurrents and inducers after training. We conclude by questioning whether, in adulthood, it is ever possible to acquire the kind of synaesthesia that is typically documented in the developmental form of the condition. The available evidence instead seems to point to there being a critical period for the development of synaesthesia, probably only in those with a genetic predisposition to develop the condition. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3796258/ /pubmed/24133468 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00660 Text en Copyright © 2013 Deroy and Spence. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Deroy, Ophelia
Spence, Charles
Training, hypnosis, and drugs: artificial synaesthesia, or artificial paradises?
title Training, hypnosis, and drugs: artificial synaesthesia, or artificial paradises?
title_full Training, hypnosis, and drugs: artificial synaesthesia, or artificial paradises?
title_fullStr Training, hypnosis, and drugs: artificial synaesthesia, or artificial paradises?
title_full_unstemmed Training, hypnosis, and drugs: artificial synaesthesia, or artificial paradises?
title_short Training, hypnosis, and drugs: artificial synaesthesia, or artificial paradises?
title_sort training, hypnosis, and drugs: artificial synaesthesia, or artificial paradises?
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3796258/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24133468
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00660
work_keys_str_mv AT deroyophelia traininghypnosisanddrugsartificialsynaesthesiaorartificialparadises
AT spencecharles traininghypnosisanddrugsartificialsynaesthesiaorartificialparadises