Cargando…

Clinical neuropathology practice guide 5-2013: markers of neuronal maturation

This review surveys immunocytochemical and histochemical markers of neuronal lineage for application to tissue sections of fetal and neonatal brain. They determine maturation of individual nerve cells as the tissue progresses to mature architecture. From a developmental perspective, neuronal markers...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Sarnat, Harvey B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dustri-Verlag Dr. Karl Feistle 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3796735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23883617
http://dx.doi.org/10.5414/NP300638
_version_ 1782287531122884608
author Sarnat, Harvey B.
author_facet Sarnat, Harvey B.
author_sort Sarnat, Harvey B.
collection PubMed
description This review surveys immunocytochemical and histochemical markers of neuronal lineage for application to tissue sections of fetal and neonatal brain. They determine maturation of individual nerve cells as the tissue progresses to mature architecture. From a developmental perspective, neuronal markers are all about timing. These diverse cellular labels may be classified in two ways: 1) time of onset of expression (early; intermediate; late); 2) labeling of subcellular structures or metabolic functions (nucleoproteins; synaptic vesicle proteins; enolases; cytoskeletal elements; calcium-binding; nucleic acids; mitochondria). Apart from these positive markers of maturation, other negative markers are expressed in primitive neuroepithelial cells and early stages of neuroblast maturation, but no longer are demonstrated after initial stages of maturation. These examinations are relevant for studies of normal neuroembryology at the cellular level. In fetal and perinatal neuropathology they provide control criteria for application to malformations of the brain, inborn metabolic disorders and acquired fetal insults in which neuroblastic maturation may be altered. Disorders, in which cells differentiate abnormally, as in tuberous sclerosis and hemimegalencephaly, pose another yet aspect of mixed cellular lineage. The measurement in living patients, especially neonates, of serum and CSF levels of enolases, chromogranins and S-100 proteins as biomarkers of brain damage may potentially be correlated with their corresponding tissue markers at autopsy in infants who do not survive. The neuropathological markers here described can be performed in ordinary hospital laboratories, not just research facilities, and offer another dimension of diagnostic precision in interpreting abnormally developed fetal and postnatal brains.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3796735
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Dustri-Verlag Dr. Karl Feistle
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37967352013-11-05 Clinical neuropathology practice guide 5-2013: markers of neuronal maturation Sarnat, Harvey B. Clin Neuropathol Review Article This review surveys immunocytochemical and histochemical markers of neuronal lineage for application to tissue sections of fetal and neonatal brain. They determine maturation of individual nerve cells as the tissue progresses to mature architecture. From a developmental perspective, neuronal markers are all about timing. These diverse cellular labels may be classified in two ways: 1) time of onset of expression (early; intermediate; late); 2) labeling of subcellular structures or metabolic functions (nucleoproteins; synaptic vesicle proteins; enolases; cytoskeletal elements; calcium-binding; nucleic acids; mitochondria). Apart from these positive markers of maturation, other negative markers are expressed in primitive neuroepithelial cells and early stages of neuroblast maturation, but no longer are demonstrated after initial stages of maturation. These examinations are relevant for studies of normal neuroembryology at the cellular level. In fetal and perinatal neuropathology they provide control criteria for application to malformations of the brain, inborn metabolic disorders and acquired fetal insults in which neuroblastic maturation may be altered. Disorders, in which cells differentiate abnormally, as in tuberous sclerosis and hemimegalencephaly, pose another yet aspect of mixed cellular lineage. The measurement in living patients, especially neonates, of serum and CSF levels of enolases, chromogranins and S-100 proteins as biomarkers of brain damage may potentially be correlated with their corresponding tissue markers at autopsy in infants who do not survive. The neuropathological markers here described can be performed in ordinary hospital laboratories, not just research facilities, and offer another dimension of diagnostic precision in interpreting abnormally developed fetal and postnatal brains. Dustri-Verlag Dr. Karl Feistle 2013 2013-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3796735/ /pubmed/23883617 http://dx.doi.org/10.5414/NP300638 Text en © Dustri-Verlag Dr. K. Feistle http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Sarnat, Harvey B.
Clinical neuropathology practice guide 5-2013: markers of neuronal maturation
title Clinical neuropathology practice guide 5-2013: markers of neuronal maturation
title_full Clinical neuropathology practice guide 5-2013: markers of neuronal maturation
title_fullStr Clinical neuropathology practice guide 5-2013: markers of neuronal maturation
title_full_unstemmed Clinical neuropathology practice guide 5-2013: markers of neuronal maturation
title_short Clinical neuropathology practice guide 5-2013: markers of neuronal maturation
title_sort clinical neuropathology practice guide 5-2013: markers of neuronal maturation
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3796735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23883617
http://dx.doi.org/10.5414/NP300638
work_keys_str_mv AT sarnatharveyb clinicalneuropathologypracticeguide52013markersofneuronalmaturation