Cargando…

Outcome of distraction interference arthrodesis of the sacroiliac joint for sacroiliac arthritis

BACKGROUND: After lumbar or lumbosacral fusion for various spine disorders, adjacent segment disease has been reported. Most of the studies have focused on proximal segment disease. The author has reported sacroiliac joint degeneration in these patients. Based on our own experiences with an increasi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Endres, Stefan, Ludwig, Esther
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3796914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24133301
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.118197
_version_ 1782287552528515072
author Endres, Stefan
Ludwig, Esther
author_facet Endres, Stefan
Ludwig, Esther
author_sort Endres, Stefan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: After lumbar or lumbosacral fusion for various spine disorders, adjacent segment disease has been reported. Most of the studies have focused on proximal segment disease. The author has reported sacroiliac joint degeneration in these patients. Based on our own experiences with an increasing number of patients with sacroiliac joint (SIJ) arthralgia after multi-level lumbar or lumbosacral fusion procedures, we evaluated a surgical procedure called distraction arthrodesis of the SIJ for patients with refractory severe pain of the SIJ. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nineteen (19) consecutive patients were recruited and evaluated prospectively after undergoing distraction arthrodesis of the SIJ. The inclusion criteria for the surgical procedure were degeneration of the SIJ and failed conservative treatment. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans and CT scans were performed in all cases. The clinical outcome was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). CT scans were performed postoperatively and again at the final followup to evaluate assess fusion. The data was analyzed using the SPSS software (version 10.0; SPSS, Chicago, IL) and statistical analysis was performed. The P values were based on the Student t-test. RESULTS: The mean followup was 13.2 months. All patients had an instrumented lumbar or lumbosacral fusion. The overall fusion rate of SIJ was 78.9% (15/19 joints). All patients demonstrated significant improvement in VAS and ODI scores compared to preoperative values. The mean VAS score was 8.5 before surgery and was 6 at final followup, demonstrating 30% improvement. The mean ODI scores were 64.1 before surgery and 56.97 at the final followup, demonstrating 12% improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Refractory sacroiliac pain as a result of multi-level fusion surgery can be successfully treated with minimally invasive arthrodesis. It offers a safe and effective treatment for severe SIJ pain. Careful patient selection is important.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3796914
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37969142013-10-16 Outcome of distraction interference arthrodesis of the sacroiliac joint for sacroiliac arthritis Endres, Stefan Ludwig, Esther Indian J Orthop Original Article BACKGROUND: After lumbar or lumbosacral fusion for various spine disorders, adjacent segment disease has been reported. Most of the studies have focused on proximal segment disease. The author has reported sacroiliac joint degeneration in these patients. Based on our own experiences with an increasing number of patients with sacroiliac joint (SIJ) arthralgia after multi-level lumbar or lumbosacral fusion procedures, we evaluated a surgical procedure called distraction arthrodesis of the SIJ for patients with refractory severe pain of the SIJ. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nineteen (19) consecutive patients were recruited and evaluated prospectively after undergoing distraction arthrodesis of the SIJ. The inclusion criteria for the surgical procedure were degeneration of the SIJ and failed conservative treatment. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans and CT scans were performed in all cases. The clinical outcome was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). CT scans were performed postoperatively and again at the final followup to evaluate assess fusion. The data was analyzed using the SPSS software (version 10.0; SPSS, Chicago, IL) and statistical analysis was performed. The P values were based on the Student t-test. RESULTS: The mean followup was 13.2 months. All patients had an instrumented lumbar or lumbosacral fusion. The overall fusion rate of SIJ was 78.9% (15/19 joints). All patients demonstrated significant improvement in VAS and ODI scores compared to preoperative values. The mean VAS score was 8.5 before surgery and was 6 at final followup, demonstrating 30% improvement. The mean ODI scores were 64.1 before surgery and 56.97 at the final followup, demonstrating 12% improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Refractory sacroiliac pain as a result of multi-level fusion surgery can be successfully treated with minimally invasive arthrodesis. It offers a safe and effective treatment for severe SIJ pain. Careful patient selection is important. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3796914/ /pubmed/24133301 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.118197 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Orthopaedics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Endres, Stefan
Ludwig, Esther
Outcome of distraction interference arthrodesis of the sacroiliac joint for sacroiliac arthritis
title Outcome of distraction interference arthrodesis of the sacroiliac joint for sacroiliac arthritis
title_full Outcome of distraction interference arthrodesis of the sacroiliac joint for sacroiliac arthritis
title_fullStr Outcome of distraction interference arthrodesis of the sacroiliac joint for sacroiliac arthritis
title_full_unstemmed Outcome of distraction interference arthrodesis of the sacroiliac joint for sacroiliac arthritis
title_short Outcome of distraction interference arthrodesis of the sacroiliac joint for sacroiliac arthritis
title_sort outcome of distraction interference arthrodesis of the sacroiliac joint for sacroiliac arthritis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3796914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24133301
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.118197
work_keys_str_mv AT endresstefan outcomeofdistractioninterferencearthrodesisofthesacroiliacjointforsacroiliacarthritis
AT ludwigesther outcomeofdistractioninterferencearthrodesisofthesacroiliacjointforsacroiliacarthritis