Cargando…

Artificial and bioartificial liver support systems for acute and acute-on-chronic hepatic failure: A meta-analysis and meta-regression

Artificial and bioartificial liver support systems (LSSs) appear to be safe and effective in the treatment of acute and acute-on-chronic hepatic failure (AHF and AOCHF); however, individually published studies and previous meta-analyses have revealed inconclusive results. The aim of the present meta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: ZHENG, ZHEN, LI, XU, LI, ZHILIANG, MA, XIAOCHUN
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: D.A. Spandidos 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3797301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24137292
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2013.1241
_version_ 1782287598365966336
author ZHENG, ZHEN
LI, XU
LI, ZHILIANG
MA, XIAOCHUN
author_facet ZHENG, ZHEN
LI, XU
LI, ZHILIANG
MA, XIAOCHUN
author_sort ZHENG, ZHEN
collection PubMed
description Artificial and bioartificial liver support systems (LSSs) appear to be safe and effective in the treatment of acute and acute-on-chronic hepatic failure (AHF and AOCHF); however, individually published studies and previous meta-analyses have revealed inconclusive results. The aim of the present meta-analysis was to derive a more precise estimation of the benefits and disadvantages of artificial and bioartificial LSSs for patients with AHF and AOCHF. A literature search was conducted in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Chinese Biomedical (CBM) databases for publications prior to March 1, 2013. Crude relative risks (RRs) or standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated using either the fixed effects or random effects models. Nineteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included, which comprised a total of 566 patients with AHF and 371 patients with AOCHF. The meta-analysis showed that artificial LSS therapy significantly reduced mortality in patients with AOCHF; however, it had no apparent effect on total mortality in patients with AHF. The results also indicated that the use of bioartificial LSSs was correlated with decreased mortality in patients with AHF. A significant reduction in the bridging to liver transplantation was observed in patients with AOCHF following artificial LSS therapy; however, similar results were not observed in patients with AHF. Patients with AHF and those with AOCHF showed significant reductions in total bilirubin levels following artificial LSS therapy. There were no significantly increased risks of hepatic encephalopathy or bleeding in either the patients with AHF or AOCHF following artificial or bioartificial LSS therapies. Univariate and multivariate meta-regression analyses confirmed that none of the factors explained the heterogeneity. The present meta-analysis indicated that artificial LSSs reduce mortality in patients with AOCHF, while the use of bioartificial LSSs was correlated with reduced mortality in patients with AHF.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3797301
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher D.A. Spandidos
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37973012013-10-17 Artificial and bioartificial liver support systems for acute and acute-on-chronic hepatic failure: A meta-analysis and meta-regression ZHENG, ZHEN LI, XU LI, ZHILIANG MA, XIAOCHUN Exp Ther Med Articles Artificial and bioartificial liver support systems (LSSs) appear to be safe and effective in the treatment of acute and acute-on-chronic hepatic failure (AHF and AOCHF); however, individually published studies and previous meta-analyses have revealed inconclusive results. The aim of the present meta-analysis was to derive a more precise estimation of the benefits and disadvantages of artificial and bioartificial LSSs for patients with AHF and AOCHF. A literature search was conducted in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Chinese Biomedical (CBM) databases for publications prior to March 1, 2013. Crude relative risks (RRs) or standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated using either the fixed effects or random effects models. Nineteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included, which comprised a total of 566 patients with AHF and 371 patients with AOCHF. The meta-analysis showed that artificial LSS therapy significantly reduced mortality in patients with AOCHF; however, it had no apparent effect on total mortality in patients with AHF. The results also indicated that the use of bioartificial LSSs was correlated with decreased mortality in patients with AHF. A significant reduction in the bridging to liver transplantation was observed in patients with AOCHF following artificial LSS therapy; however, similar results were not observed in patients with AHF. Patients with AHF and those with AOCHF showed significant reductions in total bilirubin levels following artificial LSS therapy. There were no significantly increased risks of hepatic encephalopathy or bleeding in either the patients with AHF or AOCHF following artificial or bioartificial LSS therapies. Univariate and multivariate meta-regression analyses confirmed that none of the factors explained the heterogeneity. The present meta-analysis indicated that artificial LSSs reduce mortality in patients with AOCHF, while the use of bioartificial LSSs was correlated with reduced mortality in patients with AHF. D.A. Spandidos 2013-10 2013-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3797301/ /pubmed/24137292 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2013.1241 Text en Copyright © 2013, Spandidos Publications http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an open-access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. The article may be redistributed, reproduced, and reused for non-commercial purposes, provided the original source is properly cited.
spellingShingle Articles
ZHENG, ZHEN
LI, XU
LI, ZHILIANG
MA, XIAOCHUN
Artificial and bioartificial liver support systems for acute and acute-on-chronic hepatic failure: A meta-analysis and meta-regression
title Artificial and bioartificial liver support systems for acute and acute-on-chronic hepatic failure: A meta-analysis and meta-regression
title_full Artificial and bioartificial liver support systems for acute and acute-on-chronic hepatic failure: A meta-analysis and meta-regression
title_fullStr Artificial and bioartificial liver support systems for acute and acute-on-chronic hepatic failure: A meta-analysis and meta-regression
title_full_unstemmed Artificial and bioartificial liver support systems for acute and acute-on-chronic hepatic failure: A meta-analysis and meta-regression
title_short Artificial and bioartificial liver support systems for acute and acute-on-chronic hepatic failure: A meta-analysis and meta-regression
title_sort artificial and bioartificial liver support systems for acute and acute-on-chronic hepatic failure: a meta-analysis and meta-regression
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3797301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24137292
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2013.1241
work_keys_str_mv AT zhengzhen artificialandbioartificialliversupportsystemsforacuteandacuteonchronichepaticfailureametaanalysisandmetaregression
AT lixu artificialandbioartificialliversupportsystemsforacuteandacuteonchronichepaticfailureametaanalysisandmetaregression
AT lizhiliang artificialandbioartificialliversupportsystemsforacuteandacuteonchronichepaticfailureametaanalysisandmetaregression
AT maxiaochun artificialandbioartificialliversupportsystemsforacuteandacuteonchronichepaticfailureametaanalysisandmetaregression