Cargando…

Dosimetric effects of prone and supine positions on post-implant assessments for prostate brachytherapy

PURPOSE: Post-implant dosimetric assessment is essential for optimal care of patients receiving prostate brachytherapy. In most institutions, post-implant computed tomography (CT) is performed in the supine position. This study aimed to assess variability in dosimetric parameters with postural chang...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ohashi, Toshio, Momma, Tetsuo, Yamashita, Shoji, Kanai, Kunimitsu, Watanabe, Yusuke, Hanada, Takashi, Shigematsu, Naoyuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3797408/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24143145
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2013.37695
_version_ 1782287610176077824
author Ohashi, Toshio
Momma, Tetsuo
Yamashita, Shoji
Kanai, Kunimitsu
Watanabe, Yusuke
Hanada, Takashi
Shigematsu, Naoyuki
author_facet Ohashi, Toshio
Momma, Tetsuo
Yamashita, Shoji
Kanai, Kunimitsu
Watanabe, Yusuke
Hanada, Takashi
Shigematsu, Naoyuki
author_sort Ohashi, Toshio
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Post-implant dosimetric assessment is essential for optimal care of patients receiving prostate brachytherapy. In most institutions, post-implant computed tomography (CT) is performed in the supine position. This study aimed to assess variability in dosimetric parameters with postural changes during acquisition of post-implant CT scans. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In total, 85 consecutive patients were enrolled in this study. Fifty-three patients underwent seed implantation alone, and the remaining 32 received a combination of seed implantation and external beam radiotherapy. For post-implant analyses, CT scans were obtained in two patient positions, supine and prone. To evaluate differences in dosimetric parameters associated with postural change, the dosimetric data obtained in the supine position were defined as the standard. RESULTS: The median prostate volume was 22.4 ml in the supine and 22.5 ml in the prone position (p = 0.51). The median prostate D(90) was 120.1% in the supine and 120.3% in the prone position, not significantly different. The mean prostate V(100) was 97.1% in the supine and 97.0% in the prone position, again not significantly different. Median rectal V(100) in supine and prone positions were 0.42 ml and 0.33 ml, respectively (p < 0.01). Rectal D(2cc) was also significantly decreased in the prone as compared with the supine position (median, 59.1% vs. 63.6%; p < 0.01). A larger post-implant prostate volume was associated with decreased rectal doses in the prone position. CONCLUSIONS: Though there were no significant differences among prostate D(90) assessments according to postural changes, our results suggest that post-implant rectal doses decreased in the prone position.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3797408
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37974082013-10-18 Dosimetric effects of prone and supine positions on post-implant assessments for prostate brachytherapy Ohashi, Toshio Momma, Tetsuo Yamashita, Shoji Kanai, Kunimitsu Watanabe, Yusuke Hanada, Takashi Shigematsu, Naoyuki J Contemp Brachytherapy Original Paper PURPOSE: Post-implant dosimetric assessment is essential for optimal care of patients receiving prostate brachytherapy. In most institutions, post-implant computed tomography (CT) is performed in the supine position. This study aimed to assess variability in dosimetric parameters with postural changes during acquisition of post-implant CT scans. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In total, 85 consecutive patients were enrolled in this study. Fifty-three patients underwent seed implantation alone, and the remaining 32 received a combination of seed implantation and external beam radiotherapy. For post-implant analyses, CT scans were obtained in two patient positions, supine and prone. To evaluate differences in dosimetric parameters associated with postural change, the dosimetric data obtained in the supine position were defined as the standard. RESULTS: The median prostate volume was 22.4 ml in the supine and 22.5 ml in the prone position (p = 0.51). The median prostate D(90) was 120.1% in the supine and 120.3% in the prone position, not significantly different. The mean prostate V(100) was 97.1% in the supine and 97.0% in the prone position, again not significantly different. Median rectal V(100) in supine and prone positions were 0.42 ml and 0.33 ml, respectively (p < 0.01). Rectal D(2cc) was also significantly decreased in the prone as compared with the supine position (median, 59.1% vs. 63.6%; p < 0.01). A larger post-implant prostate volume was associated with decreased rectal doses in the prone position. CONCLUSIONS: Though there were no significant differences among prostate D(90) assessments according to postural changes, our results suggest that post-implant rectal doses decreased in the prone position. Termedia Publishing House 2013-09-20 2013-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3797408/ /pubmed/24143145 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2013.37695 Text en Copyright © 2013 Termedia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Ohashi, Toshio
Momma, Tetsuo
Yamashita, Shoji
Kanai, Kunimitsu
Watanabe, Yusuke
Hanada, Takashi
Shigematsu, Naoyuki
Dosimetric effects of prone and supine positions on post-implant assessments for prostate brachytherapy
title Dosimetric effects of prone and supine positions on post-implant assessments for prostate brachytherapy
title_full Dosimetric effects of prone and supine positions on post-implant assessments for prostate brachytherapy
title_fullStr Dosimetric effects of prone and supine positions on post-implant assessments for prostate brachytherapy
title_full_unstemmed Dosimetric effects of prone and supine positions on post-implant assessments for prostate brachytherapy
title_short Dosimetric effects of prone and supine positions on post-implant assessments for prostate brachytherapy
title_sort dosimetric effects of prone and supine positions on post-implant assessments for prostate brachytherapy
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3797408/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24143145
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2013.37695
work_keys_str_mv AT ohashitoshio dosimetriceffectsofproneandsupinepositionsonpostimplantassessmentsforprostatebrachytherapy
AT mommatetsuo dosimetriceffectsofproneandsupinepositionsonpostimplantassessmentsforprostatebrachytherapy
AT yamashitashoji dosimetriceffectsofproneandsupinepositionsonpostimplantassessmentsforprostatebrachytherapy
AT kanaikunimitsu dosimetriceffectsofproneandsupinepositionsonpostimplantassessmentsforprostatebrachytherapy
AT watanabeyusuke dosimetriceffectsofproneandsupinepositionsonpostimplantassessmentsforprostatebrachytherapy
AT hanadatakashi dosimetriceffectsofproneandsupinepositionsonpostimplantassessmentsforprostatebrachytherapy
AT shigematsunaoyuki dosimetriceffectsofproneandsupinepositionsonpostimplantassessmentsforprostatebrachytherapy