Cargando…

Permanent prostate brachytherapy extracapsular radiation dose distributions: analysis of a multi-institutional database

PURPOSE: Periprostatic brachytherapy doses impact biochemical control. In this study, we evaluate extracapsular volumetric dosimetry following permanent prostate brachytherapy in patients entered in a multi-institutional community database. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the database, 4547 patients underw...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Merrick, Gregory S., Butler, Wayne M., Grimm, Peter, Morris, Mallory, Lief, Jonathan H., Bennett, Abbey, Fiano, Ryan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3797411/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24143144
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2013.37941
_version_ 1782287610874429440
author Merrick, Gregory S.
Butler, Wayne M.
Grimm, Peter
Morris, Mallory
Lief, Jonathan H.
Bennett, Abbey
Fiano, Ryan
author_facet Merrick, Gregory S.
Butler, Wayne M.
Grimm, Peter
Morris, Mallory
Lief, Jonathan H.
Bennett, Abbey
Fiano, Ryan
author_sort Merrick, Gregory S.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Periprostatic brachytherapy doses impact biochemical control. In this study, we evaluate extracapsular volumetric dosimetry following permanent prostate brachytherapy in patients entered in a multi-institutional community database. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the database, 4547 patients underwent brachytherapy (3094 – (125)I, 1437 – (103)Pd and 16 – (131)Cs). Using the originally determined prostate volume, a 5 mm, 3-dimensional peri-prostatic anulus was constructed around the prostate (except for a 2 mm posterior margin), and evaluated in its entirety and in 90° segments. Prostate dosimetric parameters consisted of a V(100) and D(90) while the annular dosimetry was reported as a V(100). RESULTS: The intraprostatic V(100) and D(90) for (103)Pd, and (125)I were statistically comparable when stratified by isotope and/or monotherapy vs. boost. The overall mean V(100) for the periprostatic annulus was 62.8%. The mean V(100) at the base (51.6%) was substantially less than the apex (73.5%) and midgland (65.9%). In addition, for all patients, the anterior V(100) (45.7%) was less than the lateral (68.8%) and the posterior (75.0%). The geometric V(100) annular differences were consistent when evaluated by isotope. Overall, the V(100) was higher in the (125)I cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal extracapsular brachytherapy dose and radial extent remains unknown, but will prove increasingly important with reductions and/or elimination of supplemental external beam radiation therapy. The large multi-institutional community database demonstrates periprostatic annular doses that are not as robust as those in selected high volume brachytherapy centers, and may be inadequate for optimal biochemical control following monotherapeutic brachytherapy, especially in higher risk patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3797411
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37974112013-10-18 Permanent prostate brachytherapy extracapsular radiation dose distributions: analysis of a multi-institutional database Merrick, Gregory S. Butler, Wayne M. Grimm, Peter Morris, Mallory Lief, Jonathan H. Bennett, Abbey Fiano, Ryan J Contemp Brachytherapy Original Paper PURPOSE: Periprostatic brachytherapy doses impact biochemical control. In this study, we evaluate extracapsular volumetric dosimetry following permanent prostate brachytherapy in patients entered in a multi-institutional community database. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the database, 4547 patients underwent brachytherapy (3094 – (125)I, 1437 – (103)Pd and 16 – (131)Cs). Using the originally determined prostate volume, a 5 mm, 3-dimensional peri-prostatic anulus was constructed around the prostate (except for a 2 mm posterior margin), and evaluated in its entirety and in 90° segments. Prostate dosimetric parameters consisted of a V(100) and D(90) while the annular dosimetry was reported as a V(100). RESULTS: The intraprostatic V(100) and D(90) for (103)Pd, and (125)I were statistically comparable when stratified by isotope and/or monotherapy vs. boost. The overall mean V(100) for the periprostatic annulus was 62.8%. The mean V(100) at the base (51.6%) was substantially less than the apex (73.5%) and midgland (65.9%). In addition, for all patients, the anterior V(100) (45.7%) was less than the lateral (68.8%) and the posterior (75.0%). The geometric V(100) annular differences were consistent when evaluated by isotope. Overall, the V(100) was higher in the (125)I cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal extracapsular brachytherapy dose and radial extent remains unknown, but will prove increasingly important with reductions and/or elimination of supplemental external beam radiation therapy. The large multi-institutional community database demonstrates periprostatic annular doses that are not as robust as those in selected high volume brachytherapy centers, and may be inadequate for optimal biochemical control following monotherapeutic brachytherapy, especially in higher risk patients. Termedia Publishing House 2013-10-02 2013-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3797411/ /pubmed/24143144 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2013.37941 Text en Copyright © 2013 Termedia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Merrick, Gregory S.
Butler, Wayne M.
Grimm, Peter
Morris, Mallory
Lief, Jonathan H.
Bennett, Abbey
Fiano, Ryan
Permanent prostate brachytherapy extracapsular radiation dose distributions: analysis of a multi-institutional database
title Permanent prostate brachytherapy extracapsular radiation dose distributions: analysis of a multi-institutional database
title_full Permanent prostate brachytherapy extracapsular radiation dose distributions: analysis of a multi-institutional database
title_fullStr Permanent prostate brachytherapy extracapsular radiation dose distributions: analysis of a multi-institutional database
title_full_unstemmed Permanent prostate brachytherapy extracapsular radiation dose distributions: analysis of a multi-institutional database
title_short Permanent prostate brachytherapy extracapsular radiation dose distributions: analysis of a multi-institutional database
title_sort permanent prostate brachytherapy extracapsular radiation dose distributions: analysis of a multi-institutional database
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3797411/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24143144
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2013.37941
work_keys_str_mv AT merrickgregorys permanentprostatebrachytherapyextracapsularradiationdosedistributionsanalysisofamultiinstitutionaldatabase
AT butlerwaynem permanentprostatebrachytherapyextracapsularradiationdosedistributionsanalysisofamultiinstitutionaldatabase
AT grimmpeter permanentprostatebrachytherapyextracapsularradiationdosedistributionsanalysisofamultiinstitutionaldatabase
AT morrismallory permanentprostatebrachytherapyextracapsularradiationdosedistributionsanalysisofamultiinstitutionaldatabase
AT liefjonathanh permanentprostatebrachytherapyextracapsularradiationdosedistributionsanalysisofamultiinstitutionaldatabase
AT bennettabbey permanentprostatebrachytherapyextracapsularradiationdosedistributionsanalysisofamultiinstitutionaldatabase
AT fianoryan permanentprostatebrachytherapyextracapsularradiationdosedistributionsanalysisofamultiinstitutionaldatabase