Cargando…

Controversies over the mechanisms underlying the crucial role of the left fronto-parietal areas in the representation of tools

Anatomo-clinical and neuroimaging data show that the left fronto-parietal areas play an important role in representing tools. As manipulation is an important source of knowledge about tools, it has been assumed that motor activity explains the link between tool knowledge and the left fronto-parietal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Gainotti, Guido
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3797468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24137144
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00727
_version_ 1782287618831024128
author Gainotti, Guido
author_facet Gainotti, Guido
author_sort Gainotti, Guido
collection PubMed
description Anatomo-clinical and neuroimaging data show that the left fronto-parietal areas play an important role in representing tools. As manipulation is an important source of knowledge about tools, it has been assumed that motor activity explains the link between tool knowledge and the left fronto-parietal areas. However, controversies exist over the exact mechanisms underlying this relationship. According to a strong version of the “embodied cognition theory,” activation of a tool concept necessarily involves re-enactment of the corresponding kind of action. Impairment of the ability to use tools should, therefore, lead to impairment of tool knowledge. Both the “domains of knowledge hypothesis” and the “sensory-motor model of conceptual knowledge” refute the strong version of the “embodied cognition hypothesis” but acknowledge that manipulation and other action schemata play an important role in our knowledge of tools. The basic difference between these two models is that the former is based on an innate model and the latter holds that the brain’s organization of categories is experience dependent. Data supporting and arguing against each of these models are briefly reviewed. In particular, the following lines of research, which argue against the innate nature of the brain’s categorical organization, are discussed: (1) the observation that in patients with category-specific disorders the semantic impairment does not respect the boundaries between biological entities and artifact items; (2) data showing that experience-driven neuroplasticity in musicians is not confined to alterations of perceptual and motor maps but also leads to the establishment of higher-level semantic representations for musical instruments; (3) results of experiments using previously unfamiliar materials showing that the history of our sensory-motor experience with an object significantly affects its neural representation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3797468
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37974682013-10-17 Controversies over the mechanisms underlying the crucial role of the left fronto-parietal areas in the representation of tools Gainotti, Guido Front Psychol Psychology Anatomo-clinical and neuroimaging data show that the left fronto-parietal areas play an important role in representing tools. As manipulation is an important source of knowledge about tools, it has been assumed that motor activity explains the link between tool knowledge and the left fronto-parietal areas. However, controversies exist over the exact mechanisms underlying this relationship. According to a strong version of the “embodied cognition theory,” activation of a tool concept necessarily involves re-enactment of the corresponding kind of action. Impairment of the ability to use tools should, therefore, lead to impairment of tool knowledge. Both the “domains of knowledge hypothesis” and the “sensory-motor model of conceptual knowledge” refute the strong version of the “embodied cognition hypothesis” but acknowledge that manipulation and other action schemata play an important role in our knowledge of tools. The basic difference between these two models is that the former is based on an innate model and the latter holds that the brain’s organization of categories is experience dependent. Data supporting and arguing against each of these models are briefly reviewed. In particular, the following lines of research, which argue against the innate nature of the brain’s categorical organization, are discussed: (1) the observation that in patients with category-specific disorders the semantic impairment does not respect the boundaries between biological entities and artifact items; (2) data showing that experience-driven neuroplasticity in musicians is not confined to alterations of perceptual and motor maps but also leads to the establishment of higher-level semantic representations for musical instruments; (3) results of experiments using previously unfamiliar materials showing that the history of our sensory-motor experience with an object significantly affects its neural representation. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3797468/ /pubmed/24137144 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00727 Text en Copyright © Gainotti. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Gainotti, Guido
Controversies over the mechanisms underlying the crucial role of the left fronto-parietal areas in the representation of tools
title Controversies over the mechanisms underlying the crucial role of the left fronto-parietal areas in the representation of tools
title_full Controversies over the mechanisms underlying the crucial role of the left fronto-parietal areas in the representation of tools
title_fullStr Controversies over the mechanisms underlying the crucial role of the left fronto-parietal areas in the representation of tools
title_full_unstemmed Controversies over the mechanisms underlying the crucial role of the left fronto-parietal areas in the representation of tools
title_short Controversies over the mechanisms underlying the crucial role of the left fronto-parietal areas in the representation of tools
title_sort controversies over the mechanisms underlying the crucial role of the left fronto-parietal areas in the representation of tools
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3797468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24137144
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00727
work_keys_str_mv AT gainottiguido controversiesoverthemechanismsunderlyingthecrucialroleoftheleftfrontoparietalareasintherepresentationoftools