Cargando…

Is Consumer Response to Plain/Standardised Tobacco Packaging Consistent with Framework Convention on Tobacco Control Guidelines? A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Standardised or ‘plain’ tobacco packaging was introduced in Australia in December 2012 and is currently being considered in other countries. The primary objective of this systematic review was to locate, assess and synthesise published and grey literature relating to the p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stead, Martine, Moodie, Crawford, Angus, Kathryn, Bauld, Linda, McNeill, Ann, Thomas, James, Hastings, Gerard, Hinds, Kate, O'Mara-Eves, Alison, Kwan, Irene, Purves, Richard I., Bryce, Stuart L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3797796/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24146791
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075919
_version_ 1782287670505897984
author Stead, Martine
Moodie, Crawford
Angus, Kathryn
Bauld, Linda
McNeill, Ann
Thomas, James
Hastings, Gerard
Hinds, Kate
O'Mara-Eves, Alison
Kwan, Irene
Purves, Richard I.
Bryce, Stuart L.
author_facet Stead, Martine
Moodie, Crawford
Angus, Kathryn
Bauld, Linda
McNeill, Ann
Thomas, James
Hastings, Gerard
Hinds, Kate
O'Mara-Eves, Alison
Kwan, Irene
Purves, Richard I.
Bryce, Stuart L.
author_sort Stead, Martine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Standardised or ‘plain’ tobacco packaging was introduced in Australia in December 2012 and is currently being considered in other countries. The primary objective of this systematic review was to locate, assess and synthesise published and grey literature relating to the potential impacts of standardised tobacco packaging as proposed by the guidelines for the international Framework Convention on Tobacco Control: reduced appeal, increased salience and effectiveness of health warnings, and more accurate perceptions of product strength and harm. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched and researchers in the field were contacted to identify studies. Eligible studies were published or unpublished primary research of any design, issued since 1980 and concerning tobacco packaging. Twenty-five quantitative studies reported relevant outcomes and met the inclusion criteria. A narrative synthesis was conducted. RESULTS: Studies that explored the impact of package design on appeal consistently found that standardised packaging reduced the appeal of cigarettes and smoking, and was associated with perceived lower quality, poorer taste and less desirable smoker identities. Although findings were mixed, standardised packs tended to increase the salience and effectiveness of health warnings in terms of recall, attention, believability and seriousness, with effects being mediated by the warning size, type and position on pack. Pack colour was found to influence perceptions of product harm and strength, with darker coloured standardised packs generally perceived as containing stronger tasting and more harmful cigarettes than fully branded packs; lighter coloured standardised packs suggested weaker and less harmful cigarettes. Findings were largely consistent, irrespective of location and sample. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence strongly suggests that standardised packaging will reduce the appeal of packaging and of smoking in general; that it will go some way to reduce consumer misperceptions regarding product harm based upon package design; and will help make the legally required on-pack health warnings more salient.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3797796
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37977962013-10-21 Is Consumer Response to Plain/Standardised Tobacco Packaging Consistent with Framework Convention on Tobacco Control Guidelines? A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies Stead, Martine Moodie, Crawford Angus, Kathryn Bauld, Linda McNeill, Ann Thomas, James Hastings, Gerard Hinds, Kate O'Mara-Eves, Alison Kwan, Irene Purves, Richard I. Bryce, Stuart L. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Standardised or ‘plain’ tobacco packaging was introduced in Australia in December 2012 and is currently being considered in other countries. The primary objective of this systematic review was to locate, assess and synthesise published and grey literature relating to the potential impacts of standardised tobacco packaging as proposed by the guidelines for the international Framework Convention on Tobacco Control: reduced appeal, increased salience and effectiveness of health warnings, and more accurate perceptions of product strength and harm. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched and researchers in the field were contacted to identify studies. Eligible studies were published or unpublished primary research of any design, issued since 1980 and concerning tobacco packaging. Twenty-five quantitative studies reported relevant outcomes and met the inclusion criteria. A narrative synthesis was conducted. RESULTS: Studies that explored the impact of package design on appeal consistently found that standardised packaging reduced the appeal of cigarettes and smoking, and was associated with perceived lower quality, poorer taste and less desirable smoker identities. Although findings were mixed, standardised packs tended to increase the salience and effectiveness of health warnings in terms of recall, attention, believability and seriousness, with effects being mediated by the warning size, type and position on pack. Pack colour was found to influence perceptions of product harm and strength, with darker coloured standardised packs generally perceived as containing stronger tasting and more harmful cigarettes than fully branded packs; lighter coloured standardised packs suggested weaker and less harmful cigarettes. Findings were largely consistent, irrespective of location and sample. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence strongly suggests that standardised packaging will reduce the appeal of packaging and of smoking in general; that it will go some way to reduce consumer misperceptions regarding product harm based upon package design; and will help make the legally required on-pack health warnings more salient. Public Library of Science 2013-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3797796/ /pubmed/24146791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075919 Text en © 2013 Stead et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Stead, Martine
Moodie, Crawford
Angus, Kathryn
Bauld, Linda
McNeill, Ann
Thomas, James
Hastings, Gerard
Hinds, Kate
O'Mara-Eves, Alison
Kwan, Irene
Purves, Richard I.
Bryce, Stuart L.
Is Consumer Response to Plain/Standardised Tobacco Packaging Consistent with Framework Convention on Tobacco Control Guidelines? A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies
title Is Consumer Response to Plain/Standardised Tobacco Packaging Consistent with Framework Convention on Tobacco Control Guidelines? A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies
title_full Is Consumer Response to Plain/Standardised Tobacco Packaging Consistent with Framework Convention on Tobacco Control Guidelines? A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies
title_fullStr Is Consumer Response to Plain/Standardised Tobacco Packaging Consistent with Framework Convention on Tobacco Control Guidelines? A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies
title_full_unstemmed Is Consumer Response to Plain/Standardised Tobacco Packaging Consistent with Framework Convention on Tobacco Control Guidelines? A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies
title_short Is Consumer Response to Plain/Standardised Tobacco Packaging Consistent with Framework Convention on Tobacco Control Guidelines? A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies
title_sort is consumer response to plain/standardised tobacco packaging consistent with framework convention on tobacco control guidelines? a systematic review of quantitative studies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3797796/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24146791
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075919
work_keys_str_mv AT steadmartine isconsumerresponsetoplainstandardisedtobaccopackagingconsistentwithframeworkconventionontobaccocontrolguidelinesasystematicreviewofquantitativestudies
AT moodiecrawford isconsumerresponsetoplainstandardisedtobaccopackagingconsistentwithframeworkconventionontobaccocontrolguidelinesasystematicreviewofquantitativestudies
AT anguskathryn isconsumerresponsetoplainstandardisedtobaccopackagingconsistentwithframeworkconventionontobaccocontrolguidelinesasystematicreviewofquantitativestudies
AT bauldlinda isconsumerresponsetoplainstandardisedtobaccopackagingconsistentwithframeworkconventionontobaccocontrolguidelinesasystematicreviewofquantitativestudies
AT mcneillann isconsumerresponsetoplainstandardisedtobaccopackagingconsistentwithframeworkconventionontobaccocontrolguidelinesasystematicreviewofquantitativestudies
AT thomasjames isconsumerresponsetoplainstandardisedtobaccopackagingconsistentwithframeworkconventionontobaccocontrolguidelinesasystematicreviewofquantitativestudies
AT hastingsgerard isconsumerresponsetoplainstandardisedtobaccopackagingconsistentwithframeworkconventionontobaccocontrolguidelinesasystematicreviewofquantitativestudies
AT hindskate isconsumerresponsetoplainstandardisedtobaccopackagingconsistentwithframeworkconventionontobaccocontrolguidelinesasystematicreviewofquantitativestudies
AT omaraevesalison isconsumerresponsetoplainstandardisedtobaccopackagingconsistentwithframeworkconventionontobaccocontrolguidelinesasystematicreviewofquantitativestudies
AT kwanirene isconsumerresponsetoplainstandardisedtobaccopackagingconsistentwithframeworkconventionontobaccocontrolguidelinesasystematicreviewofquantitativestudies
AT purvesrichardi isconsumerresponsetoplainstandardisedtobaccopackagingconsistentwithframeworkconventionontobaccocontrolguidelinesasystematicreviewofquantitativestudies
AT brycestuartl isconsumerresponsetoplainstandardisedtobaccopackagingconsistentwithframeworkconventionontobaccocontrolguidelinesasystematicreviewofquantitativestudies