Cargando…
Is Consumer Response to Plain/Standardised Tobacco Packaging Consistent with Framework Convention on Tobacco Control Guidelines? A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Standardised or ‘plain’ tobacco packaging was introduced in Australia in December 2012 and is currently being considered in other countries. The primary objective of this systematic review was to locate, assess and synthesise published and grey literature relating to the p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3797796/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24146791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075919 |
_version_ | 1782287670505897984 |
---|---|
author | Stead, Martine Moodie, Crawford Angus, Kathryn Bauld, Linda McNeill, Ann Thomas, James Hastings, Gerard Hinds, Kate O'Mara-Eves, Alison Kwan, Irene Purves, Richard I. Bryce, Stuart L. |
author_facet | Stead, Martine Moodie, Crawford Angus, Kathryn Bauld, Linda McNeill, Ann Thomas, James Hastings, Gerard Hinds, Kate O'Mara-Eves, Alison Kwan, Irene Purves, Richard I. Bryce, Stuart L. |
author_sort | Stead, Martine |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Standardised or ‘plain’ tobacco packaging was introduced in Australia in December 2012 and is currently being considered in other countries. The primary objective of this systematic review was to locate, assess and synthesise published and grey literature relating to the potential impacts of standardised tobacco packaging as proposed by the guidelines for the international Framework Convention on Tobacco Control: reduced appeal, increased salience and effectiveness of health warnings, and more accurate perceptions of product strength and harm. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched and researchers in the field were contacted to identify studies. Eligible studies were published or unpublished primary research of any design, issued since 1980 and concerning tobacco packaging. Twenty-five quantitative studies reported relevant outcomes and met the inclusion criteria. A narrative synthesis was conducted. RESULTS: Studies that explored the impact of package design on appeal consistently found that standardised packaging reduced the appeal of cigarettes and smoking, and was associated with perceived lower quality, poorer taste and less desirable smoker identities. Although findings were mixed, standardised packs tended to increase the salience and effectiveness of health warnings in terms of recall, attention, believability and seriousness, with effects being mediated by the warning size, type and position on pack. Pack colour was found to influence perceptions of product harm and strength, with darker coloured standardised packs generally perceived as containing stronger tasting and more harmful cigarettes than fully branded packs; lighter coloured standardised packs suggested weaker and less harmful cigarettes. Findings were largely consistent, irrespective of location and sample. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence strongly suggests that standardised packaging will reduce the appeal of packaging and of smoking in general; that it will go some way to reduce consumer misperceptions regarding product harm based upon package design; and will help make the legally required on-pack health warnings more salient. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3797796 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37977962013-10-21 Is Consumer Response to Plain/Standardised Tobacco Packaging Consistent with Framework Convention on Tobacco Control Guidelines? A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies Stead, Martine Moodie, Crawford Angus, Kathryn Bauld, Linda McNeill, Ann Thomas, James Hastings, Gerard Hinds, Kate O'Mara-Eves, Alison Kwan, Irene Purves, Richard I. Bryce, Stuart L. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Standardised or ‘plain’ tobacco packaging was introduced in Australia in December 2012 and is currently being considered in other countries. The primary objective of this systematic review was to locate, assess and synthesise published and grey literature relating to the potential impacts of standardised tobacco packaging as proposed by the guidelines for the international Framework Convention on Tobacco Control: reduced appeal, increased salience and effectiveness of health warnings, and more accurate perceptions of product strength and harm. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched and researchers in the field were contacted to identify studies. Eligible studies were published or unpublished primary research of any design, issued since 1980 and concerning tobacco packaging. Twenty-five quantitative studies reported relevant outcomes and met the inclusion criteria. A narrative synthesis was conducted. RESULTS: Studies that explored the impact of package design on appeal consistently found that standardised packaging reduced the appeal of cigarettes and smoking, and was associated with perceived lower quality, poorer taste and less desirable smoker identities. Although findings were mixed, standardised packs tended to increase the salience and effectiveness of health warnings in terms of recall, attention, believability and seriousness, with effects being mediated by the warning size, type and position on pack. Pack colour was found to influence perceptions of product harm and strength, with darker coloured standardised packs generally perceived as containing stronger tasting and more harmful cigarettes than fully branded packs; lighter coloured standardised packs suggested weaker and less harmful cigarettes. Findings were largely consistent, irrespective of location and sample. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence strongly suggests that standardised packaging will reduce the appeal of packaging and of smoking in general; that it will go some way to reduce consumer misperceptions regarding product harm based upon package design; and will help make the legally required on-pack health warnings more salient. Public Library of Science 2013-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3797796/ /pubmed/24146791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075919 Text en © 2013 Stead et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Stead, Martine Moodie, Crawford Angus, Kathryn Bauld, Linda McNeill, Ann Thomas, James Hastings, Gerard Hinds, Kate O'Mara-Eves, Alison Kwan, Irene Purves, Richard I. Bryce, Stuart L. Is Consumer Response to Plain/Standardised Tobacco Packaging Consistent with Framework Convention on Tobacco Control Guidelines? A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies |
title | Is Consumer Response to Plain/Standardised Tobacco Packaging Consistent with Framework Convention on Tobacco Control Guidelines? A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies |
title_full | Is Consumer Response to Plain/Standardised Tobacco Packaging Consistent with Framework Convention on Tobacco Control Guidelines? A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies |
title_fullStr | Is Consumer Response to Plain/Standardised Tobacco Packaging Consistent with Framework Convention on Tobacco Control Guidelines? A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Is Consumer Response to Plain/Standardised Tobacco Packaging Consistent with Framework Convention on Tobacco Control Guidelines? A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies |
title_short | Is Consumer Response to Plain/Standardised Tobacco Packaging Consistent with Framework Convention on Tobacco Control Guidelines? A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies |
title_sort | is consumer response to plain/standardised tobacco packaging consistent with framework convention on tobacco control guidelines? a systematic review of quantitative studies |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3797796/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24146791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075919 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT steadmartine isconsumerresponsetoplainstandardisedtobaccopackagingconsistentwithframeworkconventionontobaccocontrolguidelinesasystematicreviewofquantitativestudies AT moodiecrawford isconsumerresponsetoplainstandardisedtobaccopackagingconsistentwithframeworkconventionontobaccocontrolguidelinesasystematicreviewofquantitativestudies AT anguskathryn isconsumerresponsetoplainstandardisedtobaccopackagingconsistentwithframeworkconventionontobaccocontrolguidelinesasystematicreviewofquantitativestudies AT bauldlinda isconsumerresponsetoplainstandardisedtobaccopackagingconsistentwithframeworkconventionontobaccocontrolguidelinesasystematicreviewofquantitativestudies AT mcneillann isconsumerresponsetoplainstandardisedtobaccopackagingconsistentwithframeworkconventionontobaccocontrolguidelinesasystematicreviewofquantitativestudies AT thomasjames isconsumerresponsetoplainstandardisedtobaccopackagingconsistentwithframeworkconventionontobaccocontrolguidelinesasystematicreviewofquantitativestudies AT hastingsgerard isconsumerresponsetoplainstandardisedtobaccopackagingconsistentwithframeworkconventionontobaccocontrolguidelinesasystematicreviewofquantitativestudies AT hindskate isconsumerresponsetoplainstandardisedtobaccopackagingconsistentwithframeworkconventionontobaccocontrolguidelinesasystematicreviewofquantitativestudies AT omaraevesalison isconsumerresponsetoplainstandardisedtobaccopackagingconsistentwithframeworkconventionontobaccocontrolguidelinesasystematicreviewofquantitativestudies AT kwanirene isconsumerresponsetoplainstandardisedtobaccopackagingconsistentwithframeworkconventionontobaccocontrolguidelinesasystematicreviewofquantitativestudies AT purvesrichardi isconsumerresponsetoplainstandardisedtobaccopackagingconsistentwithframeworkconventionontobaccocontrolguidelinesasystematicreviewofquantitativestudies AT brycestuartl isconsumerresponsetoplainstandardisedtobaccopackagingconsistentwithframeworkconventionontobaccocontrolguidelinesasystematicreviewofquantitativestudies |