Cargando…

The focus of attention in working memory—from metaphors to mechanisms

Many verbal theories describe working memory (WM) in terms of physical metaphors such as information flow or information containers. These metaphors are often useful but can also be misleading. This article contrasts the verbal version of the author's three-embedded-component theory with a comp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Oberauer, Klaus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3797978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24146644
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00673
_version_ 1782287700760461312
author Oberauer, Klaus
author_facet Oberauer, Klaus
author_sort Oberauer, Klaus
collection PubMed
description Many verbal theories describe working memory (WM) in terms of physical metaphors such as information flow or information containers. These metaphors are often useful but can also be misleading. This article contrasts the verbal version of the author's three-embedded-component theory with a computational implementation of the theory. The analysis focuses on phenomena that have been attributed to the focus of attention in WM. The verbal theory characterizes the focus of attention by a container metaphor, which gives rise to questions such as: how many items fit into the focus? The computational model explains the same phenomena mechanistically through a combination of strengthened bindings between items and their retrieval cues, and priming of these cues. The author applies the computational model to three findings that have been used to argue about how many items can be held in the focus of attention (Oberauer and Bialkova, 2009; Gilchrist and Cowan, 2011; Oberauer and Bialkova, 2011). The modeling results imply a new interpretation of those findings: The different patterns of results across those studies don't imply different capacity estimates for the focus of attention; they rather reflect to what extent retrieval from WM is parallel or serial.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3797978
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37979782013-10-21 The focus of attention in working memory—from metaphors to mechanisms Oberauer, Klaus Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Many verbal theories describe working memory (WM) in terms of physical metaphors such as information flow or information containers. These metaphors are often useful but can also be misleading. This article contrasts the verbal version of the author's three-embedded-component theory with a computational implementation of the theory. The analysis focuses on phenomena that have been attributed to the focus of attention in WM. The verbal theory characterizes the focus of attention by a container metaphor, which gives rise to questions such as: how many items fit into the focus? The computational model explains the same phenomena mechanistically through a combination of strengthened bindings between items and their retrieval cues, and priming of these cues. The author applies the computational model to three findings that have been used to argue about how many items can be held in the focus of attention (Oberauer and Bialkova, 2009; Gilchrist and Cowan, 2011; Oberauer and Bialkova, 2011). The modeling results imply a new interpretation of those findings: The different patterns of results across those studies don't imply different capacity estimates for the focus of attention; they rather reflect to what extent retrieval from WM is parallel or serial. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3797978/ /pubmed/24146644 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00673 Text en Copyright © 2013 Oberauer. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Oberauer, Klaus
The focus of attention in working memory—from metaphors to mechanisms
title The focus of attention in working memory—from metaphors to mechanisms
title_full The focus of attention in working memory—from metaphors to mechanisms
title_fullStr The focus of attention in working memory—from metaphors to mechanisms
title_full_unstemmed The focus of attention in working memory—from metaphors to mechanisms
title_short The focus of attention in working memory—from metaphors to mechanisms
title_sort focus of attention in working memory—from metaphors to mechanisms
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3797978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24146644
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00673
work_keys_str_mv AT oberauerklaus thefocusofattentioninworkingmemoryfrommetaphorstomechanisms
AT oberauerklaus focusofattentioninworkingmemoryfrommetaphorstomechanisms