Cargando…
The focus of attention in working memory—from metaphors to mechanisms
Many verbal theories describe working memory (WM) in terms of physical metaphors such as information flow or information containers. These metaphors are often useful but can also be misleading. This article contrasts the verbal version of the author's three-embedded-component theory with a comp...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3797978/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24146644 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00673 |
_version_ | 1782287700760461312 |
---|---|
author | Oberauer, Klaus |
author_facet | Oberauer, Klaus |
author_sort | Oberauer, Klaus |
collection | PubMed |
description | Many verbal theories describe working memory (WM) in terms of physical metaphors such as information flow or information containers. These metaphors are often useful but can also be misleading. This article contrasts the verbal version of the author's three-embedded-component theory with a computational implementation of the theory. The analysis focuses on phenomena that have been attributed to the focus of attention in WM. The verbal theory characterizes the focus of attention by a container metaphor, which gives rise to questions such as: how many items fit into the focus? The computational model explains the same phenomena mechanistically through a combination of strengthened bindings between items and their retrieval cues, and priming of these cues. The author applies the computational model to three findings that have been used to argue about how many items can be held in the focus of attention (Oberauer and Bialkova, 2009; Gilchrist and Cowan, 2011; Oberauer and Bialkova, 2011). The modeling results imply a new interpretation of those findings: The different patterns of results across those studies don't imply different capacity estimates for the focus of attention; they rather reflect to what extent retrieval from WM is parallel or serial. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3797978 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37979782013-10-21 The focus of attention in working memory—from metaphors to mechanisms Oberauer, Klaus Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Many verbal theories describe working memory (WM) in terms of physical metaphors such as information flow or information containers. These metaphors are often useful but can also be misleading. This article contrasts the verbal version of the author's three-embedded-component theory with a computational implementation of the theory. The analysis focuses on phenomena that have been attributed to the focus of attention in WM. The verbal theory characterizes the focus of attention by a container metaphor, which gives rise to questions such as: how many items fit into the focus? The computational model explains the same phenomena mechanistically through a combination of strengthened bindings between items and their retrieval cues, and priming of these cues. The author applies the computational model to three findings that have been used to argue about how many items can be held in the focus of attention (Oberauer and Bialkova, 2009; Gilchrist and Cowan, 2011; Oberauer and Bialkova, 2011). The modeling results imply a new interpretation of those findings: The different patterns of results across those studies don't imply different capacity estimates for the focus of attention; they rather reflect to what extent retrieval from WM is parallel or serial. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3797978/ /pubmed/24146644 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00673 Text en Copyright © 2013 Oberauer. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Oberauer, Klaus The focus of attention in working memory—from metaphors to mechanisms |
title | The focus of attention in working memory—from metaphors to mechanisms |
title_full | The focus of attention in working memory—from metaphors to mechanisms |
title_fullStr | The focus of attention in working memory—from metaphors to mechanisms |
title_full_unstemmed | The focus of attention in working memory—from metaphors to mechanisms |
title_short | The focus of attention in working memory—from metaphors to mechanisms |
title_sort | focus of attention in working memory—from metaphors to mechanisms |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3797978/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24146644 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00673 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oberauerklaus thefocusofattentioninworkingmemoryfrommetaphorstomechanisms AT oberauerklaus focusofattentioninworkingmemoryfrommetaphorstomechanisms |