Cargando…
The influence of background diabetic retinopathy in the second eye on rates of progression of diabetic retinopathy between 2005 and 2010
Purpose: The Gloucestershire Diabetic Eye Screening Programme offers annual digital photographic screening for diabetic retinopathy to a countywide population of people with diabetes. This study was designed to investigate progression of diabetic retinopathy in this programme of the English NHS Diab...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3798105/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23551550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aos.12074 |
_version_ | 1782287714462203904 |
---|---|
author | Scanlon, Peter H Stratton, Irene M Histed, Mark Chave, Steve J Aldington, Stephen J |
author_facet | Scanlon, Peter H Stratton, Irene M Histed, Mark Chave, Steve J Aldington, Stephen J |
author_sort | Scanlon, Peter H |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose: The Gloucestershire Diabetic Eye Screening Programme offers annual digital photographic screening for diabetic retinopathy to a countywide population of people with diabetes. This study was designed to investigate progression of diabetic retinopathy in this programme of the English NHS Diabetic Eye Screening Programme. Methods: Mydriatic digital retinal photographs of people with diabetes screened on at least 2 occasions between 2005 and 2010 were graded and included in this study if the classification at first screening was no DR (R0), background DR in one (R1a) or both eyes (R1b). Times to detection of referable diabetic retinopathy (RDR) comprising maculopathy (M1), preproliferative (R2) or proliferative retinopathy (R3) were analysed using survival models. Results: Data were available on 19 044 patients, 56% men, age at screening 66 (57–74) years (median, 25th, 75th centile). A total of 8.3% of those with R1a and 28.2% of those with R1b progressed to any RDR, hazard ratios 2.9 [2.5–3.3] and 11.3 [10.0–12.8]. Similarly 7.1% and 0.11% of those with R1a progressed to M1 and R3, hazard ratios 2.7 [2.3–3.2] and 1.6 [0.5–5.0], compared to 21.8% and 1.07% of those with R1b, hazard ratio 9.1 [7.8–10.4] and 15.0 [7.1–31.5]. Conclusions: The risk of progression is significantly higher for those with background DR in both eyes than those with background retinopathy in only one or in neither eye. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3798105 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37981052013-10-22 The influence of background diabetic retinopathy in the second eye on rates of progression of diabetic retinopathy between 2005 and 2010 Scanlon, Peter H Stratton, Irene M Histed, Mark Chave, Steve J Aldington, Stephen J Acta Ophthalmol Original Articles Purpose: The Gloucestershire Diabetic Eye Screening Programme offers annual digital photographic screening for diabetic retinopathy to a countywide population of people with diabetes. This study was designed to investigate progression of diabetic retinopathy in this programme of the English NHS Diabetic Eye Screening Programme. Methods: Mydriatic digital retinal photographs of people with diabetes screened on at least 2 occasions between 2005 and 2010 were graded and included in this study if the classification at first screening was no DR (R0), background DR in one (R1a) or both eyes (R1b). Times to detection of referable diabetic retinopathy (RDR) comprising maculopathy (M1), preproliferative (R2) or proliferative retinopathy (R3) were analysed using survival models. Results: Data were available on 19 044 patients, 56% men, age at screening 66 (57–74) years (median, 25th, 75th centile). A total of 8.3% of those with R1a and 28.2% of those with R1b progressed to any RDR, hazard ratios 2.9 [2.5–3.3] and 11.3 [10.0–12.8]. Similarly 7.1% and 0.11% of those with R1a progressed to M1 and R3, hazard ratios 2.7 [2.3–3.2] and 1.6 [0.5–5.0], compared to 21.8% and 1.07% of those with R1b, hazard ratio 9.1 [7.8–10.4] and 15.0 [7.1–31.5]. Conclusions: The risk of progression is significantly higher for those with background DR in both eyes than those with background retinopathy in only one or in neither eye. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2013-08 2013-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3798105/ /pubmed/23551550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aos.12074 Text en © 2013 The Authors Acta Ophthalmologica © 2013 Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Scanlon, Peter H Stratton, Irene M Histed, Mark Chave, Steve J Aldington, Stephen J The influence of background diabetic retinopathy in the second eye on rates of progression of diabetic retinopathy between 2005 and 2010 |
title | The influence of background diabetic retinopathy in the second eye on rates of progression of diabetic retinopathy between 2005 and 2010 |
title_full | The influence of background diabetic retinopathy in the second eye on rates of progression of diabetic retinopathy between 2005 and 2010 |
title_fullStr | The influence of background diabetic retinopathy in the second eye on rates of progression of diabetic retinopathy between 2005 and 2010 |
title_full_unstemmed | The influence of background diabetic retinopathy in the second eye on rates of progression of diabetic retinopathy between 2005 and 2010 |
title_short | The influence of background diabetic retinopathy in the second eye on rates of progression of diabetic retinopathy between 2005 and 2010 |
title_sort | influence of background diabetic retinopathy in the second eye on rates of progression of diabetic retinopathy between 2005 and 2010 |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3798105/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23551550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aos.12074 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT scanlonpeterh theinfluenceofbackgrounddiabeticretinopathyinthesecondeyeonratesofprogressionofdiabeticretinopathybetween2005and2010 AT strattonirenem theinfluenceofbackgrounddiabeticretinopathyinthesecondeyeonratesofprogressionofdiabeticretinopathybetween2005and2010 AT histedmark theinfluenceofbackgrounddiabeticretinopathyinthesecondeyeonratesofprogressionofdiabeticretinopathybetween2005and2010 AT chavestevej theinfluenceofbackgrounddiabeticretinopathyinthesecondeyeonratesofprogressionofdiabeticretinopathybetween2005and2010 AT aldingtonstephenj theinfluenceofbackgrounddiabeticretinopathyinthesecondeyeonratesofprogressionofdiabeticretinopathybetween2005and2010 AT scanlonpeterh influenceofbackgrounddiabeticretinopathyinthesecondeyeonratesofprogressionofdiabeticretinopathybetween2005and2010 AT strattonirenem influenceofbackgrounddiabeticretinopathyinthesecondeyeonratesofprogressionofdiabeticretinopathybetween2005and2010 AT histedmark influenceofbackgrounddiabeticretinopathyinthesecondeyeonratesofprogressionofdiabeticretinopathybetween2005and2010 AT chavestevej influenceofbackgrounddiabeticretinopathyinthesecondeyeonratesofprogressionofdiabeticretinopathybetween2005and2010 AT aldingtonstephenj influenceofbackgrounddiabeticretinopathyinthesecondeyeonratesofprogressionofdiabeticretinopathybetween2005and2010 |