Cargando…
Comparison of Two Internet-Based Interventions for Problem Drinkers: Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND: Alcohol problems are a serious public health concern, and few problem drinkers ever seek treatment. The Internet is one means of promoting access to care, but more research is needed to test the best types of interventions to employ. Evaluation of Internet-based interventions that contai...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Gunther Eysenbach
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3799611/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22954459 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2090 |
_version_ | 1782287900447080448 |
---|---|
author | Cunningham, John Alastair |
author_facet | Cunningham, John Alastair |
author_sort | Cunningham, John Alastair |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Alcohol problems are a serious public health concern, and few problem drinkers ever seek treatment. The Internet is one means of promoting access to care, but more research is needed to test the best types of interventions to employ. Evaluation of Internet-based interventions that contain a variety of research-validated cognitive-behavioral tools, which have been shown to be helpful to those with more severe alcohol concerns, should be a priority. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether providing access to an extended Internet intervention for alcohol problems offers additional benefits in promoting reductions in alcohol consumption compared with a brief Internet intervention. The hypothesis for the current trial was that respondents who were provided with access to an extended Internet intervention (the Alcohol Help Center [AHC]) would display significantly improved drinking outcomes at 6-month follow-up, compared with respondents who were provided with access to a brief Internet intervention (the Check Your Drinking [CYD] screener). METHODS: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial with a 6-month follow-up. A general population sample of problem drinkers was recruited through newspaper advertisements in a large metropolitan city. Baseline and follow-up data were collected by postal mail. RESULTS: A volunteer sample of problem drinkers of legal drinking age with home access to the Internet were recruited for the trial. Of 239 potential respondents recruited in 2010, 170 met inclusion criteria (average age 45 years; 101/170, 59.4% male; average Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test [AUDIT] score of 22). Follow-up rates were 90.0% (153/170) with no adverse effects of the interventions reported. A repeated-measures multivariate analysis of variance of the outcome measures using an intent-to-treat approach found a significantly greater reduction in amount of drinking among participants provided access to the AHC than among participants provided access to the CYD (P = .046). CONCLUSIONS: The provision of the AHC gave additional benefit in the short term to problem drinkers over that seen from the research-validated CYD, indicating the benefits of promoting access to these interventions as one means of helping people with problem drinking concerns. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01114919; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01114919 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/68t1dCkRZ) |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3799611 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Gunther Eysenbach |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37996112013-10-22 Comparison of Two Internet-Based Interventions for Problem Drinkers: Randomized Controlled Trial Cunningham, John Alastair J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Alcohol problems are a serious public health concern, and few problem drinkers ever seek treatment. The Internet is one means of promoting access to care, but more research is needed to test the best types of interventions to employ. Evaluation of Internet-based interventions that contain a variety of research-validated cognitive-behavioral tools, which have been shown to be helpful to those with more severe alcohol concerns, should be a priority. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether providing access to an extended Internet intervention for alcohol problems offers additional benefits in promoting reductions in alcohol consumption compared with a brief Internet intervention. The hypothesis for the current trial was that respondents who were provided with access to an extended Internet intervention (the Alcohol Help Center [AHC]) would display significantly improved drinking outcomes at 6-month follow-up, compared with respondents who were provided with access to a brief Internet intervention (the Check Your Drinking [CYD] screener). METHODS: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial with a 6-month follow-up. A general population sample of problem drinkers was recruited through newspaper advertisements in a large metropolitan city. Baseline and follow-up data were collected by postal mail. RESULTS: A volunteer sample of problem drinkers of legal drinking age with home access to the Internet were recruited for the trial. Of 239 potential respondents recruited in 2010, 170 met inclusion criteria (average age 45 years; 101/170, 59.4% male; average Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test [AUDIT] score of 22). Follow-up rates were 90.0% (153/170) with no adverse effects of the interventions reported. A repeated-measures multivariate analysis of variance of the outcome measures using an intent-to-treat approach found a significantly greater reduction in amount of drinking among participants provided access to the AHC than among participants provided access to the CYD (P = .046). CONCLUSIONS: The provision of the AHC gave additional benefit in the short term to problem drinkers over that seen from the research-validated CYD, indicating the benefits of promoting access to these interventions as one means of helping people with problem drinking concerns. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01114919; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01114919 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/68t1dCkRZ) Gunther Eysenbach 2012-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3799611/ /pubmed/22954459 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2090 Text en ©John Alastair Cunningham. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 01.08.2012. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Cunningham, John Alastair Comparison of Two Internet-Based Interventions for Problem Drinkers: Randomized Controlled Trial |
title | Comparison of Two Internet-Based Interventions for Problem Drinkers: Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full | Comparison of Two Internet-Based Interventions for Problem Drinkers: Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Two Internet-Based Interventions for Problem Drinkers: Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Two Internet-Based Interventions for Problem Drinkers: Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_short | Comparison of Two Internet-Based Interventions for Problem Drinkers: Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_sort | comparison of two internet-based interventions for problem drinkers: randomized controlled trial |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3799611/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22954459 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2090 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cunninghamjohnalastair comparisonoftwointernetbasedinterventionsforproblemdrinkersrandomizedcontrolledtrial |