Cargando…

Comparison of Two Internet-Based Interventions for Problem Drinkers: Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: Alcohol problems are a serious public health concern, and few problem drinkers ever seek treatment. The Internet is one means of promoting access to care, but more research is needed to test the best types of interventions to employ. Evaluation of Internet-based interventions that contai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Cunningham, John Alastair
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Gunther Eysenbach 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3799611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22954459
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2090
_version_ 1782287900447080448
author Cunningham, John Alastair
author_facet Cunningham, John Alastair
author_sort Cunningham, John Alastair
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Alcohol problems are a serious public health concern, and few problem drinkers ever seek treatment. The Internet is one means of promoting access to care, but more research is needed to test the best types of interventions to employ. Evaluation of Internet-based interventions that contain a variety of research-validated cognitive-behavioral tools, which have been shown to be helpful to those with more severe alcohol concerns, should be a priority. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether providing access to an extended Internet intervention for alcohol problems offers additional benefits in promoting reductions in alcohol consumption compared with a brief Internet intervention. The hypothesis for the current trial was that respondents who were provided with access to an extended Internet intervention (the Alcohol Help Center [AHC]) would display significantly improved drinking outcomes at 6-month follow-up, compared with respondents who were provided with access to a brief Internet intervention (the Check Your Drinking [CYD] screener). METHODS: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial with a 6-month follow-up. A general population sample of problem drinkers was recruited through newspaper advertisements in a large metropolitan city. Baseline and follow-up data were collected by postal mail. RESULTS: A volunteer sample of problem drinkers of legal drinking age with home access to the Internet were recruited for the trial. Of 239 potential respondents recruited in 2010, 170 met inclusion criteria (average age 45 years; 101/170, 59.4% male; average Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test [AUDIT] score of 22). Follow-up rates were 90.0% (153/170) with no adverse effects of the interventions reported. A repeated-measures multivariate analysis of variance of the outcome measures using an intent-to-treat approach found a significantly greater reduction in amount of drinking among participants provided access to the AHC than among participants provided access to the CYD (P = .046). CONCLUSIONS: The provision of the AHC gave additional benefit in the short term to problem drinkers over that seen from the research-validated CYD, indicating the benefits of promoting access to these interventions as one means of helping people with problem drinking concerns. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01114919; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01114919 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/68t1dCkRZ)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3799611
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Gunther Eysenbach
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37996112013-10-22 Comparison of Two Internet-Based Interventions for Problem Drinkers: Randomized Controlled Trial Cunningham, John Alastair J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Alcohol problems are a serious public health concern, and few problem drinkers ever seek treatment. The Internet is one means of promoting access to care, but more research is needed to test the best types of interventions to employ. Evaluation of Internet-based interventions that contain a variety of research-validated cognitive-behavioral tools, which have been shown to be helpful to those with more severe alcohol concerns, should be a priority. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether providing access to an extended Internet intervention for alcohol problems offers additional benefits in promoting reductions in alcohol consumption compared with a brief Internet intervention. The hypothesis for the current trial was that respondents who were provided with access to an extended Internet intervention (the Alcohol Help Center [AHC]) would display significantly improved drinking outcomes at 6-month follow-up, compared with respondents who were provided with access to a brief Internet intervention (the Check Your Drinking [CYD] screener). METHODS: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial with a 6-month follow-up. A general population sample of problem drinkers was recruited through newspaper advertisements in a large metropolitan city. Baseline and follow-up data were collected by postal mail. RESULTS: A volunteer sample of problem drinkers of legal drinking age with home access to the Internet were recruited for the trial. Of 239 potential respondents recruited in 2010, 170 met inclusion criteria (average age 45 years; 101/170, 59.4% male; average Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test [AUDIT] score of 22). Follow-up rates were 90.0% (153/170) with no adverse effects of the interventions reported. A repeated-measures multivariate analysis of variance of the outcome measures using an intent-to-treat approach found a significantly greater reduction in amount of drinking among participants provided access to the AHC than among participants provided access to the CYD (P = .046). CONCLUSIONS: The provision of the AHC gave additional benefit in the short term to problem drinkers over that seen from the research-validated CYD, indicating the benefits of promoting access to these interventions as one means of helping people with problem drinking concerns. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01114919; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01114919 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/68t1dCkRZ) Gunther Eysenbach 2012-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3799611/ /pubmed/22954459 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2090 Text en ©John Alastair Cunningham. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 01.08.2012. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Cunningham, John Alastair
Comparison of Two Internet-Based Interventions for Problem Drinkers: Randomized Controlled Trial
title Comparison of Two Internet-Based Interventions for Problem Drinkers: Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Comparison of Two Internet-Based Interventions for Problem Drinkers: Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Comparison of Two Internet-Based Interventions for Problem Drinkers: Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Two Internet-Based Interventions for Problem Drinkers: Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Comparison of Two Internet-Based Interventions for Problem Drinkers: Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort comparison of two internet-based interventions for problem drinkers: randomized controlled trial
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3799611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22954459
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2090
work_keys_str_mv AT cunninghamjohnalastair comparisonoftwointernetbasedinterventionsforproblemdrinkersrandomizedcontrolledtrial