Cargando…

An Ounce of Discretion Is Worth a Pound of Wit — Ergonomics Is a Healthy Choice

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to identify the occurrence and outcome of low back ache amongst computer users and their relation to age, gender, occupation and duration of computer use. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A self reported questionnaire tailored from Occupational Health and Safety Act o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rehman, Rehana, Khan, Rakhshaan, Surti, Ambreen, Khan, Hira
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3799755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24204559
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071891
_version_ 1782287921708007424
author Rehman, Rehana
Khan, Rakhshaan
Surti, Ambreen
Khan, Hira
author_facet Rehman, Rehana
Khan, Rakhshaan
Surti, Ambreen
Khan, Hira
author_sort Rehman, Rehana
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to identify the occurrence and outcome of low back ache amongst computer users and their relation to age, gender, occupation and duration of computer use. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A self reported questionnaire tailored from Occupational Health and Safety Act of the Ministry of Labor, Ontario, Canada was used. RESULTS: 416 participants 55.5% males and 45% females using computers for a minimum of five years with age range 22 to 59 years belonged to different occupational groups. Consecutive hours of computer work was found to be associated with work related backache or discomfort in 27.4% (n = 114) participants (16.1% male, 11.3% female). Frequent short breaks improved backache (p value <0.001) in 93 (22.4%) participants (13.2% male, 9.2% female). No significant relation was observed with the duration of computer usage or usage per day; between the two genders or occupational groups. Backache had no significance within age groups. CONCLUSION: Our study identifies the occurrence of low back pain among those who are using computer for consecutive hours without breaks and the results suggest the need to create health awareness especially use of short breaks to minimize the risk and occurrence of low back pain. The result of this study can also be used to improve ergonomic design and standards.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3799755
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37997552013-11-07 An Ounce of Discretion Is Worth a Pound of Wit — Ergonomics Is a Healthy Choice Rehman, Rehana Khan, Rakhshaan Surti, Ambreen Khan, Hira PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to identify the occurrence and outcome of low back ache amongst computer users and their relation to age, gender, occupation and duration of computer use. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A self reported questionnaire tailored from Occupational Health and Safety Act of the Ministry of Labor, Ontario, Canada was used. RESULTS: 416 participants 55.5% males and 45% females using computers for a minimum of five years with age range 22 to 59 years belonged to different occupational groups. Consecutive hours of computer work was found to be associated with work related backache or discomfort in 27.4% (n = 114) participants (16.1% male, 11.3% female). Frequent short breaks improved backache (p value <0.001) in 93 (22.4%) participants (13.2% male, 9.2% female). No significant relation was observed with the duration of computer usage or usage per day; between the two genders or occupational groups. Backache had no significance within age groups. CONCLUSION: Our study identifies the occurrence of low back pain among those who are using computer for consecutive hours without breaks and the results suggest the need to create health awareness especially use of short breaks to minimize the risk and occurrence of low back pain. The result of this study can also be used to improve ergonomic design and standards. Public Library of Science 2013-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3799755/ /pubmed/24204559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071891 Text en © 2013 Rehman et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rehman, Rehana
Khan, Rakhshaan
Surti, Ambreen
Khan, Hira
An Ounce of Discretion Is Worth a Pound of Wit — Ergonomics Is a Healthy Choice
title An Ounce of Discretion Is Worth a Pound of Wit — Ergonomics Is a Healthy Choice
title_full An Ounce of Discretion Is Worth a Pound of Wit — Ergonomics Is a Healthy Choice
title_fullStr An Ounce of Discretion Is Worth a Pound of Wit — Ergonomics Is a Healthy Choice
title_full_unstemmed An Ounce of Discretion Is Worth a Pound of Wit — Ergonomics Is a Healthy Choice
title_short An Ounce of Discretion Is Worth a Pound of Wit — Ergonomics Is a Healthy Choice
title_sort ounce of discretion is worth a pound of wit — ergonomics is a healthy choice
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3799755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24204559
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071891
work_keys_str_mv AT rehmanrehana anounceofdiscretionisworthapoundofwitergonomicsisahealthychoice
AT khanrakhshaan anounceofdiscretionisworthapoundofwitergonomicsisahealthychoice
AT surtiambreen anounceofdiscretionisworthapoundofwitergonomicsisahealthychoice
AT khanhira anounceofdiscretionisworthapoundofwitergonomicsisahealthychoice
AT rehmanrehana ounceofdiscretionisworthapoundofwitergonomicsisahealthychoice
AT khanrakhshaan ounceofdiscretionisworthapoundofwitergonomicsisahealthychoice
AT surtiambreen ounceofdiscretionisworthapoundofwitergonomicsisahealthychoice
AT khanhira ounceofdiscretionisworthapoundofwitergonomicsisahealthychoice