Cargando…

A comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of guided tissue regeneration by using a collagen membrane with or without decalcified freeze-dried bone allograft in the treatment of infrabony defects: A clinical and radiographic study

BACKGROUND: The present, randomized, controlled clinical and radiographic study was undertaken to compare the effectiveness of guided tissue regeneration (GTR) by using a collagen membrane barrier with or without decalcified freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) in the treatment of periodontal infrabo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kher, Vishal Kiran, Bhongade, Manohar L., Shori, Tony D., Kolte, Abhay P., Dharamthok, Swarup B., Shrirao, Tushar S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3800412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24174729
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-124X.118321
_version_ 1782287978380394496
author Kher, Vishal Kiran
Bhongade, Manohar L.
Shori, Tony D.
Kolte, Abhay P.
Dharamthok, Swarup B.
Shrirao, Tushar S.
author_facet Kher, Vishal Kiran
Bhongade, Manohar L.
Shori, Tony D.
Kolte, Abhay P.
Dharamthok, Swarup B.
Shrirao, Tushar S.
author_sort Kher, Vishal Kiran
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The present, randomized, controlled clinical and radiographic study was undertaken to compare the effectiveness of guided tissue regeneration (GTR) by using a collagen membrane barrier with or without decalcified freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) in the treatment of periodontal infrabony defects characterized by unfavorable architecture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen systemically healthy patients with 20 periodontal infrabony defects were selected for the study. Each patient had at least ≥ 5 mm clinical probing pocket depth (PPD) at the selected site and depth of intrabony component ≥ 3 mm as assessed by clinical and radiographic measurements. Baseline measurements included plaque index, papillary bleeding index, PPD, gingival recession, clinical attachment level and radiographic defect depth (DD). At the time of surgery, the defects were randomly assigned to either the test group (collagen membrane plus DFDBA) or the control group (collagen membrane only). RESULTS: At the 6-month examination, PPPD reduction was significantly greater in the GTR + DFDBA group (4.06 ± 0.38 mm) compared with the GTR group (3.2 ± 0.74 mm). The mean gains of clinical attachment were 3.54 ± 0.36 mm in the test group and 2.50 ± 0.74 mm in the control group. Radiographic DD reduction was similarly greater in the GTR + DFDBA group (2.40 ± 0.51 mm) compared with the GTR group (1.60 ± 0.51 mm). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study indicate that the use of a GTR membrane with bone graft has significantly improved all clinical parameters tested as compared with the use of bioresorbable membrane alone in the treatment of infrabony defects characterized by unfavorable architecture.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3800412
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38004122013-10-30 A comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of guided tissue regeneration by using a collagen membrane with or without decalcified freeze-dried bone allograft in the treatment of infrabony defects: A clinical and radiographic study Kher, Vishal Kiran Bhongade, Manohar L. Shori, Tony D. Kolte, Abhay P. Dharamthok, Swarup B. Shrirao, Tushar S. J Indian Soc Periodontol Original Article BACKGROUND: The present, randomized, controlled clinical and radiographic study was undertaken to compare the effectiveness of guided tissue regeneration (GTR) by using a collagen membrane barrier with or without decalcified freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) in the treatment of periodontal infrabony defects characterized by unfavorable architecture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen systemically healthy patients with 20 periodontal infrabony defects were selected for the study. Each patient had at least ≥ 5 mm clinical probing pocket depth (PPD) at the selected site and depth of intrabony component ≥ 3 mm as assessed by clinical and radiographic measurements. Baseline measurements included plaque index, papillary bleeding index, PPD, gingival recession, clinical attachment level and radiographic defect depth (DD). At the time of surgery, the defects were randomly assigned to either the test group (collagen membrane plus DFDBA) or the control group (collagen membrane only). RESULTS: At the 6-month examination, PPPD reduction was significantly greater in the GTR + DFDBA group (4.06 ± 0.38 mm) compared with the GTR group (3.2 ± 0.74 mm). The mean gains of clinical attachment were 3.54 ± 0.36 mm in the test group and 2.50 ± 0.74 mm in the control group. Radiographic DD reduction was similarly greater in the GTR + DFDBA group (2.40 ± 0.51 mm) compared with the GTR group (1.60 ± 0.51 mm). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study indicate that the use of a GTR membrane with bone graft has significantly improved all clinical parameters tested as compared with the use of bioresorbable membrane alone in the treatment of infrabony defects characterized by unfavorable architecture. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3800412/ /pubmed/24174729 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-124X.118321 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kher, Vishal Kiran
Bhongade, Manohar L.
Shori, Tony D.
Kolte, Abhay P.
Dharamthok, Swarup B.
Shrirao, Tushar S.
A comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of guided tissue regeneration by using a collagen membrane with or without decalcified freeze-dried bone allograft in the treatment of infrabony defects: A clinical and radiographic study
title A comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of guided tissue regeneration by using a collagen membrane with or without decalcified freeze-dried bone allograft in the treatment of infrabony defects: A clinical and radiographic study
title_full A comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of guided tissue regeneration by using a collagen membrane with or without decalcified freeze-dried bone allograft in the treatment of infrabony defects: A clinical and radiographic study
title_fullStr A comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of guided tissue regeneration by using a collagen membrane with or without decalcified freeze-dried bone allograft in the treatment of infrabony defects: A clinical and radiographic study
title_full_unstemmed A comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of guided tissue regeneration by using a collagen membrane with or without decalcified freeze-dried bone allograft in the treatment of infrabony defects: A clinical and radiographic study
title_short A comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of guided tissue regeneration by using a collagen membrane with or without decalcified freeze-dried bone allograft in the treatment of infrabony defects: A clinical and radiographic study
title_sort comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of guided tissue regeneration by using a collagen membrane with or without decalcified freeze-dried bone allograft in the treatment of infrabony defects: a clinical and radiographic study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3800412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24174729
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-124X.118321
work_keys_str_mv AT khervishalkiran acomparativeevaluationoftheeffectivenessofguidedtissueregenerationbyusingacollagenmembranewithorwithoutdecalcifiedfreezedriedboneallograftinthetreatmentofinfrabonydefectsaclinicalandradiographicstudy
AT bhongademanoharl acomparativeevaluationoftheeffectivenessofguidedtissueregenerationbyusingacollagenmembranewithorwithoutdecalcifiedfreezedriedboneallograftinthetreatmentofinfrabonydefectsaclinicalandradiographicstudy
AT shoritonyd acomparativeevaluationoftheeffectivenessofguidedtissueregenerationbyusingacollagenmembranewithorwithoutdecalcifiedfreezedriedboneallograftinthetreatmentofinfrabonydefectsaclinicalandradiographicstudy
AT kolteabhayp acomparativeevaluationoftheeffectivenessofguidedtissueregenerationbyusingacollagenmembranewithorwithoutdecalcifiedfreezedriedboneallograftinthetreatmentofinfrabonydefectsaclinicalandradiographicstudy
AT dharamthokswarupb acomparativeevaluationoftheeffectivenessofguidedtissueregenerationbyusingacollagenmembranewithorwithoutdecalcifiedfreezedriedboneallograftinthetreatmentofinfrabonydefectsaclinicalandradiographicstudy
AT shriraotushars acomparativeevaluationoftheeffectivenessofguidedtissueregenerationbyusingacollagenmembranewithorwithoutdecalcifiedfreezedriedboneallograftinthetreatmentofinfrabonydefectsaclinicalandradiographicstudy
AT khervishalkiran comparativeevaluationoftheeffectivenessofguidedtissueregenerationbyusingacollagenmembranewithorwithoutdecalcifiedfreezedriedboneallograftinthetreatmentofinfrabonydefectsaclinicalandradiographicstudy
AT bhongademanoharl comparativeevaluationoftheeffectivenessofguidedtissueregenerationbyusingacollagenmembranewithorwithoutdecalcifiedfreezedriedboneallograftinthetreatmentofinfrabonydefectsaclinicalandradiographicstudy
AT shoritonyd comparativeevaluationoftheeffectivenessofguidedtissueregenerationbyusingacollagenmembranewithorwithoutdecalcifiedfreezedriedboneallograftinthetreatmentofinfrabonydefectsaclinicalandradiographicstudy
AT kolteabhayp comparativeevaluationoftheeffectivenessofguidedtissueregenerationbyusingacollagenmembranewithorwithoutdecalcifiedfreezedriedboneallograftinthetreatmentofinfrabonydefectsaclinicalandradiographicstudy
AT dharamthokswarupb comparativeevaluationoftheeffectivenessofguidedtissueregenerationbyusingacollagenmembranewithorwithoutdecalcifiedfreezedriedboneallograftinthetreatmentofinfrabonydefectsaclinicalandradiographicstudy
AT shriraotushars comparativeevaluationoftheeffectivenessofguidedtissueregenerationbyusingacollagenmembranewithorwithoutdecalcifiedfreezedriedboneallograftinthetreatmentofinfrabonydefectsaclinicalandradiographicstudy