Cargando…

Clinical and radiographic evaluation of demineralized bone matrix (grafton) as a bone graft material in the treatment of human periodontal intraosseous defects

PURPOSE: The purpose of this clinical trial was to evaluate the efficacy of demineralized bone matrix (DBM) as a bone graft material in the treatment of human intrabony periodontal defects as compared with control defects treated by open flap debridement (OFD) alone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A control...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mahantesha, Shobha, K. S., Mani, R., Deshpande, Amritha, Seshan, Hema, Kranti, K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3800414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24174731
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-124X.118323
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: The purpose of this clinical trial was to evaluate the efficacy of demineralized bone matrix (DBM) as a bone graft material in the treatment of human intrabony periodontal defects as compared with control defects treated by open flap debridement (OFD) alone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A controlled clinical trial was carried out for a period of 9 months in 11 patients (4 males and 7 females) with an age group of 25-50 years, contributing to a total of 30 defects. The selected defects were then randomly divided in to experimental sites (OFD + DBM) and control sites (OFD alone). Probing depth, clinical attachment levels and position of the gingival margin were recorded at baseline 3, 6 and 9 months post-operatively. Standardized radiographs (parallel technique) were also documented at these recall intervals. RESULTS: On completion of 9 months, the mean percentage of probing depth reduction achieved in the experimental sites and control sites was 61.70%, 23.86% respectively. The mean percentage of clinical attachment level gain was 61.34% and 19.37% in the experimental and control sites respectively. In the experimental sites recession was observed to a lesser extent. CONCLUSION: The use of DBM was more effective than OFD in improving clinical parameters and radiographic bone fill as shown in the present study. However, there is a need for further long term studies.