Cargando…

Genetic analysis of reaction time variability: room for improvement?

BACKGROUND: Increased reaction time variability (RTV) on cognitive tasks requiring a speeded response is characteristic of several psychiatric disorders. In attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), the association with RTV is strong phenotypically and genetically, yet high RTV is not a stabl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kuntsi, J., Frazier-Wood, A. C., Banaschewski, T., Gill, M., Miranda, A., Oades, R. D., Roeyers, H., Rothenberger, A., Steinhausen, H.-C., van der Meere, J. J., Faraone, S. V., Asherson, P., Rijsdijk, F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3801159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22975296
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291712002061
_version_ 1782288082490359808
author Kuntsi, J.
Frazier-Wood, A. C.
Banaschewski, T.
Gill, M.
Miranda, A.
Oades, R. D.
Roeyers, H.
Rothenberger, A.
Steinhausen, H.-C.
van der Meere, J. J.
Faraone, S. V.
Asherson, P.
Rijsdijk, F.
author_facet Kuntsi, J.
Frazier-Wood, A. C.
Banaschewski, T.
Gill, M.
Miranda, A.
Oades, R. D.
Roeyers, H.
Rothenberger, A.
Steinhausen, H.-C.
van der Meere, J. J.
Faraone, S. V.
Asherson, P.
Rijsdijk, F.
author_sort Kuntsi, J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Increased reaction time variability (RTV) on cognitive tasks requiring a speeded response is characteristic of several psychiatric disorders. In attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), the association with RTV is strong phenotypically and genetically, yet high RTV is not a stable impairment but shows ADHD-sensitive improvement under certain conditions, such as those with rewards. The state regulation theory proposed that the RTV difference score, which captures change from baseline to a rewarded or fast condition, specifically measures ‘state regulation’. By contrast, the interpretation of RTV baseline (slow, unrewarded) scores is debated. We aimed to investigate directly the degree of phenotypic and etiological overlap between RTV baseline and RTV difference scores. METHOD: We conducted genetic model fitting analyses on go/no-go and fast task RTV data, across task conditions manipulating rewards and event rate, from a population-based twin sample (n=1314) and an ADHD and control sibling-pair sample (n=1265). RESULTS: Phenotypic and genetic/familial correlations were consistently high (0.72–0.98) between RTV baseline and difference scores, across tasks, manipulations and samples. By contrast, correlations were low between RTV in the manipulated condition and difference scores. A comparison across two different go/no-go task RTV difference scores (slow-fast/slow-incentive) showed high phenotypic and genetic/familial overlap (r = 0.75–0.83). CONCLUSIONS: Our finding that RTV difference scores measure largely the same etiological process as RTV under baseline condition supports theories emphasizing the malleability of the observed high RTV. Given the statistical shortcomings of difference scores, we recommend the use of RTV baseline scores for most analyses, including genetic analyses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3801159
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38011592013-10-21 Genetic analysis of reaction time variability: room for improvement? Kuntsi, J. Frazier-Wood, A. C. Banaschewski, T. Gill, M. Miranda, A. Oades, R. D. Roeyers, H. Rothenberger, A. Steinhausen, H.-C. van der Meere, J. J. Faraone, S. V. Asherson, P. Rijsdijk, F. Psychol Med Original Articles BACKGROUND: Increased reaction time variability (RTV) on cognitive tasks requiring a speeded response is characteristic of several psychiatric disorders. In attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), the association with RTV is strong phenotypically and genetically, yet high RTV is not a stable impairment but shows ADHD-sensitive improvement under certain conditions, such as those with rewards. The state regulation theory proposed that the RTV difference score, which captures change from baseline to a rewarded or fast condition, specifically measures ‘state regulation’. By contrast, the interpretation of RTV baseline (slow, unrewarded) scores is debated. We aimed to investigate directly the degree of phenotypic and etiological overlap between RTV baseline and RTV difference scores. METHOD: We conducted genetic model fitting analyses on go/no-go and fast task RTV data, across task conditions manipulating rewards and event rate, from a population-based twin sample (n=1314) and an ADHD and control sibling-pair sample (n=1265). RESULTS: Phenotypic and genetic/familial correlations were consistently high (0.72–0.98) between RTV baseline and difference scores, across tasks, manipulations and samples. By contrast, correlations were low between RTV in the manipulated condition and difference scores. A comparison across two different go/no-go task RTV difference scores (slow-fast/slow-incentive) showed high phenotypic and genetic/familial overlap (r = 0.75–0.83). CONCLUSIONS: Our finding that RTV difference scores measure largely the same etiological process as RTV under baseline condition supports theories emphasizing the malleability of the observed high RTV. Given the statistical shortcomings of difference scores, we recommend the use of RTV baseline scores for most analyses, including genetic analyses. Cambridge University Press 2013-06 2012-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3801159/ /pubmed/22975296 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291712002061 Text en © Cambridge University Press 2012 The online version of this article is published within an Open Access environment subject to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
spellingShingle Original Articles
Kuntsi, J.
Frazier-Wood, A. C.
Banaschewski, T.
Gill, M.
Miranda, A.
Oades, R. D.
Roeyers, H.
Rothenberger, A.
Steinhausen, H.-C.
van der Meere, J. J.
Faraone, S. V.
Asherson, P.
Rijsdijk, F.
Genetic analysis of reaction time variability: room for improvement?
title Genetic analysis of reaction time variability: room for improvement?
title_full Genetic analysis of reaction time variability: room for improvement?
title_fullStr Genetic analysis of reaction time variability: room for improvement?
title_full_unstemmed Genetic analysis of reaction time variability: room for improvement?
title_short Genetic analysis of reaction time variability: room for improvement?
title_sort genetic analysis of reaction time variability: room for improvement?
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3801159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22975296
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291712002061
work_keys_str_mv AT kuntsij geneticanalysisofreactiontimevariabilityroomforimprovement
AT frazierwoodac geneticanalysisofreactiontimevariabilityroomforimprovement
AT banaschewskit geneticanalysisofreactiontimevariabilityroomforimprovement
AT gillm geneticanalysisofreactiontimevariabilityroomforimprovement
AT mirandaa geneticanalysisofreactiontimevariabilityroomforimprovement
AT oadesrd geneticanalysisofreactiontimevariabilityroomforimprovement
AT roeyersh geneticanalysisofreactiontimevariabilityroomforimprovement
AT rothenbergera geneticanalysisofreactiontimevariabilityroomforimprovement
AT steinhausenhc geneticanalysisofreactiontimevariabilityroomforimprovement
AT vandermeerejj geneticanalysisofreactiontimevariabilityroomforimprovement
AT faraonesv geneticanalysisofreactiontimevariabilityroomforimprovement
AT ashersonp geneticanalysisofreactiontimevariabilityroomforimprovement
AT rijsdijkf geneticanalysisofreactiontimevariabilityroomforimprovement