Cargando…
Genetic analysis of reaction time variability: room for improvement?
BACKGROUND: Increased reaction time variability (RTV) on cognitive tasks requiring a speeded response is characteristic of several psychiatric disorders. In attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), the association with RTV is strong phenotypically and genetically, yet high RTV is not a stabl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3801159/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22975296 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291712002061 |
_version_ | 1782288082490359808 |
---|---|
author | Kuntsi, J. Frazier-Wood, A. C. Banaschewski, T. Gill, M. Miranda, A. Oades, R. D. Roeyers, H. Rothenberger, A. Steinhausen, H.-C. van der Meere, J. J. Faraone, S. V. Asherson, P. Rijsdijk, F. |
author_facet | Kuntsi, J. Frazier-Wood, A. C. Banaschewski, T. Gill, M. Miranda, A. Oades, R. D. Roeyers, H. Rothenberger, A. Steinhausen, H.-C. van der Meere, J. J. Faraone, S. V. Asherson, P. Rijsdijk, F. |
author_sort | Kuntsi, J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Increased reaction time variability (RTV) on cognitive tasks requiring a speeded response is characteristic of several psychiatric disorders. In attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), the association with RTV is strong phenotypically and genetically, yet high RTV is not a stable impairment but shows ADHD-sensitive improvement under certain conditions, such as those with rewards. The state regulation theory proposed that the RTV difference score, which captures change from baseline to a rewarded or fast condition, specifically measures ‘state regulation’. By contrast, the interpretation of RTV baseline (slow, unrewarded) scores is debated. We aimed to investigate directly the degree of phenotypic and etiological overlap between RTV baseline and RTV difference scores. METHOD: We conducted genetic model fitting analyses on go/no-go and fast task RTV data, across task conditions manipulating rewards and event rate, from a population-based twin sample (n=1314) and an ADHD and control sibling-pair sample (n=1265). RESULTS: Phenotypic and genetic/familial correlations were consistently high (0.72–0.98) between RTV baseline and difference scores, across tasks, manipulations and samples. By contrast, correlations were low between RTV in the manipulated condition and difference scores. A comparison across two different go/no-go task RTV difference scores (slow-fast/slow-incentive) showed high phenotypic and genetic/familial overlap (r = 0.75–0.83). CONCLUSIONS: Our finding that RTV difference scores measure largely the same etiological process as RTV under baseline condition supports theories emphasizing the malleability of the observed high RTV. Given the statistical shortcomings of difference scores, we recommend the use of RTV baseline scores for most analyses, including genetic analyses. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3801159 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38011592013-10-21 Genetic analysis of reaction time variability: room for improvement? Kuntsi, J. Frazier-Wood, A. C. Banaschewski, T. Gill, M. Miranda, A. Oades, R. D. Roeyers, H. Rothenberger, A. Steinhausen, H.-C. van der Meere, J. J. Faraone, S. V. Asherson, P. Rijsdijk, F. Psychol Med Original Articles BACKGROUND: Increased reaction time variability (RTV) on cognitive tasks requiring a speeded response is characteristic of several psychiatric disorders. In attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), the association with RTV is strong phenotypically and genetically, yet high RTV is not a stable impairment but shows ADHD-sensitive improvement under certain conditions, such as those with rewards. The state regulation theory proposed that the RTV difference score, which captures change from baseline to a rewarded or fast condition, specifically measures ‘state regulation’. By contrast, the interpretation of RTV baseline (slow, unrewarded) scores is debated. We aimed to investigate directly the degree of phenotypic and etiological overlap between RTV baseline and RTV difference scores. METHOD: We conducted genetic model fitting analyses on go/no-go and fast task RTV data, across task conditions manipulating rewards and event rate, from a population-based twin sample (n=1314) and an ADHD and control sibling-pair sample (n=1265). RESULTS: Phenotypic and genetic/familial correlations were consistently high (0.72–0.98) between RTV baseline and difference scores, across tasks, manipulations and samples. By contrast, correlations were low between RTV in the manipulated condition and difference scores. A comparison across two different go/no-go task RTV difference scores (slow-fast/slow-incentive) showed high phenotypic and genetic/familial overlap (r = 0.75–0.83). CONCLUSIONS: Our finding that RTV difference scores measure largely the same etiological process as RTV under baseline condition supports theories emphasizing the malleability of the observed high RTV. Given the statistical shortcomings of difference scores, we recommend the use of RTV baseline scores for most analyses, including genetic analyses. Cambridge University Press 2013-06 2012-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3801159/ /pubmed/22975296 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291712002061 Text en © Cambridge University Press 2012 The online version of this article is published within an Open Access environment subject to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Kuntsi, J. Frazier-Wood, A. C. Banaschewski, T. Gill, M. Miranda, A. Oades, R. D. Roeyers, H. Rothenberger, A. Steinhausen, H.-C. van der Meere, J. J. Faraone, S. V. Asherson, P. Rijsdijk, F. Genetic analysis of reaction time variability: room for improvement? |
title | Genetic analysis of reaction time variability: room for improvement? |
title_full | Genetic analysis of reaction time variability: room for improvement? |
title_fullStr | Genetic analysis of reaction time variability: room for improvement? |
title_full_unstemmed | Genetic analysis of reaction time variability: room for improvement? |
title_short | Genetic analysis of reaction time variability: room for improvement? |
title_sort | genetic analysis of reaction time variability: room for improvement? |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3801159/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22975296 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291712002061 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kuntsij geneticanalysisofreactiontimevariabilityroomforimprovement AT frazierwoodac geneticanalysisofreactiontimevariabilityroomforimprovement AT banaschewskit geneticanalysisofreactiontimevariabilityroomforimprovement AT gillm geneticanalysisofreactiontimevariabilityroomforimprovement AT mirandaa geneticanalysisofreactiontimevariabilityroomforimprovement AT oadesrd geneticanalysisofreactiontimevariabilityroomforimprovement AT roeyersh geneticanalysisofreactiontimevariabilityroomforimprovement AT rothenbergera geneticanalysisofreactiontimevariabilityroomforimprovement AT steinhausenhc geneticanalysisofreactiontimevariabilityroomforimprovement AT vandermeerejj geneticanalysisofreactiontimevariabilityroomforimprovement AT faraonesv geneticanalysisofreactiontimevariabilityroomforimprovement AT ashersonp geneticanalysisofreactiontimevariabilityroomforimprovement AT rijsdijkf geneticanalysisofreactiontimevariabilityroomforimprovement |