Cargando…

Prenatal Ultrasound Screening for Fetal Anomalies and Outcomes in High-Risk Pregnancies due to Maternal HIV Infection: A Retrospective Study

Objective. To assess the prevalence of prenatal screening and of adverse outcome in high-risk pregnancies due to maternal HIV infection. Study Design. The prevalence of prenatal screening in 330 pregnancies of HIV-positive women attending the department for prenatal screening and/or during labour be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reitter, A., Stücker, A. U., Buxmann, H., Herrmann, E., Haberl, A. E., Schlößer, R., Louwen, F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3803124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24194633
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/208482
_version_ 1782288097201881088
author Reitter, A.
Stücker, A. U.
Buxmann, H.
Herrmann, E.
Haberl, A. E.
Schlößer, R.
Louwen, F.
author_facet Reitter, A.
Stücker, A. U.
Buxmann, H.
Herrmann, E.
Haberl, A. E.
Schlößer, R.
Louwen, F.
author_sort Reitter, A.
collection PubMed
description Objective. To assess the prevalence of prenatal screening and of adverse outcome in high-risk pregnancies due to maternal HIV infection. Study Design. The prevalence of prenatal screening in 330 pregnancies of HIV-positive women attending the department for prenatal screening and/or during labour between January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2012, was recorded. Screening results were compared with the postnatal outcome and maternal morbidity, and mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) was evaluated. Results. One hundred of 330 women (30.5%) had an early anomaly scan, 252 (74.5%) had a detailed scan at 20–22 weeks, 18 (5.5%) had a detailed scan prior to birth, and three (0.9%) had an amniocentesis. In seven cases (2.12%), a fetal anomaly was detected prenatally and confirmed postnatally, while in eight (2.42%) an anomaly was only detected postnatally, even though a prenatal scan was performed. There were no anomalies in the unscreened group. MTCT occurred in three cases (0.9%) and seven fetal and neonatal deaths (2.1%) were reported. Conclusion. The overall prevalence of prenatal ultrasound screening in our cohort is 74.5%, but often the opportunity for prenatal ultrasonography in the first trimester is missed. In general, the aim should be to offer prenatal ultrasonography in the first trimester in all pregnancies. This allows early reassurance or if fetal disease is suspected, further steps can be taken.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3803124
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38031242013-11-05 Prenatal Ultrasound Screening for Fetal Anomalies and Outcomes in High-Risk Pregnancies due to Maternal HIV Infection: A Retrospective Study Reitter, A. Stücker, A. U. Buxmann, H. Herrmann, E. Haberl, A. E. Schlößer, R. Louwen, F. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol Research Article Objective. To assess the prevalence of prenatal screening and of adverse outcome in high-risk pregnancies due to maternal HIV infection. Study Design. The prevalence of prenatal screening in 330 pregnancies of HIV-positive women attending the department for prenatal screening and/or during labour between January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2012, was recorded. Screening results were compared with the postnatal outcome and maternal morbidity, and mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) was evaluated. Results. One hundred of 330 women (30.5%) had an early anomaly scan, 252 (74.5%) had a detailed scan at 20–22 weeks, 18 (5.5%) had a detailed scan prior to birth, and three (0.9%) had an amniocentesis. In seven cases (2.12%), a fetal anomaly was detected prenatally and confirmed postnatally, while in eight (2.42%) an anomaly was only detected postnatally, even though a prenatal scan was performed. There were no anomalies in the unscreened group. MTCT occurred in three cases (0.9%) and seven fetal and neonatal deaths (2.1%) were reported. Conclusion. The overall prevalence of prenatal ultrasound screening in our cohort is 74.5%, but often the opportunity for prenatal ultrasonography in the first trimester is missed. In general, the aim should be to offer prenatal ultrasonography in the first trimester in all pregnancies. This allows early reassurance or if fetal disease is suspected, further steps can be taken. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3803124/ /pubmed/24194633 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/208482 Text en Copyright © 2013 A. Reitter et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Reitter, A.
Stücker, A. U.
Buxmann, H.
Herrmann, E.
Haberl, A. E.
Schlößer, R.
Louwen, F.
Prenatal Ultrasound Screening for Fetal Anomalies and Outcomes in High-Risk Pregnancies due to Maternal HIV Infection: A Retrospective Study
title Prenatal Ultrasound Screening for Fetal Anomalies and Outcomes in High-Risk Pregnancies due to Maternal HIV Infection: A Retrospective Study
title_full Prenatal Ultrasound Screening for Fetal Anomalies and Outcomes in High-Risk Pregnancies due to Maternal HIV Infection: A Retrospective Study
title_fullStr Prenatal Ultrasound Screening for Fetal Anomalies and Outcomes in High-Risk Pregnancies due to Maternal HIV Infection: A Retrospective Study
title_full_unstemmed Prenatal Ultrasound Screening for Fetal Anomalies and Outcomes in High-Risk Pregnancies due to Maternal HIV Infection: A Retrospective Study
title_short Prenatal Ultrasound Screening for Fetal Anomalies and Outcomes in High-Risk Pregnancies due to Maternal HIV Infection: A Retrospective Study
title_sort prenatal ultrasound screening for fetal anomalies and outcomes in high-risk pregnancies due to maternal hiv infection: a retrospective study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3803124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24194633
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/208482
work_keys_str_mv AT reittera prenatalultrasoundscreeningforfetalanomaliesandoutcomesinhighriskpregnanciesduetomaternalhivinfectionaretrospectivestudy
AT stuckerau prenatalultrasoundscreeningforfetalanomaliesandoutcomesinhighriskpregnanciesduetomaternalhivinfectionaretrospectivestudy
AT buxmannh prenatalultrasoundscreeningforfetalanomaliesandoutcomesinhighriskpregnanciesduetomaternalhivinfectionaretrospectivestudy
AT herrmanne prenatalultrasoundscreeningforfetalanomaliesandoutcomesinhighriskpregnanciesduetomaternalhivinfectionaretrospectivestudy
AT haberlae prenatalultrasoundscreeningforfetalanomaliesandoutcomesinhighriskpregnanciesduetomaternalhivinfectionaretrospectivestudy
AT schloßerr prenatalultrasoundscreeningforfetalanomaliesandoutcomesinhighriskpregnanciesduetomaternalhivinfectionaretrospectivestudy
AT louwenf prenatalultrasoundscreeningforfetalanomaliesandoutcomesinhighriskpregnanciesduetomaternalhivinfectionaretrospectivestudy