Cargando…
Prenatal Ultrasound Screening for Fetal Anomalies and Outcomes in High-Risk Pregnancies due to Maternal HIV Infection: A Retrospective Study
Objective. To assess the prevalence of prenatal screening and of adverse outcome in high-risk pregnancies due to maternal HIV infection. Study Design. The prevalence of prenatal screening in 330 pregnancies of HIV-positive women attending the department for prenatal screening and/or during labour be...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3803124/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24194633 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/208482 |
_version_ | 1782288097201881088 |
---|---|
author | Reitter, A. Stücker, A. U. Buxmann, H. Herrmann, E. Haberl, A. E. Schlößer, R. Louwen, F. |
author_facet | Reitter, A. Stücker, A. U. Buxmann, H. Herrmann, E. Haberl, A. E. Schlößer, R. Louwen, F. |
author_sort | Reitter, A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective. To assess the prevalence of prenatal screening and of adverse outcome in high-risk pregnancies due to maternal HIV infection. Study Design. The prevalence of prenatal screening in 330 pregnancies of HIV-positive women attending the department for prenatal screening and/or during labour between January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2012, was recorded. Screening results were compared with the postnatal outcome and maternal morbidity, and mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) was evaluated. Results. One hundred of 330 women (30.5%) had an early anomaly scan, 252 (74.5%) had a detailed scan at 20–22 weeks, 18 (5.5%) had a detailed scan prior to birth, and three (0.9%) had an amniocentesis. In seven cases (2.12%), a fetal anomaly was detected prenatally and confirmed postnatally, while in eight (2.42%) an anomaly was only detected postnatally, even though a prenatal scan was performed. There were no anomalies in the unscreened group. MTCT occurred in three cases (0.9%) and seven fetal and neonatal deaths (2.1%) were reported. Conclusion. The overall prevalence of prenatal ultrasound screening in our cohort is 74.5%, but often the opportunity for prenatal ultrasonography in the first trimester is missed. In general, the aim should be to offer prenatal ultrasonography in the first trimester in all pregnancies. This allows early reassurance or if fetal disease is suspected, further steps can be taken. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3803124 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38031242013-11-05 Prenatal Ultrasound Screening for Fetal Anomalies and Outcomes in High-Risk Pregnancies due to Maternal HIV Infection: A Retrospective Study Reitter, A. Stücker, A. U. Buxmann, H. Herrmann, E. Haberl, A. E. Schlößer, R. Louwen, F. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol Research Article Objective. To assess the prevalence of prenatal screening and of adverse outcome in high-risk pregnancies due to maternal HIV infection. Study Design. The prevalence of prenatal screening in 330 pregnancies of HIV-positive women attending the department for prenatal screening and/or during labour between January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2012, was recorded. Screening results were compared with the postnatal outcome and maternal morbidity, and mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) was evaluated. Results. One hundred of 330 women (30.5%) had an early anomaly scan, 252 (74.5%) had a detailed scan at 20–22 weeks, 18 (5.5%) had a detailed scan prior to birth, and three (0.9%) had an amniocentesis. In seven cases (2.12%), a fetal anomaly was detected prenatally and confirmed postnatally, while in eight (2.42%) an anomaly was only detected postnatally, even though a prenatal scan was performed. There were no anomalies in the unscreened group. MTCT occurred in three cases (0.9%) and seven fetal and neonatal deaths (2.1%) were reported. Conclusion. The overall prevalence of prenatal ultrasound screening in our cohort is 74.5%, but often the opportunity for prenatal ultrasonography in the first trimester is missed. In general, the aim should be to offer prenatal ultrasonography in the first trimester in all pregnancies. This allows early reassurance or if fetal disease is suspected, further steps can be taken. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3803124/ /pubmed/24194633 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/208482 Text en Copyright © 2013 A. Reitter et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Reitter, A. Stücker, A. U. Buxmann, H. Herrmann, E. Haberl, A. E. Schlößer, R. Louwen, F. Prenatal Ultrasound Screening for Fetal Anomalies and Outcomes in High-Risk Pregnancies due to Maternal HIV Infection: A Retrospective Study |
title | Prenatal Ultrasound Screening for Fetal Anomalies and Outcomes in High-Risk Pregnancies due to Maternal HIV Infection: A Retrospective Study |
title_full | Prenatal Ultrasound Screening for Fetal Anomalies and Outcomes in High-Risk Pregnancies due to Maternal HIV Infection: A Retrospective Study |
title_fullStr | Prenatal Ultrasound Screening for Fetal Anomalies and Outcomes in High-Risk Pregnancies due to Maternal HIV Infection: A Retrospective Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Prenatal Ultrasound Screening for Fetal Anomalies and Outcomes in High-Risk Pregnancies due to Maternal HIV Infection: A Retrospective Study |
title_short | Prenatal Ultrasound Screening for Fetal Anomalies and Outcomes in High-Risk Pregnancies due to Maternal HIV Infection: A Retrospective Study |
title_sort | prenatal ultrasound screening for fetal anomalies and outcomes in high-risk pregnancies due to maternal hiv infection: a retrospective study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3803124/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24194633 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/208482 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reittera prenatalultrasoundscreeningforfetalanomaliesandoutcomesinhighriskpregnanciesduetomaternalhivinfectionaretrospectivestudy AT stuckerau prenatalultrasoundscreeningforfetalanomaliesandoutcomesinhighriskpregnanciesduetomaternalhivinfectionaretrospectivestudy AT buxmannh prenatalultrasoundscreeningforfetalanomaliesandoutcomesinhighriskpregnanciesduetomaternalhivinfectionaretrospectivestudy AT herrmanne prenatalultrasoundscreeningforfetalanomaliesandoutcomesinhighriskpregnanciesduetomaternalhivinfectionaretrospectivestudy AT haberlae prenatalultrasoundscreeningforfetalanomaliesandoutcomesinhighriskpregnanciesduetomaternalhivinfectionaretrospectivestudy AT schloßerr prenatalultrasoundscreeningforfetalanomaliesandoutcomesinhighriskpregnanciesduetomaternalhivinfectionaretrospectivestudy AT louwenf prenatalultrasoundscreeningforfetalanomaliesandoutcomesinhighriskpregnanciesduetomaternalhivinfectionaretrospectivestudy |