Cargando…

External Evaluation of Four Hospitals According to Patient-centred Care Standards

INTRODUCTION: Hospital accreditation is a multi-factorial issue. The aim of the current study was to accredit social security organization and university hospitals (that certificated by ISO 9001-2008) in Isfahan, the second largest city of Iran, based on Joint Commission International (JCI) accredit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tavakoli, Nahid, Abbasi, Shirin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AVICENA 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3804481/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24167387
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/aim.2013.21.176-179
_version_ 1782288152813109248
author Tavakoli, Nahid
Abbasi, Shirin
author_facet Tavakoli, Nahid
Abbasi, Shirin
author_sort Tavakoli, Nahid
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Hospital accreditation is a multi-factorial issue. The aim of the current study was to accredit social security organization and university hospitals (that certificated by ISO 9001-2008) in Isfahan, the second largest city of Iran, based on Joint Commission International (JCI) accreditation standards. METHODS: Accreditation of four hospitals was evaluated and compared in a cross-sectional study. Seven checklists were driven from patient-centered JCI accreditation standards to cover indices of access of patients to care and continuity of care (ACC), patients and families rights (PFR), patients and families education (PFE), assessment of patients (AOP), care of patients (COP), analgesic and surgical care (ASC), and medication management and use (MMU). They were filled out by seven inspectors. The findings were analyzed by SPSS 14 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). RESULTS: Beheshti and Zahra hospitals demonstrated the lowest and the highest mean levels preparation, respectively (60 vs. 68.5 percent, respectively). Also, Beheshti hospital revealed the lowest prepared levels in AOP, ASC, MMU and PFE among all evaluated hospitals; the corresponding mean amounts of preparation were 68, 82.5, 56 and 42 percent, respectively. Whereas Zahra hospital showed the highest prepared levels in AOP, COP, MMU and PFE among all evaluated hospitals; the mean amounts of preparation were 82, 61.5, 84 and 57 percent, respectively. No significant difference was found among the four hospitals in any of the seven indices. DISCUSSION: The four evaluated hospitals were not fully prepared to present the best possible patient-centered care system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3804481
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher AVICENA
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38044812013-10-28 External Evaluation of Four Hospitals According to Patient-centred Care Standards Tavakoli, Nahid Abbasi, Shirin Acta Inform Med Original Paper INTRODUCTION: Hospital accreditation is a multi-factorial issue. The aim of the current study was to accredit social security organization and university hospitals (that certificated by ISO 9001-2008) in Isfahan, the second largest city of Iran, based on Joint Commission International (JCI) accreditation standards. METHODS: Accreditation of four hospitals was evaluated and compared in a cross-sectional study. Seven checklists were driven from patient-centered JCI accreditation standards to cover indices of access of patients to care and continuity of care (ACC), patients and families rights (PFR), patients and families education (PFE), assessment of patients (AOP), care of patients (COP), analgesic and surgical care (ASC), and medication management and use (MMU). They were filled out by seven inspectors. The findings were analyzed by SPSS 14 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). RESULTS: Beheshti and Zahra hospitals demonstrated the lowest and the highest mean levels preparation, respectively (60 vs. 68.5 percent, respectively). Also, Beheshti hospital revealed the lowest prepared levels in AOP, ASC, MMU and PFE among all evaluated hospitals; the corresponding mean amounts of preparation were 68, 82.5, 56 and 42 percent, respectively. Whereas Zahra hospital showed the highest prepared levels in AOP, COP, MMU and PFE among all evaluated hospitals; the mean amounts of preparation were 82, 61.5, 84 and 57 percent, respectively. No significant difference was found among the four hospitals in any of the seven indices. DISCUSSION: The four evaluated hospitals were not fully prepared to present the best possible patient-centered care system. AVICENA 2013-09 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3804481/ /pubmed/24167387 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/aim.2013.21.176-179 Text en © 2013 AVICENA http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Tavakoli, Nahid
Abbasi, Shirin
External Evaluation of Four Hospitals According to Patient-centred Care Standards
title External Evaluation of Four Hospitals According to Patient-centred Care Standards
title_full External Evaluation of Four Hospitals According to Patient-centred Care Standards
title_fullStr External Evaluation of Four Hospitals According to Patient-centred Care Standards
title_full_unstemmed External Evaluation of Four Hospitals According to Patient-centred Care Standards
title_short External Evaluation of Four Hospitals According to Patient-centred Care Standards
title_sort external evaluation of four hospitals according to patient-centred care standards
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3804481/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24167387
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/aim.2013.21.176-179
work_keys_str_mv AT tavakolinahid externalevaluationoffourhospitalsaccordingtopatientcentredcarestandards
AT abbasishirin externalevaluationoffourhospitalsaccordingtopatientcentredcarestandards