Cargando…

Preoperative N Staging of Gastric Cancer by Stomach Protocol Computed Tomography

PURPOSE: Clinical stage of gastric cancer is currently assessed by computed tomography. Accurate clinical staging is important for the tailoring of therapy. This study evaluated the accuracy of clinical N staging using stomach protocol computed tomography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between March 2004 a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Se Hoon, Kim, Jeong Jae, Lee, Jeong Sub, Kim, Seung Hyoung, Kim, Bong Soo, Maeng, Young Hee, Hyun, Chang Lim, Kim, Min Jeong, Jeong, In Ho
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Gastric Cancer Association 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3804673/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24156034
http://dx.doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2013.13.3.149
_version_ 1782288199364640768
author Kim, Se Hoon
Kim, Jeong Jae
Lee, Jeong Sub
Kim, Seung Hyoung
Kim, Bong Soo
Maeng, Young Hee
Hyun, Chang Lim
Kim, Min Jeong
Jeong, In Ho
author_facet Kim, Se Hoon
Kim, Jeong Jae
Lee, Jeong Sub
Kim, Seung Hyoung
Kim, Bong Soo
Maeng, Young Hee
Hyun, Chang Lim
Kim, Min Jeong
Jeong, In Ho
author_sort Kim, Se Hoon
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Clinical stage of gastric cancer is currently assessed by computed tomography. Accurate clinical staging is important for the tailoring of therapy. This study evaluated the accuracy of clinical N staging using stomach protocol computed tomography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between March 2004 and November 2012, 171 patients with gastric cancer underwent preoperative stomach protocol computed tomography (Jeju National University Hospital; Jeju, Korea). Their demographic and clinical characteristics were reviewed retrospectively. Two radiologists evaluated cN staging using axial and coronal computed tomography images, and cN stage was matched with pathologic results. The diagnostic accuracy of stomach protocol computed tomography for clinical N staging and clinical characteristics associated with diagnostic accuracy were evaluated. RESULTS: The overall accuracy of stomach protocol computed tomography for cN staging was 63.2%. Computed tomography images of slice thickness 3.0 mm had a sensitivity of 60.0%; a specificity of 89.6%; an accuracy of 78.4%; and a positive predictive value of 78.0% in detecting lymph node metastases. Underestimation of cN stage was associated with larger tumor size (P<0.001), undifferentiated type (P=0.003), diffuse type (P=0.020), more advanced pathologic stage (P<0.001), and larger numbers of harvested and metastatic lymph nodes (P<0.001 each). Tumor differentiation was an independent factor affecting underestimation by computed tomography (P=0.045). CONCLUSIONS: Computed tomography with a size criterion of 8 mm is highly specific but relatively insensitive in detecting nodal metastases. Physicians should keep in mind that computed tomography may not be an appropriate tool to detect nodal metastases for choosing appropriate treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3804673
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher The Korean Gastric Cancer Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38046732013-10-23 Preoperative N Staging of Gastric Cancer by Stomach Protocol Computed Tomography Kim, Se Hoon Kim, Jeong Jae Lee, Jeong Sub Kim, Seung Hyoung Kim, Bong Soo Maeng, Young Hee Hyun, Chang Lim Kim, Min Jeong Jeong, In Ho J Gastric Cancer Original Article PURPOSE: Clinical stage of gastric cancer is currently assessed by computed tomography. Accurate clinical staging is important for the tailoring of therapy. This study evaluated the accuracy of clinical N staging using stomach protocol computed tomography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between March 2004 and November 2012, 171 patients with gastric cancer underwent preoperative stomach protocol computed tomography (Jeju National University Hospital; Jeju, Korea). Their demographic and clinical characteristics were reviewed retrospectively. Two radiologists evaluated cN staging using axial and coronal computed tomography images, and cN stage was matched with pathologic results. The diagnostic accuracy of stomach protocol computed tomography for clinical N staging and clinical characteristics associated with diagnostic accuracy were evaluated. RESULTS: The overall accuracy of stomach protocol computed tomography for cN staging was 63.2%. Computed tomography images of slice thickness 3.0 mm had a sensitivity of 60.0%; a specificity of 89.6%; an accuracy of 78.4%; and a positive predictive value of 78.0% in detecting lymph node metastases. Underestimation of cN stage was associated with larger tumor size (P<0.001), undifferentiated type (P=0.003), diffuse type (P=0.020), more advanced pathologic stage (P<0.001), and larger numbers of harvested and metastatic lymph nodes (P<0.001 each). Tumor differentiation was an independent factor affecting underestimation by computed tomography (P=0.045). CONCLUSIONS: Computed tomography with a size criterion of 8 mm is highly specific but relatively insensitive in detecting nodal metastases. Physicians should keep in mind that computed tomography may not be an appropriate tool to detect nodal metastases for choosing appropriate treatment. The Korean Gastric Cancer Association 2013-09 2013-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3804673/ /pubmed/24156034 http://dx.doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2013.13.3.149 Text en Copyright © 2013 by The Korean Gastric Cancer Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Se Hoon
Kim, Jeong Jae
Lee, Jeong Sub
Kim, Seung Hyoung
Kim, Bong Soo
Maeng, Young Hee
Hyun, Chang Lim
Kim, Min Jeong
Jeong, In Ho
Preoperative N Staging of Gastric Cancer by Stomach Protocol Computed Tomography
title Preoperative N Staging of Gastric Cancer by Stomach Protocol Computed Tomography
title_full Preoperative N Staging of Gastric Cancer by Stomach Protocol Computed Tomography
title_fullStr Preoperative N Staging of Gastric Cancer by Stomach Protocol Computed Tomography
title_full_unstemmed Preoperative N Staging of Gastric Cancer by Stomach Protocol Computed Tomography
title_short Preoperative N Staging of Gastric Cancer by Stomach Protocol Computed Tomography
title_sort preoperative n staging of gastric cancer by stomach protocol computed tomography
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3804673/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24156034
http://dx.doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2013.13.3.149
work_keys_str_mv AT kimsehoon preoperativenstagingofgastriccancerbystomachprotocolcomputedtomography
AT kimjeongjae preoperativenstagingofgastriccancerbystomachprotocolcomputedtomography
AT leejeongsub preoperativenstagingofgastriccancerbystomachprotocolcomputedtomography
AT kimseunghyoung preoperativenstagingofgastriccancerbystomachprotocolcomputedtomography
AT kimbongsoo preoperativenstagingofgastriccancerbystomachprotocolcomputedtomography
AT maengyounghee preoperativenstagingofgastriccancerbystomachprotocolcomputedtomography
AT hyunchanglim preoperativenstagingofgastriccancerbystomachprotocolcomputedtomography
AT kimminjeong preoperativenstagingofgastriccancerbystomachprotocolcomputedtomography
AT jeonginho preoperativenstagingofgastriccancerbystomachprotocolcomputedtomography