Cargando…
Controls on Water Use for Thermoelectric Generation: Case Study Texas, U.S.
[Image: see text] Large-scale U.S. dependence on thermoelectric (steam electric) generation requiring water for cooling underscores the need to understand controls on this water use. The study objective was to quantify water consumption and withdrawal for thermoelectric generation, identifying contr...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2013
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3805314/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23937226 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es4029183 |
_version_ | 1782477856205438976 |
---|---|
author | Scanlon, Bridget R. Reedy, Robert C. Duncan, Ian Mullican, William F. Young, Michael |
author_facet | Scanlon, Bridget R. Reedy, Robert C. Duncan, Ian Mullican, William F. Young, Michael |
author_sort | Scanlon, Bridget R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] Large-scale U.S. dependence on thermoelectric (steam electric) generation requiring water for cooling underscores the need to understand controls on this water use. The study objective was to quantify water consumption and withdrawal for thermoelectric generation, identifying controls, using Texas as a case study. Water consumption for thermoelectricity in Texas in 2010 totaled ∼0.43 million acre feet (maf; 0.53 km(3)), accounting for ∼4% of total state water consumption. High water withdrawals (26.2 maf, 32.3 km(3)) mostly reflect circulation between ponds and power plants, with only two-thirds of this water required for cooling. Controls on water consumption include (1) generator technology/thermal efficiency and (2) cooling system, resulting in statewide consumption intensity for natural gas combined cycle generators with mostly cooling towers (0.19 gal/kWh) being 63% lower than that of traditional coal, nuclear, or natural gas steam turbine generators with mostly cooling ponds (0.52 gal/kWh). The primary control on water withdrawals is cooling system, with ∼2 orders of magnitude lower withdrawals for cooling towers relative to once-through ponds statewide. Increases in natural gas combined cycle plants with cooling towers in response to high production of low-cost natural gas has greatly reduced water demand for thermoelectric cooling since 2000. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3805314 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | American Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38053142013-10-22 Controls on Water Use for Thermoelectric Generation: Case Study Texas, U.S. Scanlon, Bridget R. Reedy, Robert C. Duncan, Ian Mullican, William F. Young, Michael Environ Sci Technol [Image: see text] Large-scale U.S. dependence on thermoelectric (steam electric) generation requiring water for cooling underscores the need to understand controls on this water use. The study objective was to quantify water consumption and withdrawal for thermoelectric generation, identifying controls, using Texas as a case study. Water consumption for thermoelectricity in Texas in 2010 totaled ∼0.43 million acre feet (maf; 0.53 km(3)), accounting for ∼4% of total state water consumption. High water withdrawals (26.2 maf, 32.3 km(3)) mostly reflect circulation between ponds and power plants, with only two-thirds of this water required for cooling. Controls on water consumption include (1) generator technology/thermal efficiency and (2) cooling system, resulting in statewide consumption intensity for natural gas combined cycle generators with mostly cooling towers (0.19 gal/kWh) being 63% lower than that of traditional coal, nuclear, or natural gas steam turbine generators with mostly cooling ponds (0.52 gal/kWh). The primary control on water withdrawals is cooling system, with ∼2 orders of magnitude lower withdrawals for cooling towers relative to once-through ponds statewide. Increases in natural gas combined cycle plants with cooling towers in response to high production of low-cost natural gas has greatly reduced water demand for thermoelectric cooling since 2000. American Chemical Society 2013-08-12 2013-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3805314/ /pubmed/23937226 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es4029183 Text en Copyright © 2013 American Chemical Society Terms of Use (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_termsofuse.html) |
spellingShingle | Scanlon, Bridget R. Reedy, Robert C. Duncan, Ian Mullican, William F. Young, Michael Controls on Water Use for Thermoelectric Generation: Case Study Texas, U.S. |
title | Controls on Water Use for Thermoelectric Generation:
Case Study Texas, U.S. |
title_full | Controls on Water Use for Thermoelectric Generation:
Case Study Texas, U.S. |
title_fullStr | Controls on Water Use for Thermoelectric Generation:
Case Study Texas, U.S. |
title_full_unstemmed | Controls on Water Use for Thermoelectric Generation:
Case Study Texas, U.S. |
title_short | Controls on Water Use for Thermoelectric Generation:
Case Study Texas, U.S. |
title_sort | controls on water use for thermoelectric generation:
case study texas, u.s. |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3805314/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23937226 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es4029183 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT scanlonbridgetr controlsonwateruseforthermoelectricgenerationcasestudytexasus AT reedyrobertc controlsonwateruseforthermoelectricgenerationcasestudytexasus AT duncanian controlsonwateruseforthermoelectricgenerationcasestudytexasus AT mullicanwilliamf controlsonwateruseforthermoelectricgenerationcasestudytexasus AT youngmichael controlsonwateruseforthermoelectricgenerationcasestudytexasus |