Cargando…

Controls on Water Use for Thermoelectric Generation: Case Study Texas, U.S.

[Image: see text] Large-scale U.S. dependence on thermoelectric (steam electric) generation requiring water for cooling underscores the need to understand controls on this water use. The study objective was to quantify water consumption and withdrawal for thermoelectric generation, identifying contr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scanlon, Bridget R., Reedy, Robert C., Duncan, Ian, Mullican, William F., Young, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2013
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3805314/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23937226
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es4029183
_version_ 1782477856205438976
author Scanlon, Bridget R.
Reedy, Robert C.
Duncan, Ian
Mullican, William F.
Young, Michael
author_facet Scanlon, Bridget R.
Reedy, Robert C.
Duncan, Ian
Mullican, William F.
Young, Michael
author_sort Scanlon, Bridget R.
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Large-scale U.S. dependence on thermoelectric (steam electric) generation requiring water for cooling underscores the need to understand controls on this water use. The study objective was to quantify water consumption and withdrawal for thermoelectric generation, identifying controls, using Texas as a case study. Water consumption for thermoelectricity in Texas in 2010 totaled ∼0.43 million acre feet (maf; 0.53 km(3)), accounting for ∼4% of total state water consumption. High water withdrawals (26.2 maf, 32.3 km(3)) mostly reflect circulation between ponds and power plants, with only two-thirds of this water required for cooling. Controls on water consumption include (1) generator technology/thermal efficiency and (2) cooling system, resulting in statewide consumption intensity for natural gas combined cycle generators with mostly cooling towers (0.19 gal/kWh) being 63% lower than that of traditional coal, nuclear, or natural gas steam turbine generators with mostly cooling ponds (0.52 gal/kWh). The primary control on water withdrawals is cooling system, with ∼2 orders of magnitude lower withdrawals for cooling towers relative to once-through ponds statewide. Increases in natural gas combined cycle plants with cooling towers in response to high production of low-cost natural gas has greatly reduced water demand for thermoelectric cooling since 2000.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3805314
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38053142013-10-22 Controls on Water Use for Thermoelectric Generation: Case Study Texas, U.S. Scanlon, Bridget R. Reedy, Robert C. Duncan, Ian Mullican, William F. Young, Michael Environ Sci Technol [Image: see text] Large-scale U.S. dependence on thermoelectric (steam electric) generation requiring water for cooling underscores the need to understand controls on this water use. The study objective was to quantify water consumption and withdrawal for thermoelectric generation, identifying controls, using Texas as a case study. Water consumption for thermoelectricity in Texas in 2010 totaled ∼0.43 million acre feet (maf; 0.53 km(3)), accounting for ∼4% of total state water consumption. High water withdrawals (26.2 maf, 32.3 km(3)) mostly reflect circulation between ponds and power plants, with only two-thirds of this water required for cooling. Controls on water consumption include (1) generator technology/thermal efficiency and (2) cooling system, resulting in statewide consumption intensity for natural gas combined cycle generators with mostly cooling towers (0.19 gal/kWh) being 63% lower than that of traditional coal, nuclear, or natural gas steam turbine generators with mostly cooling ponds (0.52 gal/kWh). The primary control on water withdrawals is cooling system, with ∼2 orders of magnitude lower withdrawals for cooling towers relative to once-through ponds statewide. Increases in natural gas combined cycle plants with cooling towers in response to high production of low-cost natural gas has greatly reduced water demand for thermoelectric cooling since 2000. American Chemical Society 2013-08-12 2013-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3805314/ /pubmed/23937226 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es4029183 Text en Copyright © 2013 American Chemical Society Terms of Use (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_termsofuse.html)
spellingShingle Scanlon, Bridget R.
Reedy, Robert C.
Duncan, Ian
Mullican, William F.
Young, Michael
Controls on Water Use for Thermoelectric Generation: Case Study Texas, U.S.
title Controls on Water Use for Thermoelectric Generation: Case Study Texas, U.S.
title_full Controls on Water Use for Thermoelectric Generation: Case Study Texas, U.S.
title_fullStr Controls on Water Use for Thermoelectric Generation: Case Study Texas, U.S.
title_full_unstemmed Controls on Water Use for Thermoelectric Generation: Case Study Texas, U.S.
title_short Controls on Water Use for Thermoelectric Generation: Case Study Texas, U.S.
title_sort controls on water use for thermoelectric generation: case study texas, u.s.
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3805314/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23937226
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es4029183
work_keys_str_mv AT scanlonbridgetr controlsonwateruseforthermoelectricgenerationcasestudytexasus
AT reedyrobertc controlsonwateruseforthermoelectricgenerationcasestudytexasus
AT duncanian controlsonwateruseforthermoelectricgenerationcasestudytexasus
AT mullicanwilliamf controlsonwateruseforthermoelectricgenerationcasestudytexasus
AT youngmichael controlsonwateruseforthermoelectricgenerationcasestudytexasus