Cargando…

Impact of wound edge protection devices on surgical site infection after laparotomy: multicentre randomised controlled trial (ROSSINI Trial)

Objective To determine the clinical effectiveness of wound edge protection devices in reducing surgical site infection after abdominal surgery. Design Multicentre observer blinded randomised controlled trial. Participants Patients undergoing laparotomy at 21 UK hospitals. Interventions Standard care...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pinkney, Thomas D, Calvert, Melanie, Bartlett, David C, Gheorghe, Adrian, Redman, Val, Dowswell, George, Hawkins, William, Mak, Tony, Youssef, Haney, Richardson, Caroline, Hornby, Steven, Magill, Laura, Haslop, Richard, Wilson, Sue, Morton, Dion
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3805488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23903454
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f4305
_version_ 1782477869231898624
author Pinkney, Thomas D
Calvert, Melanie
Bartlett, David C
Gheorghe, Adrian
Redman, Val
Dowswell, George
Hawkins, William
Mak, Tony
Youssef, Haney
Richardson, Caroline
Hornby, Steven
Magill, Laura
Haslop, Richard
Wilson, Sue
Morton, Dion
author_facet Pinkney, Thomas D
Calvert, Melanie
Bartlett, David C
Gheorghe, Adrian
Redman, Val
Dowswell, George
Hawkins, William
Mak, Tony
Youssef, Haney
Richardson, Caroline
Hornby, Steven
Magill, Laura
Haslop, Richard
Wilson, Sue
Morton, Dion
author_sort Pinkney, Thomas D
collection PubMed
description Objective To determine the clinical effectiveness of wound edge protection devices in reducing surgical site infection after abdominal surgery. Design Multicentre observer blinded randomised controlled trial. Participants Patients undergoing laparotomy at 21 UK hospitals. Interventions Standard care or the use of a wound edge protection device during surgery. Main outcome measures Surgical site infection within 30 days of surgery, assessed by blinded clinicians at seven and 30 days and by patient’s self report for the intervening period. Secondary outcomes included quality of life, duration of stay in hospital, and the effect of characteristics of the patient and operation on the efficacy of the device. Results 760 patients were enrolled with 382 patients assigned to the device group and 378 to the control group. Six patients in the device group and five in the control group did not undergo laparotomy. Fourteen patients, seven in each group, were lost to follow-up. A total of 184 patients experienced surgical site infection within 30 days of surgery, 91/369 (24.7%) in the device group and 93/366 (25.4%) in the control group (odds ratio 0.97, 95% confidence interval 0.69 to 1.36; P=0.85). This lack of benefit was consistent across wound assessments performed by clinicians and those reported by patients and across all secondary outcomes. In the secondary analyses no subgroup could be identified in which there was evidence of clinical benefit associated with use of the device. Conclusions Wound edge protection devices do not reduce the rate of surgical site infection in patients undergoing laparotomy, and therefore their routine use for this role cannot be recommended. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN 40402832
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3805488
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38054882014-01-15 Impact of wound edge protection devices on surgical site infection after laparotomy: multicentre randomised controlled trial (ROSSINI Trial) Pinkney, Thomas D Calvert, Melanie Bartlett, David C Gheorghe, Adrian Redman, Val Dowswell, George Hawkins, William Mak, Tony Youssef, Haney Richardson, Caroline Hornby, Steven Magill, Laura Haslop, Richard Wilson, Sue Morton, Dion BMJ Research Objective To determine the clinical effectiveness of wound edge protection devices in reducing surgical site infection after abdominal surgery. Design Multicentre observer blinded randomised controlled trial. Participants Patients undergoing laparotomy at 21 UK hospitals. Interventions Standard care or the use of a wound edge protection device during surgery. Main outcome measures Surgical site infection within 30 days of surgery, assessed by blinded clinicians at seven and 30 days and by patient’s self report for the intervening period. Secondary outcomes included quality of life, duration of stay in hospital, and the effect of characteristics of the patient and operation on the efficacy of the device. Results 760 patients were enrolled with 382 patients assigned to the device group and 378 to the control group. Six patients in the device group and five in the control group did not undergo laparotomy. Fourteen patients, seven in each group, were lost to follow-up. A total of 184 patients experienced surgical site infection within 30 days of surgery, 91/369 (24.7%) in the device group and 93/366 (25.4%) in the control group (odds ratio 0.97, 95% confidence interval 0.69 to 1.36; P=0.85). This lack of benefit was consistent across wound assessments performed by clinicians and those reported by patients and across all secondary outcomes. In the secondary analyses no subgroup could be identified in which there was evidence of clinical benefit associated with use of the device. Conclusions Wound edge protection devices do not reduce the rate of surgical site infection in patients undergoing laparotomy, and therefore their routine use for this role cannot be recommended. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN 40402832 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2013-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3805488/ /pubmed/23903454 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f4305 Text en © Pinkney et al 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Pinkney, Thomas D
Calvert, Melanie
Bartlett, David C
Gheorghe, Adrian
Redman, Val
Dowswell, George
Hawkins, William
Mak, Tony
Youssef, Haney
Richardson, Caroline
Hornby, Steven
Magill, Laura
Haslop, Richard
Wilson, Sue
Morton, Dion
Impact of wound edge protection devices on surgical site infection after laparotomy: multicentre randomised controlled trial (ROSSINI Trial)
title Impact of wound edge protection devices on surgical site infection after laparotomy: multicentre randomised controlled trial (ROSSINI Trial)
title_full Impact of wound edge protection devices on surgical site infection after laparotomy: multicentre randomised controlled trial (ROSSINI Trial)
title_fullStr Impact of wound edge protection devices on surgical site infection after laparotomy: multicentre randomised controlled trial (ROSSINI Trial)
title_full_unstemmed Impact of wound edge protection devices on surgical site infection after laparotomy: multicentre randomised controlled trial (ROSSINI Trial)
title_short Impact of wound edge protection devices on surgical site infection after laparotomy: multicentre randomised controlled trial (ROSSINI Trial)
title_sort impact of wound edge protection devices on surgical site infection after laparotomy: multicentre randomised controlled trial (rossini trial)
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3805488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23903454
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f4305
work_keys_str_mv AT pinkneythomasd impactofwoundedgeprotectiondevicesonsurgicalsiteinfectionafterlaparotomymulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialrossinitrial
AT calvertmelanie impactofwoundedgeprotectiondevicesonsurgicalsiteinfectionafterlaparotomymulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialrossinitrial
AT bartlettdavidc impactofwoundedgeprotectiondevicesonsurgicalsiteinfectionafterlaparotomymulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialrossinitrial
AT gheorgheadrian impactofwoundedgeprotectiondevicesonsurgicalsiteinfectionafterlaparotomymulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialrossinitrial
AT redmanval impactofwoundedgeprotectiondevicesonsurgicalsiteinfectionafterlaparotomymulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialrossinitrial
AT dowswellgeorge impactofwoundedgeprotectiondevicesonsurgicalsiteinfectionafterlaparotomymulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialrossinitrial
AT hawkinswilliam impactofwoundedgeprotectiondevicesonsurgicalsiteinfectionafterlaparotomymulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialrossinitrial
AT maktony impactofwoundedgeprotectiondevicesonsurgicalsiteinfectionafterlaparotomymulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialrossinitrial
AT youssefhaney impactofwoundedgeprotectiondevicesonsurgicalsiteinfectionafterlaparotomymulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialrossinitrial
AT richardsoncaroline impactofwoundedgeprotectiondevicesonsurgicalsiteinfectionafterlaparotomymulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialrossinitrial
AT hornbysteven impactofwoundedgeprotectiondevicesonsurgicalsiteinfectionafterlaparotomymulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialrossinitrial
AT magilllaura impactofwoundedgeprotectiondevicesonsurgicalsiteinfectionafterlaparotomymulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialrossinitrial
AT hasloprichard impactofwoundedgeprotectiondevicesonsurgicalsiteinfectionafterlaparotomymulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialrossinitrial
AT wilsonsue impactofwoundedgeprotectiondevicesonsurgicalsiteinfectionafterlaparotomymulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialrossinitrial
AT mortondion impactofwoundedgeprotectiondevicesonsurgicalsiteinfectionafterlaparotomymulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialrossinitrial