Cargando…
Impact of wound edge protection devices on surgical site infection after laparotomy: multicentre randomised controlled trial (ROSSINI Trial)
Objective To determine the clinical effectiveness of wound edge protection devices in reducing surgical site infection after abdominal surgery. Design Multicentre observer blinded randomised controlled trial. Participants Patients undergoing laparotomy at 21 UK hospitals. Interventions Standard care...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3805488/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23903454 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f4305 |
_version_ | 1782477869231898624 |
---|---|
author | Pinkney, Thomas D Calvert, Melanie Bartlett, David C Gheorghe, Adrian Redman, Val Dowswell, George Hawkins, William Mak, Tony Youssef, Haney Richardson, Caroline Hornby, Steven Magill, Laura Haslop, Richard Wilson, Sue Morton, Dion |
author_facet | Pinkney, Thomas D Calvert, Melanie Bartlett, David C Gheorghe, Adrian Redman, Val Dowswell, George Hawkins, William Mak, Tony Youssef, Haney Richardson, Caroline Hornby, Steven Magill, Laura Haslop, Richard Wilson, Sue Morton, Dion |
author_sort | Pinkney, Thomas D |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective To determine the clinical effectiveness of wound edge protection devices in reducing surgical site infection after abdominal surgery. Design Multicentre observer blinded randomised controlled trial. Participants Patients undergoing laparotomy at 21 UK hospitals. Interventions Standard care or the use of a wound edge protection device during surgery. Main outcome measures Surgical site infection within 30 days of surgery, assessed by blinded clinicians at seven and 30 days and by patient’s self report for the intervening period. Secondary outcomes included quality of life, duration of stay in hospital, and the effect of characteristics of the patient and operation on the efficacy of the device. Results 760 patients were enrolled with 382 patients assigned to the device group and 378 to the control group. Six patients in the device group and five in the control group did not undergo laparotomy. Fourteen patients, seven in each group, were lost to follow-up. A total of 184 patients experienced surgical site infection within 30 days of surgery, 91/369 (24.7%) in the device group and 93/366 (25.4%) in the control group (odds ratio 0.97, 95% confidence interval 0.69 to 1.36; P=0.85). This lack of benefit was consistent across wound assessments performed by clinicians and those reported by patients and across all secondary outcomes. In the secondary analyses no subgroup could be identified in which there was evidence of clinical benefit associated with use of the device. Conclusions Wound edge protection devices do not reduce the rate of surgical site infection in patients undergoing laparotomy, and therefore their routine use for this role cannot be recommended. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN 40402832 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3805488 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38054882014-01-15 Impact of wound edge protection devices on surgical site infection after laparotomy: multicentre randomised controlled trial (ROSSINI Trial) Pinkney, Thomas D Calvert, Melanie Bartlett, David C Gheorghe, Adrian Redman, Val Dowswell, George Hawkins, William Mak, Tony Youssef, Haney Richardson, Caroline Hornby, Steven Magill, Laura Haslop, Richard Wilson, Sue Morton, Dion BMJ Research Objective To determine the clinical effectiveness of wound edge protection devices in reducing surgical site infection after abdominal surgery. Design Multicentre observer blinded randomised controlled trial. Participants Patients undergoing laparotomy at 21 UK hospitals. Interventions Standard care or the use of a wound edge protection device during surgery. Main outcome measures Surgical site infection within 30 days of surgery, assessed by blinded clinicians at seven and 30 days and by patient’s self report for the intervening period. Secondary outcomes included quality of life, duration of stay in hospital, and the effect of characteristics of the patient and operation on the efficacy of the device. Results 760 patients were enrolled with 382 patients assigned to the device group and 378 to the control group. Six patients in the device group and five in the control group did not undergo laparotomy. Fourteen patients, seven in each group, were lost to follow-up. A total of 184 patients experienced surgical site infection within 30 days of surgery, 91/369 (24.7%) in the device group and 93/366 (25.4%) in the control group (odds ratio 0.97, 95% confidence interval 0.69 to 1.36; P=0.85). This lack of benefit was consistent across wound assessments performed by clinicians and those reported by patients and across all secondary outcomes. In the secondary analyses no subgroup could be identified in which there was evidence of clinical benefit associated with use of the device. Conclusions Wound edge protection devices do not reduce the rate of surgical site infection in patients undergoing laparotomy, and therefore their routine use for this role cannot be recommended. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN 40402832 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2013-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3805488/ /pubmed/23903454 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f4305 Text en © Pinkney et al 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Pinkney, Thomas D Calvert, Melanie Bartlett, David C Gheorghe, Adrian Redman, Val Dowswell, George Hawkins, William Mak, Tony Youssef, Haney Richardson, Caroline Hornby, Steven Magill, Laura Haslop, Richard Wilson, Sue Morton, Dion Impact of wound edge protection devices on surgical site infection after laparotomy: multicentre randomised controlled trial (ROSSINI Trial) |
title | Impact of wound edge protection devices on surgical site infection after laparotomy: multicentre randomised controlled trial (ROSSINI Trial) |
title_full | Impact of wound edge protection devices on surgical site infection after laparotomy: multicentre randomised controlled trial (ROSSINI Trial) |
title_fullStr | Impact of wound edge protection devices on surgical site infection after laparotomy: multicentre randomised controlled trial (ROSSINI Trial) |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of wound edge protection devices on surgical site infection after laparotomy: multicentre randomised controlled trial (ROSSINI Trial) |
title_short | Impact of wound edge protection devices on surgical site infection after laparotomy: multicentre randomised controlled trial (ROSSINI Trial) |
title_sort | impact of wound edge protection devices on surgical site infection after laparotomy: multicentre randomised controlled trial (rossini trial) |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3805488/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23903454 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f4305 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pinkneythomasd impactofwoundedgeprotectiondevicesonsurgicalsiteinfectionafterlaparotomymulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialrossinitrial AT calvertmelanie impactofwoundedgeprotectiondevicesonsurgicalsiteinfectionafterlaparotomymulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialrossinitrial AT bartlettdavidc impactofwoundedgeprotectiondevicesonsurgicalsiteinfectionafterlaparotomymulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialrossinitrial AT gheorgheadrian impactofwoundedgeprotectiondevicesonsurgicalsiteinfectionafterlaparotomymulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialrossinitrial AT redmanval impactofwoundedgeprotectiondevicesonsurgicalsiteinfectionafterlaparotomymulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialrossinitrial AT dowswellgeorge impactofwoundedgeprotectiondevicesonsurgicalsiteinfectionafterlaparotomymulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialrossinitrial AT hawkinswilliam impactofwoundedgeprotectiondevicesonsurgicalsiteinfectionafterlaparotomymulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialrossinitrial AT maktony impactofwoundedgeprotectiondevicesonsurgicalsiteinfectionafterlaparotomymulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialrossinitrial AT youssefhaney impactofwoundedgeprotectiondevicesonsurgicalsiteinfectionafterlaparotomymulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialrossinitrial AT richardsoncaroline impactofwoundedgeprotectiondevicesonsurgicalsiteinfectionafterlaparotomymulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialrossinitrial AT hornbysteven impactofwoundedgeprotectiondevicesonsurgicalsiteinfectionafterlaparotomymulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialrossinitrial AT magilllaura impactofwoundedgeprotectiondevicesonsurgicalsiteinfectionafterlaparotomymulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialrossinitrial AT hasloprichard impactofwoundedgeprotectiondevicesonsurgicalsiteinfectionafterlaparotomymulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialrossinitrial AT wilsonsue impactofwoundedgeprotectiondevicesonsurgicalsiteinfectionafterlaparotomymulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialrossinitrial AT mortondion impactofwoundedgeprotectiondevicesonsurgicalsiteinfectionafterlaparotomymulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialrossinitrial |