Cargando…

Non-invasive versus invasive respiratory support in preterm infants at birth: systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective To assess the role of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) initiated at birth for prevention of death and bronchopulmonary dysplasia in very preterm infants. Design Systematic review. Data sources PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and online Pe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schmölzer, Georg M, Kumar, Manoj, Pichler, Gerhard, Aziz, Khalid, O’Reilly, Megan, Cheung, Po-Yin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3805496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24136633
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f5980
_version_ 1782477870563590144
author Schmölzer, Georg M
Kumar, Manoj
Pichler, Gerhard
Aziz, Khalid
O’Reilly, Megan
Cheung, Po-Yin
author_facet Schmölzer, Georg M
Kumar, Manoj
Pichler, Gerhard
Aziz, Khalid
O’Reilly, Megan
Cheung, Po-Yin
author_sort Schmölzer, Georg M
collection PubMed
description Objective To assess the role of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) initiated at birth for prevention of death and bronchopulmonary dysplasia in very preterm infants. Design Systematic review. Data sources PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and online Pediatric Academic Society abstracts from the year of inception to June 2013. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Randomised controlled trials evaluating the effect of nasal CPAP compared with intubation in preterm infants born at less than 32 weeks’ gestation and presenting the outcomes of either death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia, or both (defined as the need for oxygen support or mechanical ventilation at 36 weeks corrected gestation), during hospital stay. Results Four randomised controlled trials (2782 participants) met the inclusion criteria, with 1296 infants in the nasal CPAP group and 1486 in the intubation group. All the trials reported bronchopulmonary dysplasia independently at 36 weeks corrected gestation, with borderline significance in favour of the nasal CPAP group (relative risk 0.91, 95% confidence interval 0.82 to 1.01, risk difference −0.03, 95% confidence interval −0.07 to 0.01). No difference in death was observed (relative risk 0.88, 0.68 to 1.14, risk difference −0.02, −0.04 to 0.01, respectively). Pooled analysis showed a significant benefit for the combined outcome of death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia, or both, at 36 weeks corrected gestation for babies treated with nasal CPAP (relative risk 0.91, 0.84 to 0.99, risk difference −0.04, -0.07 to 0.00), number needed to treat of 25). Conclusion One additional infant could survive to 36 weeks without bronchopulmonary dysplasia for every 25 babies treated with nasal CPAP in the delivery room rather than being intubated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3805496
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38054962013-10-24 Non-invasive versus invasive respiratory support in preterm infants at birth: systematic review and meta-analysis Schmölzer, Georg M Kumar, Manoj Pichler, Gerhard Aziz, Khalid O’Reilly, Megan Cheung, Po-Yin BMJ Research Objective To assess the role of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) initiated at birth for prevention of death and bronchopulmonary dysplasia in very preterm infants. Design Systematic review. Data sources PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and online Pediatric Academic Society abstracts from the year of inception to June 2013. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Randomised controlled trials evaluating the effect of nasal CPAP compared with intubation in preterm infants born at less than 32 weeks’ gestation and presenting the outcomes of either death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia, or both (defined as the need for oxygen support or mechanical ventilation at 36 weeks corrected gestation), during hospital stay. Results Four randomised controlled trials (2782 participants) met the inclusion criteria, with 1296 infants in the nasal CPAP group and 1486 in the intubation group. All the trials reported bronchopulmonary dysplasia independently at 36 weeks corrected gestation, with borderline significance in favour of the nasal CPAP group (relative risk 0.91, 95% confidence interval 0.82 to 1.01, risk difference −0.03, 95% confidence interval −0.07 to 0.01). No difference in death was observed (relative risk 0.88, 0.68 to 1.14, risk difference −0.02, −0.04 to 0.01, respectively). Pooled analysis showed a significant benefit for the combined outcome of death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia, or both, at 36 weeks corrected gestation for babies treated with nasal CPAP (relative risk 0.91, 0.84 to 0.99, risk difference −0.04, -0.07 to 0.00), number needed to treat of 25). Conclusion One additional infant could survive to 36 weeks without bronchopulmonary dysplasia for every 25 babies treated with nasal CPAP in the delivery room rather than being intubated. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2013-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3805496/ /pubmed/24136633 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f5980 Text en © Schmölzer et al 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Schmölzer, Georg M
Kumar, Manoj
Pichler, Gerhard
Aziz, Khalid
O’Reilly, Megan
Cheung, Po-Yin
Non-invasive versus invasive respiratory support in preterm infants at birth: systematic review and meta-analysis
title Non-invasive versus invasive respiratory support in preterm infants at birth: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Non-invasive versus invasive respiratory support in preterm infants at birth: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Non-invasive versus invasive respiratory support in preterm infants at birth: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Non-invasive versus invasive respiratory support in preterm infants at birth: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Non-invasive versus invasive respiratory support in preterm infants at birth: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort non-invasive versus invasive respiratory support in preterm infants at birth: systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3805496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24136633
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f5980
work_keys_str_mv AT schmolzergeorgm noninvasiveversusinvasiverespiratorysupportinpreterminfantsatbirthsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kumarmanoj noninvasiveversusinvasiverespiratorysupportinpreterminfantsatbirthsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT pichlergerhard noninvasiveversusinvasiverespiratorysupportinpreterminfantsatbirthsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT azizkhalid noninvasiveversusinvasiverespiratorysupportinpreterminfantsatbirthsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT oreillymegan noninvasiveversusinvasiverespiratorysupportinpreterminfantsatbirthsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT cheungpoyin noninvasiveversusinvasiverespiratorysupportinpreterminfantsatbirthsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis