Cargando…
Descendant root volume varies as a function of root type: estimation of root biomass lost during uprooting in Pinus pinaster
Root systems of woody plants generally display a strong relationship between the cross-sectional area or cross-sectional diameter (CSD) of a root and the dry weight of biomass (DW(d)) or root volume (V(d)) that has grown (i.e., is descendent) from a point. Specification of this relationship allows o...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3805946/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24167506 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00402 |
_version_ | 1782477916553084928 |
---|---|
author | Danjon, Frédéric Caplan, Joshua S. Fortin, Mathieu Meredieu, Céline |
author_facet | Danjon, Frédéric Caplan, Joshua S. Fortin, Mathieu Meredieu, Céline |
author_sort | Danjon, Frédéric |
collection | PubMed |
description | Root systems of woody plants generally display a strong relationship between the cross-sectional area or cross-sectional diameter (CSD) of a root and the dry weight of biomass (DW(d)) or root volume (V(d)) that has grown (i.e., is descendent) from a point. Specification of this relationship allows one to quantify root architectural patterns and estimate the amount of material lost when root systems are extracted from the soil. However, specifications of this relationship generally do not account for the fact that root systems are comprised of multiple types of roots. We assessed whether the relationship between CSD and V(d) varies as a function of root type. Additionally, we sought to identify a more accurate and time-efficient method for estimating missing root volume than is currently available. We used a database that described the 3D root architecture of Pinus pinaster root systems (5, 12, or 19 years) from a stand in southwest France. We determined the relationship between CSD and V(d) for 10,000 root segments from intact root branches. Models were specified that did and did not account for root type. The relationships were then applied to the diameters of 11,000 broken root ends to estimate the volume of missing roots. CSD was nearly linearly related to the square root of V(d), but the slope of the curve varied greatly as a function of root type. Sinkers and deep roots tapered rapidly, as they were limited by available soil depth. Distal shallow roots tapered gradually, as they were less limited spatially. We estimated that younger trees lost an average of 17% of root volume when excavated, while older trees lost 4%. Missing volumes were smallest in the central parts of root systems and largest in distal shallow roots. The slopes of the curves for each root type are synthetic parameters that account for differentiation due to genetics, soil properties, or mechanical stimuli. Accounting for this differentiation is critical to estimating root loss accurately. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3805946 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38059462013-10-28 Descendant root volume varies as a function of root type: estimation of root biomass lost during uprooting in Pinus pinaster Danjon, Frédéric Caplan, Joshua S. Fortin, Mathieu Meredieu, Céline Front Plant Sci Plant Science Root systems of woody plants generally display a strong relationship between the cross-sectional area or cross-sectional diameter (CSD) of a root and the dry weight of biomass (DW(d)) or root volume (V(d)) that has grown (i.e., is descendent) from a point. Specification of this relationship allows one to quantify root architectural patterns and estimate the amount of material lost when root systems are extracted from the soil. However, specifications of this relationship generally do not account for the fact that root systems are comprised of multiple types of roots. We assessed whether the relationship between CSD and V(d) varies as a function of root type. Additionally, we sought to identify a more accurate and time-efficient method for estimating missing root volume than is currently available. We used a database that described the 3D root architecture of Pinus pinaster root systems (5, 12, or 19 years) from a stand in southwest France. We determined the relationship between CSD and V(d) for 10,000 root segments from intact root branches. Models were specified that did and did not account for root type. The relationships were then applied to the diameters of 11,000 broken root ends to estimate the volume of missing roots. CSD was nearly linearly related to the square root of V(d), but the slope of the curve varied greatly as a function of root type. Sinkers and deep roots tapered rapidly, as they were limited by available soil depth. Distal shallow roots tapered gradually, as they were less limited spatially. We estimated that younger trees lost an average of 17% of root volume when excavated, while older trees lost 4%. Missing volumes were smallest in the central parts of root systems and largest in distal shallow roots. The slopes of the curves for each root type are synthetic parameters that account for differentiation due to genetics, soil properties, or mechanical stimuli. Accounting for this differentiation is critical to estimating root loss accurately. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3805946/ /pubmed/24167506 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00402 Text en Copyright © Danjon, Caplan, Fortin and Meredieu http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Plant Science Danjon, Frédéric Caplan, Joshua S. Fortin, Mathieu Meredieu, Céline Descendant root volume varies as a function of root type: estimation of root biomass lost during uprooting in Pinus pinaster |
title | Descendant root volume varies as a function of root type: estimation of root biomass lost during uprooting in Pinus pinaster |
title_full | Descendant root volume varies as a function of root type: estimation of root biomass lost during uprooting in Pinus pinaster |
title_fullStr | Descendant root volume varies as a function of root type: estimation of root biomass lost during uprooting in Pinus pinaster |
title_full_unstemmed | Descendant root volume varies as a function of root type: estimation of root biomass lost during uprooting in Pinus pinaster |
title_short | Descendant root volume varies as a function of root type: estimation of root biomass lost during uprooting in Pinus pinaster |
title_sort | descendant root volume varies as a function of root type: estimation of root biomass lost during uprooting in pinus pinaster |
topic | Plant Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3805946/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24167506 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00402 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT danjonfrederic descendantrootvolumevariesasafunctionofroottypeestimationofrootbiomasslostduringuprootinginpinuspinaster AT caplanjoshuas descendantrootvolumevariesasafunctionofroottypeestimationofrootbiomasslostduringuprootinginpinuspinaster AT fortinmathieu descendantrootvolumevariesasafunctionofroottypeestimationofrootbiomasslostduringuprootinginpinuspinaster AT meredieuceline descendantrootvolumevariesasafunctionofroottypeestimationofrootbiomasslostduringuprootinginpinuspinaster |