Cargando…
Current Practice of Heart Donor Evaluation in Germany: Multivariable Risk Factor Analysis Confirms Practicability of Guidelines
Background. Organ shortage has liberalised the acceptance criteria of grafts for heart transplantation, but which donor characteristics ultimately influence the decision to perform transplantation? For the first time this was evaluated using real-time donor data from the German organ procurement org...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3806127/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24198963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/701854 |
_version_ | 1782288338695225344 |
---|---|
author | Zeissig, Sylke Ruth Fischer-Froehlich, Carl-Ludwig Polster, Frank Fruehauf, Nils R. Kirste, Guenter Schmidtmann, Irene |
author_facet | Zeissig, Sylke Ruth Fischer-Froehlich, Carl-Ludwig Polster, Frank Fruehauf, Nils R. Kirste, Guenter Schmidtmann, Irene |
author_sort | Zeissig, Sylke Ruth |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background. Organ shortage has liberalised the acceptance criteria of grafts for heart transplantation, but which donor characteristics ultimately influence the decision to perform transplantation? For the first time this was evaluated using real-time donor data from the German organ procurement organization (DSO). Observed associations are discussed with regard to international recommendations and guidelines. Methods. 5291 German donors (2006–2010) were formally eligible for heart donation. In logistic regression models 160 donor parameters were evaluated to assess their influence on using grafts for transplantation (random split of cases: 2/3 study sample, 1/3 validation sample). Results. Successful procurement was determined by low donor age (OR 0.87 per year; 95% CI [0.85–0.89], P < 0.0001), large donor height (OR 1.04 per cm; 95% CI [1.02–1.06], P < 0.0001), exclusion of impaired left ventricular function or wall motion (OR 0.01; 95% CI [0.002–0.036], P < 0.0001), arrhythmia (OR 0.05; 95% CI [0.009–0.260], P = 0.0004), and of severe coronary artery disease (OR 0.003; 95% CI [<0.001–0.01], P < 0.0001). Donor characteristics differed between cases where the procedure was aborted without and with allocation initiated via Eurotransplant. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3806127 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38061272013-11-06 Current Practice of Heart Donor Evaluation in Germany: Multivariable Risk Factor Analysis Confirms Practicability of Guidelines Zeissig, Sylke Ruth Fischer-Froehlich, Carl-Ludwig Polster, Frank Fruehauf, Nils R. Kirste, Guenter Schmidtmann, Irene J Transplant Research Article Background. Organ shortage has liberalised the acceptance criteria of grafts for heart transplantation, but which donor characteristics ultimately influence the decision to perform transplantation? For the first time this was evaluated using real-time donor data from the German organ procurement organization (DSO). Observed associations are discussed with regard to international recommendations and guidelines. Methods. 5291 German donors (2006–2010) were formally eligible for heart donation. In logistic regression models 160 donor parameters were evaluated to assess their influence on using grafts for transplantation (random split of cases: 2/3 study sample, 1/3 validation sample). Results. Successful procurement was determined by low donor age (OR 0.87 per year; 95% CI [0.85–0.89], P < 0.0001), large donor height (OR 1.04 per cm; 95% CI [1.02–1.06], P < 0.0001), exclusion of impaired left ventricular function or wall motion (OR 0.01; 95% CI [0.002–0.036], P < 0.0001), arrhythmia (OR 0.05; 95% CI [0.009–0.260], P = 0.0004), and of severe coronary artery disease (OR 0.003; 95% CI [<0.001–0.01], P < 0.0001). Donor characteristics differed between cases where the procedure was aborted without and with allocation initiated via Eurotransplant. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3806127/ /pubmed/24198963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/701854 Text en Copyright © 2013 Sylke Ruth Zeissig et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Zeissig, Sylke Ruth Fischer-Froehlich, Carl-Ludwig Polster, Frank Fruehauf, Nils R. Kirste, Guenter Schmidtmann, Irene Current Practice of Heart Donor Evaluation in Germany: Multivariable Risk Factor Analysis Confirms Practicability of Guidelines |
title | Current Practice of Heart Donor Evaluation in Germany: Multivariable Risk Factor Analysis Confirms Practicability of Guidelines |
title_full | Current Practice of Heart Donor Evaluation in Germany: Multivariable Risk Factor Analysis Confirms Practicability of Guidelines |
title_fullStr | Current Practice of Heart Donor Evaluation in Germany: Multivariable Risk Factor Analysis Confirms Practicability of Guidelines |
title_full_unstemmed | Current Practice of Heart Donor Evaluation in Germany: Multivariable Risk Factor Analysis Confirms Practicability of Guidelines |
title_short | Current Practice of Heart Donor Evaluation in Germany: Multivariable Risk Factor Analysis Confirms Practicability of Guidelines |
title_sort | current practice of heart donor evaluation in germany: multivariable risk factor analysis confirms practicability of guidelines |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3806127/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24198963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/701854 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zeissigsylkeruth currentpracticeofheartdonorevaluationingermanymultivariableriskfactoranalysisconfirmspracticabilityofguidelines AT fischerfroehlichcarlludwig currentpracticeofheartdonorevaluationingermanymultivariableriskfactoranalysisconfirmspracticabilityofguidelines AT polsterfrank currentpracticeofheartdonorevaluationingermanymultivariableriskfactoranalysisconfirmspracticabilityofguidelines AT fruehaufnilsr currentpracticeofheartdonorevaluationingermanymultivariableriskfactoranalysisconfirmspracticabilityofguidelines AT kirsteguenter currentpracticeofheartdonorevaluationingermanymultivariableriskfactoranalysisconfirmspracticabilityofguidelines AT schmidtmannirene currentpracticeofheartdonorevaluationingermanymultivariableriskfactoranalysisconfirmspracticabilityofguidelines |