Cargando…
Bariatric surgery versus non-surgical treatment for obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Objective To quantify the overall effects of bariatric surgery compared with non-surgical treatment for obesity. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis based on a random effects model. Data sources Searches of Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from their inception to December 2012 regard...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3806364/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24149519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f5934 |
_version_ | 1782288368721199104 |
---|---|
author | Gloy, Viktoria L Briel, Matthias Bhatt, Deepak L Kashyap, Sangeeta R Schauer, Philip R Mingrone, Geltrude Bucher, Heiner C Nordmann, Alain J |
author_facet | Gloy, Viktoria L Briel, Matthias Bhatt, Deepak L Kashyap, Sangeeta R Schauer, Philip R Mingrone, Geltrude Bucher, Heiner C Nordmann, Alain J |
author_sort | Gloy, Viktoria L |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective To quantify the overall effects of bariatric surgery compared with non-surgical treatment for obesity. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis based on a random effects model. Data sources Searches of Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from their inception to December 2012 regardless of language or publication status. Eligibility criteria Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials with ≥6 months of follow-up that included individuals with a body mass index ≥30, compared current bariatric surgery techniques with non-surgical treatment, and reported on body weight, cardiovascular risk factors, quality of life, or adverse events. Results The meta-analysis included 11 studies with 796 individuals (range of mean body mass index at baseline 30-52). Individuals allocated to bariatric surgery lost more body weight (mean difference −26 kg (95% confidence interval −31 to −21)) compared with non-surgical treatment, had a higher remission rate of type 2 diabetes (relative risk 22.1 (3.2 to 154.3) in a complete case analysis; 5.3 (1.8 to 15.8) in a conservative analysis assuming diabetes remission in all non-surgically treated individuals with missing data) and metabolic syndrome (relative risk 2.4 (1.6 to 3.6) in complete case analysis; 1.5 (0.9 to 2.3) in conservative analysis), greater improvements in quality of life and reductions in medicine use (no pooled data). Plasma triglyceride concentrations decreased more (mean difference −0.7 mmol/L (−1.0 to −0.4) and high density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations increased more (mean difference 0.21 mmol/L (0.1 to 0.3)). Changes in blood pressure and total or low density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations were not significantly different. There were no cardiovascular events or deaths reported after bariatric surgery. The most common adverse events after bariatric surgery were iron deficiency anaemia (15% of individuals undergoing malabsorptive bariatric surgery) and reoperations (8%). Conclusions Compared with non-surgical treatment of obesity, bariatric surgery leads to greater body weight loss and higher remission rates of type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome. However, results are limited to two years of follow-up and based on a small number of studies and individuals. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42012003317 (www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3806364 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38063642013-10-24 Bariatric surgery versus non-surgical treatment for obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials Gloy, Viktoria L Briel, Matthias Bhatt, Deepak L Kashyap, Sangeeta R Schauer, Philip R Mingrone, Geltrude Bucher, Heiner C Nordmann, Alain J BMJ Research Objective To quantify the overall effects of bariatric surgery compared with non-surgical treatment for obesity. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis based on a random effects model. Data sources Searches of Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from their inception to December 2012 regardless of language or publication status. Eligibility criteria Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials with ≥6 months of follow-up that included individuals with a body mass index ≥30, compared current bariatric surgery techniques with non-surgical treatment, and reported on body weight, cardiovascular risk factors, quality of life, or adverse events. Results The meta-analysis included 11 studies with 796 individuals (range of mean body mass index at baseline 30-52). Individuals allocated to bariatric surgery lost more body weight (mean difference −26 kg (95% confidence interval −31 to −21)) compared with non-surgical treatment, had a higher remission rate of type 2 diabetes (relative risk 22.1 (3.2 to 154.3) in a complete case analysis; 5.3 (1.8 to 15.8) in a conservative analysis assuming diabetes remission in all non-surgically treated individuals with missing data) and metabolic syndrome (relative risk 2.4 (1.6 to 3.6) in complete case analysis; 1.5 (0.9 to 2.3) in conservative analysis), greater improvements in quality of life and reductions in medicine use (no pooled data). Plasma triglyceride concentrations decreased more (mean difference −0.7 mmol/L (−1.0 to −0.4) and high density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations increased more (mean difference 0.21 mmol/L (0.1 to 0.3)). Changes in blood pressure and total or low density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations were not significantly different. There were no cardiovascular events or deaths reported after bariatric surgery. The most common adverse events after bariatric surgery were iron deficiency anaemia (15% of individuals undergoing malabsorptive bariatric surgery) and reoperations (8%). Conclusions Compared with non-surgical treatment of obesity, bariatric surgery leads to greater body weight loss and higher remission rates of type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome. However, results are limited to two years of follow-up and based on a small number of studies and individuals. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42012003317 (www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO). BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2013-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3806364/ /pubmed/24149519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f5934 Text en © Gloy et al 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Gloy, Viktoria L Briel, Matthias Bhatt, Deepak L Kashyap, Sangeeta R Schauer, Philip R Mingrone, Geltrude Bucher, Heiner C Nordmann, Alain J Bariatric surgery versus non-surgical treatment for obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials |
title | Bariatric surgery versus non-surgical treatment for obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials |
title_full | Bariatric surgery versus non-surgical treatment for obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials |
title_fullStr | Bariatric surgery versus non-surgical treatment for obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Bariatric surgery versus non-surgical treatment for obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials |
title_short | Bariatric surgery versus non-surgical treatment for obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials |
title_sort | bariatric surgery versus non-surgical treatment for obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3806364/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24149519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f5934 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gloyviktorial bariatricsurgeryversusnonsurgicaltreatmentforobesityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT brielmatthias bariatricsurgeryversusnonsurgicaltreatmentforobesityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT bhattdeepakl bariatricsurgeryversusnonsurgicaltreatmentforobesityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT kashyapsangeetar bariatricsurgeryversusnonsurgicaltreatmentforobesityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT schauerphilipr bariatricsurgeryversusnonsurgicaltreatmentforobesityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT mingronegeltrude bariatricsurgeryversusnonsurgicaltreatmentforobesityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT bucherheinerc bariatricsurgeryversusnonsurgicaltreatmentforobesityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT nordmannalainj bariatricsurgeryversusnonsurgicaltreatmentforobesityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials |