Cargando…

Fetal Eye Movements on Magnetic Resonance Imaging

OBJECTIVES: Eye movements are the physical expression of upper fetal brainstem function. Our aim was to identify and differentiate specific types of fetal eye movement patterns using dynamic MRI sequences. Their occurrence as well as the presence of conjugated eyeball motion and consistently paralle...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Woitek, Ramona, Kasprian, Gregor, Lindner, Christian, Stuhr, Fritz, Weber, Michael, Schöpf, Veronika, Brugger, Peter C., Asenbaum, Ulrika, Furtner, Julia, Bettelheim, Dieter, Seidl, Rainer, Prayer, Daniela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3806733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24194885
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077439
_version_ 1782288420406558720
author Woitek, Ramona
Kasprian, Gregor
Lindner, Christian
Stuhr, Fritz
Weber, Michael
Schöpf, Veronika
Brugger, Peter C.
Asenbaum, Ulrika
Furtner, Julia
Bettelheim, Dieter
Seidl, Rainer
Prayer, Daniela
author_facet Woitek, Ramona
Kasprian, Gregor
Lindner, Christian
Stuhr, Fritz
Weber, Michael
Schöpf, Veronika
Brugger, Peter C.
Asenbaum, Ulrika
Furtner, Julia
Bettelheim, Dieter
Seidl, Rainer
Prayer, Daniela
author_sort Woitek, Ramona
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Eye movements are the physical expression of upper fetal brainstem function. Our aim was to identify and differentiate specific types of fetal eye movement patterns using dynamic MRI sequences. Their occurrence as well as the presence of conjugated eyeball motion and consistently parallel eyeball position was systematically analyzed. METHODS: Dynamic SSFP sequences were acquired in 72 singleton fetuses (17–40 GW, three age groups [17–23 GW, 24–32 GW, 33–40 GW]). Fetal eye movements were evaluated according to a modified classification originally published by Birnholz (1981): Type 0: no eye movements; Type I: single transient deviations; Type Ia: fast deviation, slower reposition; Type Ib: fast deviation, fast reposition; Type II: single prolonged eye movements; Type III: complex sequences; and Type IV: nystagmoid. RESULTS: In 95.8% of fetuses, the evaluation of eye movements was possible using MRI, with a mean acquisition time of 70 seconds. Due to head motion, 4.2% of the fetuses and 20.1% of all dynamic SSFP sequences were excluded. Eye movements were observed in 45 fetuses (65.2%). Significant differences between the age groups were found for Type I (p = 0.03), Type Ia (p = 0.031), and Type IV eye movements (p = 0.033). Consistently parallel bulbs were found in 27.3–45%. CONCLUSIONS: In human fetuses, different eye movement patterns can be identified and described by MRI in utero. In addition to the originally classified eye movement patterns, a novel subtype has been observed, which apparently characterizes an important step in fetal brainstem development. We evaluated, for the first time, eyeball position in fetuses. Ultimately, the assessment of fetal eye movements by MRI yields the potential to identify early signs of brainstem dysfunction, as encountered in brain malformations such as Chiari II or molar tooth malformations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3806733
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38067332013-11-05 Fetal Eye Movements on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Woitek, Ramona Kasprian, Gregor Lindner, Christian Stuhr, Fritz Weber, Michael Schöpf, Veronika Brugger, Peter C. Asenbaum, Ulrika Furtner, Julia Bettelheim, Dieter Seidl, Rainer Prayer, Daniela PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: Eye movements are the physical expression of upper fetal brainstem function. Our aim was to identify and differentiate specific types of fetal eye movement patterns using dynamic MRI sequences. Their occurrence as well as the presence of conjugated eyeball motion and consistently parallel eyeball position was systematically analyzed. METHODS: Dynamic SSFP sequences were acquired in 72 singleton fetuses (17–40 GW, three age groups [17–23 GW, 24–32 GW, 33–40 GW]). Fetal eye movements were evaluated according to a modified classification originally published by Birnholz (1981): Type 0: no eye movements; Type I: single transient deviations; Type Ia: fast deviation, slower reposition; Type Ib: fast deviation, fast reposition; Type II: single prolonged eye movements; Type III: complex sequences; and Type IV: nystagmoid. RESULTS: In 95.8% of fetuses, the evaluation of eye movements was possible using MRI, with a mean acquisition time of 70 seconds. Due to head motion, 4.2% of the fetuses and 20.1% of all dynamic SSFP sequences were excluded. Eye movements were observed in 45 fetuses (65.2%). Significant differences between the age groups were found for Type I (p = 0.03), Type Ia (p = 0.031), and Type IV eye movements (p = 0.033). Consistently parallel bulbs were found in 27.3–45%. CONCLUSIONS: In human fetuses, different eye movement patterns can be identified and described by MRI in utero. In addition to the originally classified eye movement patterns, a novel subtype has been observed, which apparently characterizes an important step in fetal brainstem development. We evaluated, for the first time, eyeball position in fetuses. Ultimately, the assessment of fetal eye movements by MRI yields the potential to identify early signs of brainstem dysfunction, as encountered in brain malformations such as Chiari II or molar tooth malformations. Public Library of Science 2013-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3806733/ /pubmed/24194885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077439 Text en © 2013 Woitek et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Woitek, Ramona
Kasprian, Gregor
Lindner, Christian
Stuhr, Fritz
Weber, Michael
Schöpf, Veronika
Brugger, Peter C.
Asenbaum, Ulrika
Furtner, Julia
Bettelheim, Dieter
Seidl, Rainer
Prayer, Daniela
Fetal Eye Movements on Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title Fetal Eye Movements on Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_full Fetal Eye Movements on Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_fullStr Fetal Eye Movements on Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_full_unstemmed Fetal Eye Movements on Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_short Fetal Eye Movements on Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_sort fetal eye movements on magnetic resonance imaging
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3806733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24194885
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077439
work_keys_str_mv AT woitekramona fetaleyemovementsonmagneticresonanceimaging
AT kaspriangregor fetaleyemovementsonmagneticresonanceimaging
AT lindnerchristian fetaleyemovementsonmagneticresonanceimaging
AT stuhrfritz fetaleyemovementsonmagneticresonanceimaging
AT webermichael fetaleyemovementsonmagneticresonanceimaging
AT schopfveronika fetaleyemovementsonmagneticresonanceimaging
AT bruggerpeterc fetaleyemovementsonmagneticresonanceimaging
AT asenbaumulrika fetaleyemovementsonmagneticresonanceimaging
AT furtnerjulia fetaleyemovementsonmagneticresonanceimaging
AT bettelheimdieter fetaleyemovementsonmagneticresonanceimaging
AT seidlrainer fetaleyemovementsonmagneticresonanceimaging
AT prayerdaniela fetaleyemovementsonmagneticresonanceimaging