Cargando…

Cost-of-Illness in Psoriasis: Comparing Inpatient and Outpatient Therapy

Treatment modalities of chronic plaque psoriasis have dramatically changed over the past ten years with a still continuing shift from inpatient to outpatient treatment. This development is mainly caused by outpatient availability of highly efficient and relatively well-tolerated systemic treatments,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Steinke, Sabine I. B., Peitsch, Wiebke K., Ludwig, Alexander, Goebeler, Matthias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3806808/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24194911
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078152
_version_ 1782288437389295616
author Steinke, Sabine I. B.
Peitsch, Wiebke K.
Ludwig, Alexander
Goebeler, Matthias
author_facet Steinke, Sabine I. B.
Peitsch, Wiebke K.
Ludwig, Alexander
Goebeler, Matthias
author_sort Steinke, Sabine I. B.
collection PubMed
description Treatment modalities of chronic plaque psoriasis have dramatically changed over the past ten years with a still continuing shift from inpatient to outpatient treatment. This development is mainly caused by outpatient availability of highly efficient and relatively well-tolerated systemic treatments, in particular BioLogicals. In addition, inpatient treatment is time- and cost-intense, conflicting with the actual burst of health expenses and with patient preferences. Nevertheless, inpatient treatment with dithranol and UV light still is a major mainstay of psoriasis treatment in Germany. The current study aims at comparing the total costs of inpatient treatment and outpatient follow-up to mere outpatient therapy with different modalities (topical treatment, phototherapy, classic systemic therapy or BioLogicals) over a period of 12 months. To this end, a retrospective cost-of-illness study was conducted on 120 patients treated at the University Medical Centre Mannheim between 2005 and 2006. Inpatient therapy caused significantly higher direct medical, indirect and total annual costs than outpatient treatment (13,042 € versus 2,984 €). Its strong influence on cost levels was confirmed by regression analysis, with total costs rising by 104.3% in case of inpatient treatment. Patients receiving BioLogicals produced the overall highest costs, whereas outpatient treatment with classic systemic antipsoriatic medications was less cost-intense than other alternatives.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3806808
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38068082013-11-05 Cost-of-Illness in Psoriasis: Comparing Inpatient and Outpatient Therapy Steinke, Sabine I. B. Peitsch, Wiebke K. Ludwig, Alexander Goebeler, Matthias PLoS One Research Article Treatment modalities of chronic plaque psoriasis have dramatically changed over the past ten years with a still continuing shift from inpatient to outpatient treatment. This development is mainly caused by outpatient availability of highly efficient and relatively well-tolerated systemic treatments, in particular BioLogicals. In addition, inpatient treatment is time- and cost-intense, conflicting with the actual burst of health expenses and with patient preferences. Nevertheless, inpatient treatment with dithranol and UV light still is a major mainstay of psoriasis treatment in Germany. The current study aims at comparing the total costs of inpatient treatment and outpatient follow-up to mere outpatient therapy with different modalities (topical treatment, phototherapy, classic systemic therapy or BioLogicals) over a period of 12 months. To this end, a retrospective cost-of-illness study was conducted on 120 patients treated at the University Medical Centre Mannheim between 2005 and 2006. Inpatient therapy caused significantly higher direct medical, indirect and total annual costs than outpatient treatment (13,042 € versus 2,984 €). Its strong influence on cost levels was confirmed by regression analysis, with total costs rising by 104.3% in case of inpatient treatment. Patients receiving BioLogicals produced the overall highest costs, whereas outpatient treatment with classic systemic antipsoriatic medications was less cost-intense than other alternatives. Public Library of Science 2013-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3806808/ /pubmed/24194911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078152 Text en © 2013 Steinke et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Steinke, Sabine I. B.
Peitsch, Wiebke K.
Ludwig, Alexander
Goebeler, Matthias
Cost-of-Illness in Psoriasis: Comparing Inpatient and Outpatient Therapy
title Cost-of-Illness in Psoriasis: Comparing Inpatient and Outpatient Therapy
title_full Cost-of-Illness in Psoriasis: Comparing Inpatient and Outpatient Therapy
title_fullStr Cost-of-Illness in Psoriasis: Comparing Inpatient and Outpatient Therapy
title_full_unstemmed Cost-of-Illness in Psoriasis: Comparing Inpatient and Outpatient Therapy
title_short Cost-of-Illness in Psoriasis: Comparing Inpatient and Outpatient Therapy
title_sort cost-of-illness in psoriasis: comparing inpatient and outpatient therapy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3806808/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24194911
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078152
work_keys_str_mv AT steinkesabineib costofillnessinpsoriasiscomparinginpatientandoutpatienttherapy
AT peitschwiebkek costofillnessinpsoriasiscomparinginpatientandoutpatienttherapy
AT ludwigalexander costofillnessinpsoriasiscomparinginpatientandoutpatienttherapy
AT goebelermatthias costofillnessinpsoriasiscomparinginpatientandoutpatienttherapy