Cargando…

Pretreatment anti-Müllerian hormone predicts for loss of ovarian function after chemotherapy for early breast cancer()

AIM: Improving survival for women with early breast cancer (eBC) requires greater attention to the consequences of treatment, including risk to ovarian function. We have assessed whether biochemical markers of the ovarian reserve might improve prediction of chemotherapy related amenorrhoea. METHODS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anderson, Richard A., Rosendahl, Mikkel, Kelsey, Thomas W., Cameron, David A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Science Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3807650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23968732
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2013.07.014
_version_ 1782288497019715584
author Anderson, Richard A.
Rosendahl, Mikkel
Kelsey, Thomas W.
Cameron, David A.
author_facet Anderson, Richard A.
Rosendahl, Mikkel
Kelsey, Thomas W.
Cameron, David A.
author_sort Anderson, Richard A.
collection PubMed
description AIM: Improving survival for women with early breast cancer (eBC) requires greater attention to the consequences of treatment, including risk to ovarian function. We have assessed whether biochemical markers of the ovarian reserve might improve prediction of chemotherapy related amenorrhoea. METHODS: Women (n = 59, mean age 42.6 years [(range 23.3–52.5]) with eBC were recruited before any treatment. Pretreatment ovarian reserve markers (anti-Müllerian hormone [AMH], follicle-stimulating hormone [FSH], inhibin B) were analysed in relation to ovarian status at 2 years. RESULTS: Pretreatment AMH was significantly lower in women with amenorrhoea at 2 years (4.0 ± 0.9 pmol/L versus 17.2 ± 2.5, P < 0.0001), but FSH and inhibin B did not differ between groups. By logistic regression, pretreatment AMH, but not age, FSH or inhibin B, was an independent predictor of ovarian status at 2 years (P = 0.005; odds ratio 0.013). We combined these data with a similar cohort (combined n = 75); receiver–operator characteristic analysis for AMH gave area under curve (AUC) of 0.90 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82–0.97)). A cross-validated classification tree analysis resulted in a binary classification schema with sensitivity 98.2% and specificity 80.0% for correct classification of amenorrhoea. CONCLUSION: Pretreatment AMH is a useful predictor of long term post chemotherapy loss of ovarian function in women with eBC, adding significantly to the only previously established individualising predictor, i.e. age. AMH measurement may assist decision-making regarding treatment options and fertility preservation procedures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3807650
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Elsevier Science Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38076502013-11-01 Pretreatment anti-Müllerian hormone predicts for loss of ovarian function after chemotherapy for early breast cancer() Anderson, Richard A. Rosendahl, Mikkel Kelsey, Thomas W. Cameron, David A. Eur J Cancer Article AIM: Improving survival for women with early breast cancer (eBC) requires greater attention to the consequences of treatment, including risk to ovarian function. We have assessed whether biochemical markers of the ovarian reserve might improve prediction of chemotherapy related amenorrhoea. METHODS: Women (n = 59, mean age 42.6 years [(range 23.3–52.5]) with eBC were recruited before any treatment. Pretreatment ovarian reserve markers (anti-Müllerian hormone [AMH], follicle-stimulating hormone [FSH], inhibin B) were analysed in relation to ovarian status at 2 years. RESULTS: Pretreatment AMH was significantly lower in women with amenorrhoea at 2 years (4.0 ± 0.9 pmol/L versus 17.2 ± 2.5, P < 0.0001), but FSH and inhibin B did not differ between groups. By logistic regression, pretreatment AMH, but not age, FSH or inhibin B, was an independent predictor of ovarian status at 2 years (P = 0.005; odds ratio 0.013). We combined these data with a similar cohort (combined n = 75); receiver–operator characteristic analysis for AMH gave area under curve (AUC) of 0.90 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82–0.97)). A cross-validated classification tree analysis resulted in a binary classification schema with sensitivity 98.2% and specificity 80.0% for correct classification of amenorrhoea. CONCLUSION: Pretreatment AMH is a useful predictor of long term post chemotherapy loss of ovarian function in women with eBC, adding significantly to the only previously established individualising predictor, i.e. age. AMH measurement may assist decision-making regarding treatment options and fertility preservation procedures. Elsevier Science Ltd 2013-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3807650/ /pubmed/23968732 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2013.07.014 Text en © 2013 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Open Access under CC BY 3.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) license
spellingShingle Article
Anderson, Richard A.
Rosendahl, Mikkel
Kelsey, Thomas W.
Cameron, David A.
Pretreatment anti-Müllerian hormone predicts for loss of ovarian function after chemotherapy for early breast cancer()
title Pretreatment anti-Müllerian hormone predicts for loss of ovarian function after chemotherapy for early breast cancer()
title_full Pretreatment anti-Müllerian hormone predicts for loss of ovarian function after chemotherapy for early breast cancer()
title_fullStr Pretreatment anti-Müllerian hormone predicts for loss of ovarian function after chemotherapy for early breast cancer()
title_full_unstemmed Pretreatment anti-Müllerian hormone predicts for loss of ovarian function after chemotherapy for early breast cancer()
title_short Pretreatment anti-Müllerian hormone predicts for loss of ovarian function after chemotherapy for early breast cancer()
title_sort pretreatment anti-müllerian hormone predicts for loss of ovarian function after chemotherapy for early breast cancer()
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3807650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23968732
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2013.07.014
work_keys_str_mv AT andersonricharda pretreatmentantimullerianhormonepredictsforlossofovarianfunctionafterchemotherapyforearlybreastcancer
AT rosendahlmikkel pretreatmentantimullerianhormonepredictsforlossofovarianfunctionafterchemotherapyforearlybreastcancer
AT kelseythomasw pretreatmentantimullerianhormonepredictsforlossofovarianfunctionafterchemotherapyforearlybreastcancer
AT camerondavida pretreatmentantimullerianhormonepredictsforlossofovarianfunctionafterchemotherapyforearlybreastcancer