Cargando…
Pretreatment anti-Müllerian hormone predicts for loss of ovarian function after chemotherapy for early breast cancer()
AIM: Improving survival for women with early breast cancer (eBC) requires greater attention to the consequences of treatment, including risk to ovarian function. We have assessed whether biochemical markers of the ovarian reserve might improve prediction of chemotherapy related amenorrhoea. METHODS:...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Science Ltd
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3807650/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23968732 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2013.07.014 |
_version_ | 1782288497019715584 |
---|---|
author | Anderson, Richard A. Rosendahl, Mikkel Kelsey, Thomas W. Cameron, David A. |
author_facet | Anderson, Richard A. Rosendahl, Mikkel Kelsey, Thomas W. Cameron, David A. |
author_sort | Anderson, Richard A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: Improving survival for women with early breast cancer (eBC) requires greater attention to the consequences of treatment, including risk to ovarian function. We have assessed whether biochemical markers of the ovarian reserve might improve prediction of chemotherapy related amenorrhoea. METHODS: Women (n = 59, mean age 42.6 years [(range 23.3–52.5]) with eBC were recruited before any treatment. Pretreatment ovarian reserve markers (anti-Müllerian hormone [AMH], follicle-stimulating hormone [FSH], inhibin B) were analysed in relation to ovarian status at 2 years. RESULTS: Pretreatment AMH was significantly lower in women with amenorrhoea at 2 years (4.0 ± 0.9 pmol/L versus 17.2 ± 2.5, P < 0.0001), but FSH and inhibin B did not differ between groups. By logistic regression, pretreatment AMH, but not age, FSH or inhibin B, was an independent predictor of ovarian status at 2 years (P = 0.005; odds ratio 0.013). We combined these data with a similar cohort (combined n = 75); receiver–operator characteristic analysis for AMH gave area under curve (AUC) of 0.90 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82–0.97)). A cross-validated classification tree analysis resulted in a binary classification schema with sensitivity 98.2% and specificity 80.0% for correct classification of amenorrhoea. CONCLUSION: Pretreatment AMH is a useful predictor of long term post chemotherapy loss of ovarian function in women with eBC, adding significantly to the only previously established individualising predictor, i.e. age. AMH measurement may assist decision-making regarding treatment options and fertility preservation procedures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3807650 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Elsevier Science Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38076502013-11-01 Pretreatment anti-Müllerian hormone predicts for loss of ovarian function after chemotherapy for early breast cancer() Anderson, Richard A. Rosendahl, Mikkel Kelsey, Thomas W. Cameron, David A. Eur J Cancer Article AIM: Improving survival for women with early breast cancer (eBC) requires greater attention to the consequences of treatment, including risk to ovarian function. We have assessed whether biochemical markers of the ovarian reserve might improve prediction of chemotherapy related amenorrhoea. METHODS: Women (n = 59, mean age 42.6 years [(range 23.3–52.5]) with eBC were recruited before any treatment. Pretreatment ovarian reserve markers (anti-Müllerian hormone [AMH], follicle-stimulating hormone [FSH], inhibin B) were analysed in relation to ovarian status at 2 years. RESULTS: Pretreatment AMH was significantly lower in women with amenorrhoea at 2 years (4.0 ± 0.9 pmol/L versus 17.2 ± 2.5, P < 0.0001), but FSH and inhibin B did not differ between groups. By logistic regression, pretreatment AMH, but not age, FSH or inhibin B, was an independent predictor of ovarian status at 2 years (P = 0.005; odds ratio 0.013). We combined these data with a similar cohort (combined n = 75); receiver–operator characteristic analysis for AMH gave area under curve (AUC) of 0.90 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82–0.97)). A cross-validated classification tree analysis resulted in a binary classification schema with sensitivity 98.2% and specificity 80.0% for correct classification of amenorrhoea. CONCLUSION: Pretreatment AMH is a useful predictor of long term post chemotherapy loss of ovarian function in women with eBC, adding significantly to the only previously established individualising predictor, i.e. age. AMH measurement may assist decision-making regarding treatment options and fertility preservation procedures. Elsevier Science Ltd 2013-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3807650/ /pubmed/23968732 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2013.07.014 Text en © 2013 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Open Access under CC BY 3.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) license |
spellingShingle | Article Anderson, Richard A. Rosendahl, Mikkel Kelsey, Thomas W. Cameron, David A. Pretreatment anti-Müllerian hormone predicts for loss of ovarian function after chemotherapy for early breast cancer() |
title | Pretreatment anti-Müllerian hormone predicts for loss of ovarian function after chemotherapy for early breast cancer() |
title_full | Pretreatment anti-Müllerian hormone predicts for loss of ovarian function after chemotherapy for early breast cancer() |
title_fullStr | Pretreatment anti-Müllerian hormone predicts for loss of ovarian function after chemotherapy for early breast cancer() |
title_full_unstemmed | Pretreatment anti-Müllerian hormone predicts for loss of ovarian function after chemotherapy for early breast cancer() |
title_short | Pretreatment anti-Müllerian hormone predicts for loss of ovarian function after chemotherapy for early breast cancer() |
title_sort | pretreatment anti-müllerian hormone predicts for loss of ovarian function after chemotherapy for early breast cancer() |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3807650/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23968732 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2013.07.014 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT andersonricharda pretreatmentantimullerianhormonepredictsforlossofovarianfunctionafterchemotherapyforearlybreastcancer AT rosendahlmikkel pretreatmentantimullerianhormonepredictsforlossofovarianfunctionafterchemotherapyforearlybreastcancer AT kelseythomasw pretreatmentantimullerianhormonepredictsforlossofovarianfunctionafterchemotherapyforearlybreastcancer AT camerondavida pretreatmentantimullerianhormonepredictsforlossofovarianfunctionafterchemotherapyforearlybreastcancer |