Cargando…

Large scale genotype–phenotype analyses indicate that novel prognostic tools are required for families with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy

Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy has been genetically linked to reduced numbers (≤8) of D4Z4 repeats at 4q35 combined with 4A(159/161/168) DUX4 polyadenylation signal haplotype. However, we have recently reported that 1.3% of healthy individuals carry this molecular signature and 19% of subjec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ricci, Giulia, Scionti, Isabella, Sera, Francesco, Govi, Monica, D’Amico, Roberto, Frambolli, Ilaria, Mele, Fabiano, Filosto, Massimiliano, Vercelli, Liliana, Ruggiero, Lucia, Berardinelli, Angela, Angelini, Corrado, Antonini, Giovanni, Bucci, Elisabetta, Cao, Michelangelo, Daolio, Jessica, Di Muzio, Antonio, Di Leo, Rita, Galluzzi, Giuliana, Iannaccone, Elisabetta, Maggi, Lorenzo, Maruotti, Valerio, Moggio, Maurizio, Mongini, Tiziana, Morandi, Lucia, Nikolic, Ana, Pastorello, Ebe, Ricci, Enzo, Rodolico, Carmelo, Santoro, Lucio, Servida, Maura, Siciliano, Gabriele, Tomelleri, Giuliano, Tupler, Rossella
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3808686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24030947
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/awt226
_version_ 1782288613434720256
author Ricci, Giulia
Scionti, Isabella
Sera, Francesco
Govi, Monica
D’Amico, Roberto
Frambolli, Ilaria
Mele, Fabiano
Filosto, Massimiliano
Vercelli, Liliana
Ruggiero, Lucia
Berardinelli, Angela
Angelini, Corrado
Antonini, Giovanni
Bucci, Elisabetta
Cao, Michelangelo
Daolio, Jessica
Di Muzio, Antonio
Di Leo, Rita
Galluzzi, Giuliana
Iannaccone, Elisabetta
Maggi, Lorenzo
Maruotti, Valerio
Moggio, Maurizio
Mongini, Tiziana
Morandi, Lucia
Nikolic, Ana
Pastorello, Ebe
Ricci, Enzo
Rodolico, Carmelo
Santoro, Lucio
Servida, Maura
Siciliano, Gabriele
Tomelleri, Giuliano
Tupler, Rossella
author_facet Ricci, Giulia
Scionti, Isabella
Sera, Francesco
Govi, Monica
D’Amico, Roberto
Frambolli, Ilaria
Mele, Fabiano
Filosto, Massimiliano
Vercelli, Liliana
Ruggiero, Lucia
Berardinelli, Angela
Angelini, Corrado
Antonini, Giovanni
Bucci, Elisabetta
Cao, Michelangelo
Daolio, Jessica
Di Muzio, Antonio
Di Leo, Rita
Galluzzi, Giuliana
Iannaccone, Elisabetta
Maggi, Lorenzo
Maruotti, Valerio
Moggio, Maurizio
Mongini, Tiziana
Morandi, Lucia
Nikolic, Ana
Pastorello, Ebe
Ricci, Enzo
Rodolico, Carmelo
Santoro, Lucio
Servida, Maura
Siciliano, Gabriele
Tomelleri, Giuliano
Tupler, Rossella
author_sort Ricci, Giulia
collection PubMed
description Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy has been genetically linked to reduced numbers (≤8) of D4Z4 repeats at 4q35 combined with 4A(159/161/168) DUX4 polyadenylation signal haplotype. However, we have recently reported that 1.3% of healthy individuals carry this molecular signature and 19% of subjects affected by facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy do not carry alleles with eight or fewer D4Z4 repeats. Therefore, prognosis for subjects carrying or at risk of carrying D4Z4 reduced alleles has become more complicated. To test for additional prognostic factors, we measured the degree of motor impairment in a large group of patients affected by facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy and their relatives who are carrying D4Z4 reduced alleles. The clinical expression of motor impairment was assessed in 530 subjects, 163 probands and 367 relatives, from 176 unrelated families according to a standardized clinical score. The associations between clinical severity and size of D4Z4 allele, degree of kinship, gender, age and 4q haplotype were evaluated. Overall, 32.2% of relatives did not display any muscle functional impairment. This phenotype was influenced by the degree of relation with proband, because 47.1% of second- through fifth-degree relatives were unaffected, whereas only 27.5% of first-degree family members did not show motor impairment. The estimated risk of developing motor impairment by age 50 for relatives carrying a D4Z4 reduced allele with 1–3 repeats or 4–8 repeats was 88.7% and 55%, respectively. Male relatives had a mean score significantly higher than females (5.4 versus 4.0, P = 0.003). No 4q haplotype was exclusively associated with the presence of disease. In 13% of families in which D4Z4 alleles with 4–8 repeats segregate, the diagnosis of facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy was reported only in one generation. In conclusion, this large-scale analysis provides further information that should be taken into account when counselling families in which a reduced allele with 4–8 D4Z4 repeats segregates. In addition, the reduced expression of disease observed in distant relatives suggests that a family’s genetic background plays a role in the occurrence of facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. These results indicate that the identification of new susceptibility factors for this disease will require an accurate classification of families.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3808686
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38086862013-10-26 Large scale genotype–phenotype analyses indicate that novel prognostic tools are required for families with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy Ricci, Giulia Scionti, Isabella Sera, Francesco Govi, Monica D’Amico, Roberto Frambolli, Ilaria Mele, Fabiano Filosto, Massimiliano Vercelli, Liliana Ruggiero, Lucia Berardinelli, Angela Angelini, Corrado Antonini, Giovanni Bucci, Elisabetta Cao, Michelangelo Daolio, Jessica Di Muzio, Antonio Di Leo, Rita Galluzzi, Giuliana Iannaccone, Elisabetta Maggi, Lorenzo Maruotti, Valerio Moggio, Maurizio Mongini, Tiziana Morandi, Lucia Nikolic, Ana Pastorello, Ebe Ricci, Enzo Rodolico, Carmelo Santoro, Lucio Servida, Maura Siciliano, Gabriele Tomelleri, Giuliano Tupler, Rossella Brain Original Articles Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy has been genetically linked to reduced numbers (≤8) of D4Z4 repeats at 4q35 combined with 4A(159/161/168) DUX4 polyadenylation signal haplotype. However, we have recently reported that 1.3% of healthy individuals carry this molecular signature and 19% of subjects affected by facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy do not carry alleles with eight or fewer D4Z4 repeats. Therefore, prognosis for subjects carrying or at risk of carrying D4Z4 reduced alleles has become more complicated. To test for additional prognostic factors, we measured the degree of motor impairment in a large group of patients affected by facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy and their relatives who are carrying D4Z4 reduced alleles. The clinical expression of motor impairment was assessed in 530 subjects, 163 probands and 367 relatives, from 176 unrelated families according to a standardized clinical score. The associations between clinical severity and size of D4Z4 allele, degree of kinship, gender, age and 4q haplotype were evaluated. Overall, 32.2% of relatives did not display any muscle functional impairment. This phenotype was influenced by the degree of relation with proband, because 47.1% of second- through fifth-degree relatives were unaffected, whereas only 27.5% of first-degree family members did not show motor impairment. The estimated risk of developing motor impairment by age 50 for relatives carrying a D4Z4 reduced allele with 1–3 repeats or 4–8 repeats was 88.7% and 55%, respectively. Male relatives had a mean score significantly higher than females (5.4 versus 4.0, P = 0.003). No 4q haplotype was exclusively associated with the presence of disease. In 13% of families in which D4Z4 alleles with 4–8 repeats segregate, the diagnosis of facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy was reported only in one generation. In conclusion, this large-scale analysis provides further information that should be taken into account when counselling families in which a reduced allele with 4–8 D4Z4 repeats segregates. In addition, the reduced expression of disease observed in distant relatives suggests that a family’s genetic background plays a role in the occurrence of facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. These results indicate that the identification of new susceptibility factors for this disease will require an accurate classification of families. Oxford University Press 2013-11 2013-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3808686/ /pubmed/24030947 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/awt226 Text en © The Author (2013). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Articles
Ricci, Giulia
Scionti, Isabella
Sera, Francesco
Govi, Monica
D’Amico, Roberto
Frambolli, Ilaria
Mele, Fabiano
Filosto, Massimiliano
Vercelli, Liliana
Ruggiero, Lucia
Berardinelli, Angela
Angelini, Corrado
Antonini, Giovanni
Bucci, Elisabetta
Cao, Michelangelo
Daolio, Jessica
Di Muzio, Antonio
Di Leo, Rita
Galluzzi, Giuliana
Iannaccone, Elisabetta
Maggi, Lorenzo
Maruotti, Valerio
Moggio, Maurizio
Mongini, Tiziana
Morandi, Lucia
Nikolic, Ana
Pastorello, Ebe
Ricci, Enzo
Rodolico, Carmelo
Santoro, Lucio
Servida, Maura
Siciliano, Gabriele
Tomelleri, Giuliano
Tupler, Rossella
Large scale genotype–phenotype analyses indicate that novel prognostic tools are required for families with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy
title Large scale genotype–phenotype analyses indicate that novel prognostic tools are required for families with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy
title_full Large scale genotype–phenotype analyses indicate that novel prognostic tools are required for families with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy
title_fullStr Large scale genotype–phenotype analyses indicate that novel prognostic tools are required for families with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy
title_full_unstemmed Large scale genotype–phenotype analyses indicate that novel prognostic tools are required for families with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy
title_short Large scale genotype–phenotype analyses indicate that novel prognostic tools are required for families with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy
title_sort large scale genotype–phenotype analyses indicate that novel prognostic tools are required for families with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3808686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24030947
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/awt226
work_keys_str_mv AT riccigiulia largescalegenotypephenotypeanalysesindicatethatnovelprognostictoolsarerequiredforfamilieswithfacioscapulohumeralmusculardystrophy
AT sciontiisabella largescalegenotypephenotypeanalysesindicatethatnovelprognostictoolsarerequiredforfamilieswithfacioscapulohumeralmusculardystrophy
AT serafrancesco largescalegenotypephenotypeanalysesindicatethatnovelprognostictoolsarerequiredforfamilieswithfacioscapulohumeralmusculardystrophy
AT govimonica largescalegenotypephenotypeanalysesindicatethatnovelprognostictoolsarerequiredforfamilieswithfacioscapulohumeralmusculardystrophy
AT damicoroberto largescalegenotypephenotypeanalysesindicatethatnovelprognostictoolsarerequiredforfamilieswithfacioscapulohumeralmusculardystrophy
AT frambolliilaria largescalegenotypephenotypeanalysesindicatethatnovelprognostictoolsarerequiredforfamilieswithfacioscapulohumeralmusculardystrophy
AT melefabiano largescalegenotypephenotypeanalysesindicatethatnovelprognostictoolsarerequiredforfamilieswithfacioscapulohumeralmusculardystrophy
AT filostomassimiliano largescalegenotypephenotypeanalysesindicatethatnovelprognostictoolsarerequiredforfamilieswithfacioscapulohumeralmusculardystrophy
AT vercellililiana largescalegenotypephenotypeanalysesindicatethatnovelprognostictoolsarerequiredforfamilieswithfacioscapulohumeralmusculardystrophy
AT ruggierolucia largescalegenotypephenotypeanalysesindicatethatnovelprognostictoolsarerequiredforfamilieswithfacioscapulohumeralmusculardystrophy
AT berardinelliangela largescalegenotypephenotypeanalysesindicatethatnovelprognostictoolsarerequiredforfamilieswithfacioscapulohumeralmusculardystrophy
AT angelinicorrado largescalegenotypephenotypeanalysesindicatethatnovelprognostictoolsarerequiredforfamilieswithfacioscapulohumeralmusculardystrophy
AT antoninigiovanni largescalegenotypephenotypeanalysesindicatethatnovelprognostictoolsarerequiredforfamilieswithfacioscapulohumeralmusculardystrophy
AT buccielisabetta largescalegenotypephenotypeanalysesindicatethatnovelprognostictoolsarerequiredforfamilieswithfacioscapulohumeralmusculardystrophy
AT caomichelangelo largescalegenotypephenotypeanalysesindicatethatnovelprognostictoolsarerequiredforfamilieswithfacioscapulohumeralmusculardystrophy
AT daoliojessica largescalegenotypephenotypeanalysesindicatethatnovelprognostictoolsarerequiredforfamilieswithfacioscapulohumeralmusculardystrophy
AT dimuzioantonio largescalegenotypephenotypeanalysesindicatethatnovelprognostictoolsarerequiredforfamilieswithfacioscapulohumeralmusculardystrophy
AT dileorita largescalegenotypephenotypeanalysesindicatethatnovelprognostictoolsarerequiredforfamilieswithfacioscapulohumeralmusculardystrophy
AT galluzzigiuliana largescalegenotypephenotypeanalysesindicatethatnovelprognostictoolsarerequiredforfamilieswithfacioscapulohumeralmusculardystrophy
AT iannacconeelisabetta largescalegenotypephenotypeanalysesindicatethatnovelprognostictoolsarerequiredforfamilieswithfacioscapulohumeralmusculardystrophy
AT maggilorenzo largescalegenotypephenotypeanalysesindicatethatnovelprognostictoolsarerequiredforfamilieswithfacioscapulohumeralmusculardystrophy
AT maruottivalerio largescalegenotypephenotypeanalysesindicatethatnovelprognostictoolsarerequiredforfamilieswithfacioscapulohumeralmusculardystrophy
AT moggiomaurizio largescalegenotypephenotypeanalysesindicatethatnovelprognostictoolsarerequiredforfamilieswithfacioscapulohumeralmusculardystrophy
AT monginitiziana largescalegenotypephenotypeanalysesindicatethatnovelprognostictoolsarerequiredforfamilieswithfacioscapulohumeralmusculardystrophy
AT morandilucia largescalegenotypephenotypeanalysesindicatethatnovelprognostictoolsarerequiredforfamilieswithfacioscapulohumeralmusculardystrophy
AT nikolicana largescalegenotypephenotypeanalysesindicatethatnovelprognostictoolsarerequiredforfamilieswithfacioscapulohumeralmusculardystrophy
AT pastorelloebe largescalegenotypephenotypeanalysesindicatethatnovelprognostictoolsarerequiredforfamilieswithfacioscapulohumeralmusculardystrophy
AT riccienzo largescalegenotypephenotypeanalysesindicatethatnovelprognostictoolsarerequiredforfamilieswithfacioscapulohumeralmusculardystrophy
AT rodolicocarmelo largescalegenotypephenotypeanalysesindicatethatnovelprognostictoolsarerequiredforfamilieswithfacioscapulohumeralmusculardystrophy
AT santorolucio largescalegenotypephenotypeanalysesindicatethatnovelprognostictoolsarerequiredforfamilieswithfacioscapulohumeralmusculardystrophy
AT servidamaura largescalegenotypephenotypeanalysesindicatethatnovelprognostictoolsarerequiredforfamilieswithfacioscapulohumeralmusculardystrophy
AT sicilianogabriele largescalegenotypephenotypeanalysesindicatethatnovelprognostictoolsarerequiredforfamilieswithfacioscapulohumeralmusculardystrophy
AT tomellerigiuliano largescalegenotypephenotypeanalysesindicatethatnovelprognostictoolsarerequiredforfamilieswithfacioscapulohumeralmusculardystrophy
AT tuplerrossella largescalegenotypephenotypeanalysesindicatethatnovelprognostictoolsarerequiredforfamilieswithfacioscapulohumeralmusculardystrophy