Cargando…

A prospective cohort study to refine and validate the Panic Screening Score for identifying panic attacks associated with unexplained chest pain in the emergency department

INTRODUCTION: Panic-like anxiety (panic attacks with or without panic disorder), a highly treatable condition, is the most prevalent condition associated with unexplained chest pain in the emergency department. Panic-like anxiety may be responsible for a significant portion of the negative consequen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Foldes-Busque, Guillaume, Denis, Isabelle, Poitras, Julien, Fleet, Richard P, Archambault, Patrick, Dionne, Clermont E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3808760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24163208
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003877
_version_ 1782288626574426112
author Foldes-Busque, Guillaume
Denis, Isabelle
Poitras, Julien
Fleet, Richard P
Archambault, Patrick
Dionne, Clermont E
author_facet Foldes-Busque, Guillaume
Denis, Isabelle
Poitras, Julien
Fleet, Richard P
Archambault, Patrick
Dionne, Clermont E
author_sort Foldes-Busque, Guillaume
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Panic-like anxiety (panic attacks with or without panic disorder), a highly treatable condition, is the most prevalent condition associated with unexplained chest pain in the emergency department. Panic-like anxiety may be responsible for a significant portion of the negative consequences of unexplained chest pain, such as functional limitations and chronicity. However, more than 92% of panic-like anxiety cases remain undiagnosed at the time of discharge from the emergency department. The 4-item Panic Screening Score (PSS) questionnaire was derived in order to increase the identification of panic-like anxiety in emergency department patients with unexplained chest pain. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The goals of this prospective cohort study were to (1) refine the PSS; (2) validate the revised version of the PSS; (3) measure the reliability of the revised version of the PSS and (4) assess the acceptability of the instrument among emergency physicians. Eligible and consenting patients will be administered the PSS in a large emergency department. Patients will be contacted by phone for administration of the criterion standard for panic attacks as well as by a standardised interview to collect information for other predictors of panic attacks. Multivariate analysis will be used to refine the PSS. The new version will be prospectively validated in an independent sample and inter-rater agreement will be assessed in 10% of cases. The screening instrument acceptability will be assessed with the Ottawa Acceptability of Decision Rules Instrument. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study protocol has been reviewed and approved by the Alphonse-Desjardins research ethics committee. The results of the study will be presented in scientific conferences and published in peer-reviewed scientific journals. Further dissemination via workshops and a dedicated website is planned.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3808760
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38087602013-10-29 A prospective cohort study to refine and validate the Panic Screening Score for identifying panic attacks associated with unexplained chest pain in the emergency department Foldes-Busque, Guillaume Denis, Isabelle Poitras, Julien Fleet, Richard P Archambault, Patrick Dionne, Clermont E BMJ Open Emergency Medicine INTRODUCTION: Panic-like anxiety (panic attacks with or without panic disorder), a highly treatable condition, is the most prevalent condition associated with unexplained chest pain in the emergency department. Panic-like anxiety may be responsible for a significant portion of the negative consequences of unexplained chest pain, such as functional limitations and chronicity. However, more than 92% of panic-like anxiety cases remain undiagnosed at the time of discharge from the emergency department. The 4-item Panic Screening Score (PSS) questionnaire was derived in order to increase the identification of panic-like anxiety in emergency department patients with unexplained chest pain. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The goals of this prospective cohort study were to (1) refine the PSS; (2) validate the revised version of the PSS; (3) measure the reliability of the revised version of the PSS and (4) assess the acceptability of the instrument among emergency physicians. Eligible and consenting patients will be administered the PSS in a large emergency department. Patients will be contacted by phone for administration of the criterion standard for panic attacks as well as by a standardised interview to collect information for other predictors of panic attacks. Multivariate analysis will be used to refine the PSS. The new version will be prospectively validated in an independent sample and inter-rater agreement will be assessed in 10% of cases. The screening instrument acceptability will be assessed with the Ottawa Acceptability of Decision Rules Instrument. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study protocol has been reviewed and approved by the Alphonse-Desjardins research ethics committee. The results of the study will be presented in scientific conferences and published in peer-reviewed scientific journals. Further dissemination via workshops and a dedicated website is planned. BMJ Publishing Group 2013-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3808760/ /pubmed/24163208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003877 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Emergency Medicine
Foldes-Busque, Guillaume
Denis, Isabelle
Poitras, Julien
Fleet, Richard P
Archambault, Patrick
Dionne, Clermont E
A prospective cohort study to refine and validate the Panic Screening Score for identifying panic attacks associated with unexplained chest pain in the emergency department
title A prospective cohort study to refine and validate the Panic Screening Score for identifying panic attacks associated with unexplained chest pain in the emergency department
title_full A prospective cohort study to refine and validate the Panic Screening Score for identifying panic attacks associated with unexplained chest pain in the emergency department
title_fullStr A prospective cohort study to refine and validate the Panic Screening Score for identifying panic attacks associated with unexplained chest pain in the emergency department
title_full_unstemmed A prospective cohort study to refine and validate the Panic Screening Score for identifying panic attacks associated with unexplained chest pain in the emergency department
title_short A prospective cohort study to refine and validate the Panic Screening Score for identifying panic attacks associated with unexplained chest pain in the emergency department
title_sort prospective cohort study to refine and validate the panic screening score for identifying panic attacks associated with unexplained chest pain in the emergency department
topic Emergency Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3808760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24163208
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003877
work_keys_str_mv AT foldesbusqueguillaume aprospectivecohortstudytorefineandvalidatethepanicscreeningscoreforidentifyingpanicattacksassociatedwithunexplainedchestpainintheemergencydepartment
AT denisisabelle aprospectivecohortstudytorefineandvalidatethepanicscreeningscoreforidentifyingpanicattacksassociatedwithunexplainedchestpainintheemergencydepartment
AT poitrasjulien aprospectivecohortstudytorefineandvalidatethepanicscreeningscoreforidentifyingpanicattacksassociatedwithunexplainedchestpainintheemergencydepartment
AT fleetrichardp aprospectivecohortstudytorefineandvalidatethepanicscreeningscoreforidentifyingpanicattacksassociatedwithunexplainedchestpainintheemergencydepartment
AT archambaultpatrick aprospectivecohortstudytorefineandvalidatethepanicscreeningscoreforidentifyingpanicattacksassociatedwithunexplainedchestpainintheemergencydepartment
AT dionneclermonte aprospectivecohortstudytorefineandvalidatethepanicscreeningscoreforidentifyingpanicattacksassociatedwithunexplainedchestpainintheemergencydepartment
AT foldesbusqueguillaume prospectivecohortstudytorefineandvalidatethepanicscreeningscoreforidentifyingpanicattacksassociatedwithunexplainedchestpainintheemergencydepartment
AT denisisabelle prospectivecohortstudytorefineandvalidatethepanicscreeningscoreforidentifyingpanicattacksassociatedwithunexplainedchestpainintheemergencydepartment
AT poitrasjulien prospectivecohortstudytorefineandvalidatethepanicscreeningscoreforidentifyingpanicattacksassociatedwithunexplainedchestpainintheemergencydepartment
AT fleetrichardp prospectivecohortstudytorefineandvalidatethepanicscreeningscoreforidentifyingpanicattacksassociatedwithunexplainedchestpainintheemergencydepartment
AT archambaultpatrick prospectivecohortstudytorefineandvalidatethepanicscreeningscoreforidentifyingpanicattacksassociatedwithunexplainedchestpainintheemergencydepartment
AT dionneclermonte prospectivecohortstudytorefineandvalidatethepanicscreeningscoreforidentifyingpanicattacksassociatedwithunexplainedchestpainintheemergencydepartment