Cargando…

Development of a risk assessment tool for contact tracing people after contact with infectious patients while travelling by bus or other public ground transport: a Delphi consensus approach

BACKGROUND: Tracing persons who have been in contact with an infectious patient may be very effective in preventing the spread of communicable diseases. However, criteria to decide when to conduct contact tracing are not well established. We have investigated the available evidence for contact traci...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mohr, Oliver, Hermes, Julia, Schink, Susanne B, Askar, Mona, Menucci, Daniel, Swaan, Corien, Goetsch, Udo, Monk, Philip, Eckmanns, Tim, Poggensee, Gabriele, Krause, Gérard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3808761/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24157815
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002939
_version_ 1782288626822938624
author Mohr, Oliver
Hermes, Julia
Schink, Susanne B
Askar, Mona
Menucci, Daniel
Swaan, Corien
Goetsch, Udo
Monk, Philip
Eckmanns, Tim
Poggensee, Gabriele
Krause, Gérard
author_facet Mohr, Oliver
Hermes, Julia
Schink, Susanne B
Askar, Mona
Menucci, Daniel
Swaan, Corien
Goetsch, Udo
Monk, Philip
Eckmanns, Tim
Poggensee, Gabriele
Krause, Gérard
author_sort Mohr, Oliver
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Tracing persons who have been in contact with an infectious patient may be very effective in preventing the spread of communicable diseases. However, criteria to decide when to conduct contact tracing are not well established. We have investigated the available evidence for contact tracing with a focus on public ground transport aiming to give guidance in what situations contact tracing should be considered. METHODS: Relevant infectious diseases suitable for contact tracing in ground transport and a set of disease-specific epidemiological criteria were defined through literature search and structured multistep expert consultations. We developed continuous scales for each criterion to be rated for its relevance to contact tracing in ground transport. We used the Delphi method with an international expert panel to position the values of criteria on the respective scales. RESULTS: The study led to the development of the ‘Contact Tracing-Risk Assessment Profile’ (CT-RAP), a decision-making instrument, taking into account pathogen-specific as well as situation-specific criteria. This report describes the methodology of this instrument and presents two examples of ready-to-use CT-RAP for tuberculosis and for meningococcal disease in public ground transport. DISCUSSION: The systematic and transparent use of the CT-RAP for tuberculosis and meningococcal disease is likely to facilitate reasonable, efficient and user-friendly decisions with respect to contact tracing. New CT-RAPs for additional pathogens and different settings such as schools and kindergartens are being planned.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3808761
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38087612013-10-29 Development of a risk assessment tool for contact tracing people after contact with infectious patients while travelling by bus or other public ground transport: a Delphi consensus approach Mohr, Oliver Hermes, Julia Schink, Susanne B Askar, Mona Menucci, Daniel Swaan, Corien Goetsch, Udo Monk, Philip Eckmanns, Tim Poggensee, Gabriele Krause, Gérard BMJ Open Public Health BACKGROUND: Tracing persons who have been in contact with an infectious patient may be very effective in preventing the spread of communicable diseases. However, criteria to decide when to conduct contact tracing are not well established. We have investigated the available evidence for contact tracing with a focus on public ground transport aiming to give guidance in what situations contact tracing should be considered. METHODS: Relevant infectious diseases suitable for contact tracing in ground transport and a set of disease-specific epidemiological criteria were defined through literature search and structured multistep expert consultations. We developed continuous scales for each criterion to be rated for its relevance to contact tracing in ground transport. We used the Delphi method with an international expert panel to position the values of criteria on the respective scales. RESULTS: The study led to the development of the ‘Contact Tracing-Risk Assessment Profile’ (CT-RAP), a decision-making instrument, taking into account pathogen-specific as well as situation-specific criteria. This report describes the methodology of this instrument and presents two examples of ready-to-use CT-RAP for tuberculosis and for meningococcal disease in public ground transport. DISCUSSION: The systematic and transparent use of the CT-RAP for tuberculosis and meningococcal disease is likely to facilitate reasonable, efficient and user-friendly decisions with respect to contact tracing. New CT-RAPs for additional pathogens and different settings such as schools and kindergartens are being planned. BMJ Publishing Group 2013-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3808761/ /pubmed/24157815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002939 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Public Health
Mohr, Oliver
Hermes, Julia
Schink, Susanne B
Askar, Mona
Menucci, Daniel
Swaan, Corien
Goetsch, Udo
Monk, Philip
Eckmanns, Tim
Poggensee, Gabriele
Krause, Gérard
Development of a risk assessment tool for contact tracing people after contact with infectious patients while travelling by bus or other public ground transport: a Delphi consensus approach
title Development of a risk assessment tool for contact tracing people after contact with infectious patients while travelling by bus or other public ground transport: a Delphi consensus approach
title_full Development of a risk assessment tool for contact tracing people after contact with infectious patients while travelling by bus or other public ground transport: a Delphi consensus approach
title_fullStr Development of a risk assessment tool for contact tracing people after contact with infectious patients while travelling by bus or other public ground transport: a Delphi consensus approach
title_full_unstemmed Development of a risk assessment tool for contact tracing people after contact with infectious patients while travelling by bus or other public ground transport: a Delphi consensus approach
title_short Development of a risk assessment tool for contact tracing people after contact with infectious patients while travelling by bus or other public ground transport: a Delphi consensus approach
title_sort development of a risk assessment tool for contact tracing people after contact with infectious patients while travelling by bus or other public ground transport: a delphi consensus approach
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3808761/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24157815
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002939
work_keys_str_mv AT mohroliver developmentofariskassessmenttoolforcontacttracingpeopleaftercontactwithinfectiouspatientswhiletravellingbybusorotherpublicgroundtransportadelphiconsensusapproach
AT hermesjulia developmentofariskassessmenttoolforcontacttracingpeopleaftercontactwithinfectiouspatientswhiletravellingbybusorotherpublicgroundtransportadelphiconsensusapproach
AT schinksusanneb developmentofariskassessmenttoolforcontacttracingpeopleaftercontactwithinfectiouspatientswhiletravellingbybusorotherpublicgroundtransportadelphiconsensusapproach
AT askarmona developmentofariskassessmenttoolforcontacttracingpeopleaftercontactwithinfectiouspatientswhiletravellingbybusorotherpublicgroundtransportadelphiconsensusapproach
AT menuccidaniel developmentofariskassessmenttoolforcontacttracingpeopleaftercontactwithinfectiouspatientswhiletravellingbybusorotherpublicgroundtransportadelphiconsensusapproach
AT swaancorien developmentofariskassessmenttoolforcontacttracingpeopleaftercontactwithinfectiouspatientswhiletravellingbybusorotherpublicgroundtransportadelphiconsensusapproach
AT goetschudo developmentofariskassessmenttoolforcontacttracingpeopleaftercontactwithinfectiouspatientswhiletravellingbybusorotherpublicgroundtransportadelphiconsensusapproach
AT monkphilip developmentofariskassessmenttoolforcontacttracingpeopleaftercontactwithinfectiouspatientswhiletravellingbybusorotherpublicgroundtransportadelphiconsensusapproach
AT eckmannstim developmentofariskassessmenttoolforcontacttracingpeopleaftercontactwithinfectiouspatientswhiletravellingbybusorotherpublicgroundtransportadelphiconsensusapproach
AT poggenseegabriele developmentofariskassessmenttoolforcontacttracingpeopleaftercontactwithinfectiouspatientswhiletravellingbybusorotherpublicgroundtransportadelphiconsensusapproach
AT krausegerard developmentofariskassessmenttoolforcontacttracingpeopleaftercontactwithinfectiouspatientswhiletravellingbybusorotherpublicgroundtransportadelphiconsensusapproach