Cargando…

Prospective Study Comparing Functional Outcomes and Revision Rates Between Hip Resurfacing and Total Hip Arthroplasty: Preliminary Results for 2 Years

There is a need of independent prospective studies about modern generation of hip resurfacing implants. The aim of this propective observational study was to compare the functional outcomes and revision rates with hip resurfacing arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty and to present the preliminary...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pailhé, Régis, Reina, Nicolas, Cavaignac, Etienne, Sharma, Akash, Lafontan, Valérie, Laffosse, Jean-Michel, Chiron, Philippe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3808795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24191180
http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/or.2013.e20
_version_ 1782288633154240512
author Pailhé, Régis
Reina, Nicolas
Cavaignac, Etienne
Sharma, Akash
Lafontan, Valérie
Laffosse, Jean-Michel
Chiron, Philippe
author_facet Pailhé, Régis
Reina, Nicolas
Cavaignac, Etienne
Sharma, Akash
Lafontan, Valérie
Laffosse, Jean-Michel
Chiron, Philippe
author_sort Pailhé, Régis
collection PubMed
description There is a need of independent prospective studies about modern generation of hip resurfacing implants. The aim of this propective observational study was to compare the functional outcomes and revision rates with hip resurfacing arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty and to present the preliminary results at 2 years. Patients included were recruited prospectively in the Partial Pelvic Replacement Hip Project by a single surgeon between January 2007 and January 2010. Patients were assessed with the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Postel-Merle d’Aubigné (MDA) score and Devane Score. The end point of the study was reoperation for any cause related to the prosthesis. At a mean follow up of 38.6 months there were a total of 142 patients with hip resurfacing (group 1) [100 Durom(®) (Zimmer Inc., Warsaw, IN, USA) and 42 Birmingham Hip Resurfacing(®) (Smith & Nephew, Memphis, TN, USA)] and 278 patients with total hip arthroplasty (group 2). The results showed significantly greater gain of HHS, MDA and Devane score with hip resurfacing procedures. However, considering all the complications, the rate was significantly higher in group 16.4% vs 1.79% in group 2 (P<0.0001). In group 1 we observed 6 complications only concerned males with Durom(®) implants. The follow up of this cohort is still on going and may deliver more information on the evolution of these results in time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3808795
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38087952013-11-04 Prospective Study Comparing Functional Outcomes and Revision Rates Between Hip Resurfacing and Total Hip Arthroplasty: Preliminary Results for 2 Years Pailhé, Régis Reina, Nicolas Cavaignac, Etienne Sharma, Akash Lafontan, Valérie Laffosse, Jean-Michel Chiron, Philippe Orthop Rev (Pavia) Article There is a need of independent prospective studies about modern generation of hip resurfacing implants. The aim of this propective observational study was to compare the functional outcomes and revision rates with hip resurfacing arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty and to present the preliminary results at 2 years. Patients included were recruited prospectively in the Partial Pelvic Replacement Hip Project by a single surgeon between January 2007 and January 2010. Patients were assessed with the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Postel-Merle d’Aubigné (MDA) score and Devane Score. The end point of the study was reoperation for any cause related to the prosthesis. At a mean follow up of 38.6 months there were a total of 142 patients with hip resurfacing (group 1) [100 Durom(®) (Zimmer Inc., Warsaw, IN, USA) and 42 Birmingham Hip Resurfacing(®) (Smith & Nephew, Memphis, TN, USA)] and 278 patients with total hip arthroplasty (group 2). The results showed significantly greater gain of HHS, MDA and Devane score with hip resurfacing procedures. However, considering all the complications, the rate was significantly higher in group 16.4% vs 1.79% in group 2 (P<0.0001). In group 1 we observed 6 complications only concerned males with Durom(®) implants. The follow up of this cohort is still on going and may deliver more information on the evolution of these results in time. PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy 2013-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3808795/ /pubmed/24191180 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/or.2013.e20 Text en ©Copyright R. Pailhé et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Pailhé, Régis
Reina, Nicolas
Cavaignac, Etienne
Sharma, Akash
Lafontan, Valérie
Laffosse, Jean-Michel
Chiron, Philippe
Prospective Study Comparing Functional Outcomes and Revision Rates Between Hip Resurfacing and Total Hip Arthroplasty: Preliminary Results for 2 Years
title Prospective Study Comparing Functional Outcomes and Revision Rates Between Hip Resurfacing and Total Hip Arthroplasty: Preliminary Results for 2 Years
title_full Prospective Study Comparing Functional Outcomes and Revision Rates Between Hip Resurfacing and Total Hip Arthroplasty: Preliminary Results for 2 Years
title_fullStr Prospective Study Comparing Functional Outcomes and Revision Rates Between Hip Resurfacing and Total Hip Arthroplasty: Preliminary Results for 2 Years
title_full_unstemmed Prospective Study Comparing Functional Outcomes and Revision Rates Between Hip Resurfacing and Total Hip Arthroplasty: Preliminary Results for 2 Years
title_short Prospective Study Comparing Functional Outcomes and Revision Rates Between Hip Resurfacing and Total Hip Arthroplasty: Preliminary Results for 2 Years
title_sort prospective study comparing functional outcomes and revision rates between hip resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty: preliminary results for 2 years
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3808795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24191180
http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/or.2013.e20
work_keys_str_mv AT pailheregis prospectivestudycomparingfunctionaloutcomesandrevisionratesbetweenhipresurfacingandtotalhiparthroplastypreliminaryresultsfor2years
AT reinanicolas prospectivestudycomparingfunctionaloutcomesandrevisionratesbetweenhipresurfacingandtotalhiparthroplastypreliminaryresultsfor2years
AT cavaignacetienne prospectivestudycomparingfunctionaloutcomesandrevisionratesbetweenhipresurfacingandtotalhiparthroplastypreliminaryresultsfor2years
AT sharmaakash prospectivestudycomparingfunctionaloutcomesandrevisionratesbetweenhipresurfacingandtotalhiparthroplastypreliminaryresultsfor2years
AT lafontanvalerie prospectivestudycomparingfunctionaloutcomesandrevisionratesbetweenhipresurfacingandtotalhiparthroplastypreliminaryresultsfor2years
AT laffossejeanmichel prospectivestudycomparingfunctionaloutcomesandrevisionratesbetweenhipresurfacingandtotalhiparthroplastypreliminaryresultsfor2years
AT chironphilippe prospectivestudycomparingfunctionaloutcomesandrevisionratesbetweenhipresurfacingandtotalhiparthroplastypreliminaryresultsfor2years